Dev retweeted
The future light cone of discoveries rounds up to 100% engineering, as the set of physics rules that govern our reality is very tiny compared to what can be done with those rules.
The reason I didn’t choose a career in physics, my favorite subject, is that I would be stuck waiting for a new collider or telescope. Better to advance technologies that ultimately enable discovery of new physics.
Dev retweeted
Not to be that guy but UAP's are extremely interested in nuclear weapons and have shown zero interest in data centers or AI
Dev retweeted
I wanna see something! Yall wanna see me come back and fight so bad don’t yall? @JaronEnnis would you fight me next if I come outta retirement?
Dev retweeted
🚨 This Round against Cotto would be one of the toughest rounds in Floyd’s career the Great Infamous Round the 8th Round‼️
Dev retweeted
youtu.be/AThFAxF7Mgw Here’s the full breakdown below. Make sure you’ve got a hand free to pick your jaw up from the floor.
LAYER 0: INTRODUCTION TO GEOMETRIC UNITY - 00:00:00
- Introduction to Geometric Unity
LAYER 1: FOUNDATIONS OF A THEORY OF EVERYTHING - 00:02:34
- Introduction to Geometric Unity
- What is a Theory of Everything?
- The Current State of Fundamental Physics
- The Core Equations of Modern Physics
- Term-by-Term Breakdown of Fundamental Physics
- The Analogy Between Einstein and Yang-Mills
LAYER 2: MATHEMATICAL CONSTRUCTIONS - 00:14:09
- The Observerse Construction
- The Frame Bundle and Its Double Cover
- Observation Maps
- Tangent Bundle Construction
- Vertical and Horizontal Bundles
- The Zorro Construction
- The Chimeric Bundle
- The Frobenius Inner Product
- Signature Selection (7,7)
- Defining Spinors Without a Metric
- The Structure Group and Representation Theory
- Principal Bundle Construction
- The Inhomogeneous Gauge Group
- Right Action on Connections
- The Augmented Torsion Tensor
- The Shiab Operator
- The First-Order Action
- Field Equations
- Fermions and Supersymmetry
- The Deformation Complex
- The Seesaw Mechanism
- Structure Group Reduction
- Three Generations from the Complex
- Higgs from Yang-Mills
- Trace and Traceless Contributions
- Natural Quartic Potential
- Yukawa as Minimal Coupling
- Higgs-Yang-Mills Correspondence
- The Missing Quadratic Term
- Emergence of Cosmological Constant and CKM Matrix
LAYER 3: EXPLAINING THE UNIVERSE IN GU - 01:20:46
- Welcome to Layer 3 and Brief Recap
- Einstein-Hilbert Action in GU
- Yang-Mills-Maxwell Term in GU
- Dirac Action in GU
- Higgs Sector: Derivation of the Higgs Kinetic and Potential Terms
- Yukawa Coupling: Derivation via Minimal Coupling
- Lorentz Group and the Standard Model Gauge Group
- Family Quantum Numbers: Q = ℂ₁₆ₕ
- Three Families of Matter: ψ = ⊕ᵃ³ψₐ
- CKM and PMNS Mixing Matrices
- Dirac Equation in Geometric Unity
- Klein-Gordon Equation in Geometric Unity
- Einstein Field Equation in Geometric Unity
- Yang-Mills Equation in Geometric Unity
- Notes on the Simplicity of Physics Equations
- Layer 3 Conclusion
LAYER 4: GU AT FOUR LEVELS OF UNDERSTANDING - 02:32:45
- Geometric Unity Explained To A Five Year Old
- Geometric Unity Explained To An Undergraduate
- Geometric Unity at the Graduate Level
- Geometric Unity at the PhD Level
- Open Questions in GU
CONCLUSION - 02:58:14
- Recap: 30 Steps of Geometric Unity
- Final Thoughts and Acknowledgments
Dev retweeted
We have no good words to describe the maths of quantum physics. Because we need to talk about it somehow, we have come up with phrases like "in two places at once" or "takes all paths at the same time," or "action at a distance."
These are all over the popular science literature because it's the best we can do without maths. And I think that they fulfil a purpose in making an abstract topic a little more comprehensible. But they shouldn't be mistaken for a description of reality.
I think that this is to be expected, that as we discover theories about nature which are further removed from our everyday experience, that words literally fail us and maths is what remains.
This is why I don't understand^ when people say that we don't understand what a particle is or what gravity is because we "only" have a mathematical description. What do they expect? I think having a mathematical description is what it means to understand something.
xitter.cf/LoneDruid_1/status/191…
