Wrong!! The ‘Gran Sasso’ experiment was a botched hit job and totally dishonest. They tested the Diosi version of quantum gravity OR collapse versus the Penrose version, both predicting OR at time t =h/E_G. But Diosi predicted energy would be generated and Penrose said no energy would be detected. They (including Diosi) did the experiment under Gran Sasso mountain and NO energy was detected, validating Penrose OR. But they then claimed the assumptions must be wrong and changed the superposition separation distance 4 orders of magnitude larger, smearing the separation distance. Ironically the smear repeated Tegmark’s apparent ‘mistake’ of 7 orders of magnitude smearing which was disproved, but still wrongly cited as refuting Orch OR. By smearing the superposition separation distance the Gran Sass-holes seemingly invalidated both Diosi and Penrose versions, so they then applied it (for no apparent reason other than to refute SOMETHING and claimed to refute Orch OR. Total bullshit. They should be ashamed. Gran Sass-holes! sciencedirect.com/science/ar…

You can change the subject but can’t change the fact AI is clueless about consciousness because it follows cartoon neurocomputation and suppresses Orch OR, the only theory with evidence. Do you disagree?

The statement that the brain is ‘too warm and wet’ for quantum mechanisms is in the same category as ‘the earth is flat and the sun revolves around it.’ As anesthesiologists know, anesthesia acts and consciousness occurs in nonpolar aromatic water-excluding regions which support quantum optical effects.