Replying to @El_Teto_Medina @beyond_capital
Do you think that SETF were bankrolled by the weapons manufacturer's favourite think tank who funded a whole bunch of cutouts. atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/me…
Replying to @350zeee @AngusTaylorMP
Not according to DAMSHEG's lawyers: "There is no reference to emissions "scopes" in the UNFCCC, the Paris Agreement, or any other international law at the treaty or customary level." johnsonlegal.au/the-latest/m…
The scopes of emissions were implemented under the Green House Gas Protocol. wri.org/initiatives/greenhou…
Replying to @advocat21269068
It was the World Resources Institute and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development that instituted the scopes of emissions as part of the Green House Gas Protocol. The scopes of emissions have never seriously been challenged by climate campaigners. wri.org/initiatives/greenhou…
Replying to @Ryandally08
The people who brought you the scopes of emissions (WBCSD) - the mechanics of net zero accounting - also endorse large scale carbon capture and storage like they want to do with the gas we give away. youtu.be/UeMfHXE_zsQ?si=LgDR…
Replying to @philomathyjen @RennickGBR
They found a chink in the voluntary GHG Protocol that implemented the scopes of emissions - the mechanics of net zero.
"WRI and WBCSD created GHG Protocol as an international standard for corporate accounting and reporting emissions, categorizing greenhouse gasses into Scope 1, 2 and 3 based on the source." wri.org/initiatives/greenhou…
Replying to @RennickGBR
The scopes of emissions are a product of NGOs with a focus on 'sustainable development'.
"WRI and WBCSD created GHG Protocol as an international standard for corporate accounting and reporting emissions, categorizing greenhouse gasses into Scope 1, 2 and 3 based on the source."
wri.org/initiatives/greenhou…
Mach Energy were brought unstuck because NSW SEPP 2.20 (1)(c) didn't fully integrate the scopes of emissions.
Replying to @denisrancourt
According to the internet Cass Sunstein's nudge unit briefing piece 'The meaning of masks' was published on 8 April 2020. sabeconomics.org/journal/ReP…
Replying to @MrEwanMorrison
Page 376, Josh uses Emma's term: "and then the super-intelligence killed you."
Perhaps Trump's team have read your book?
Replying to @PeterDClack
@PeterDClack
Canada is becoming the world leader in carbon capture and storage just like its former environment minister Catherine McKenna pronounced it would back in 2016 before she joined the Powering Past Coal Alliance in 2017.
This means that campaigners with The Leap Manifesto and Fossil Fuel Treaty, Naomi Klein and Tzeporah Berman are failing as hard as it is possible to fail.
The pattern of campaigners getting philanthropath funding and failing thoroughly is being repeated everywhere.
prnewswire.com/news-releases…
Replying to @orsontwil @salltweets
As someone who has studied the non profit industrial complex in depth I immediately thought of the popularity of donor advised (anonymous) funding when I first read this article 8 years ago. If academia was included among the many spheres funded by the transhumanist billionaires listed then it might go some way toward explaining how 'women's studies' became 'gender studies'.
Replying to @Polly778899 @PeterDClack
Because they make reflexive investments in carbon capture tech and CO2 storage infrastructure.
They use donor advised funding (a Soros innovation) to anonymously fund leftish NGOs to manufacture consent by convincing activists that fossil fuels can be phased out when in reality CCUS is being phased in.
Replying to @PeterDClack
The night before Greta's "How dare you!" speech Guterres sent his special advisor Robert Orr along to a meeting of the Oil and Gas Climate Initiative who had issued an embargoed media release announcing their "Kickstarter" CCUS initiative. wrongkindofgreen.org/2019/10…
Replying to @orsontwil @salltweets
"I found exceedingly rich, white men with enormous cultural influence are funding the transgender lobby and various transgender organizations. These include but are not limited to Jennifer Pritzker (a male who identifies as transgender); George Soros; Martine Rothblatt (a male who identifies as transgender and transhumanist); Tim Gill (a gay man); Drummond Pike; Warren and Peter Buffett; Jon Stryker (a gay man); Mark Bonham (a gay man); and Ric Weiland (a deceased gay man whose philanthropy is still LGBT-oriented)." thefederalist.com/2018/02/20…
Replying to @salltweets @VirtualMirth
No accident at all. Just ask the transhumanist billionaires like Martine Rothblatt that Jennifer Bilek exposed.
Female experts on CEDAW played their part to sabotage the SDA. Elizabeth Broderick was the Sex Discrimination Commissioner when it happened. law.unimelb.edu.au/__data/as…
Wow! Living in Australia while the government is a global innovator in digital censorship is a trip!
I would never have imagined that a term like "sock puppet" would be better defined in draft legislation than a term like "harm". infrastructure.gov.au/sites/…
Replying to @robinmonotti
Comports with Herman Daly's 'rights to pollute' framework for natural capital accounting to manage throughput of resources that was presented to the World Bank (1988-1994).




