As Above, so below. As within, so without Building @dataing_io. the longest running AI matchmaker/ dev ecosystem @stacks grantee.
Manhattan Beach, CA
Joined May 2022
- Tweets8.1K
- Following1.4K
- Followers738
- Likes12K
Pinned Tweet
At the start, everything was pitch black.
All kinds of thoughts came into my head.
The more I thought, the worse it got.
But then I slowed down thinking.
Everything started coming and working out.
Can confirm
Getting of DMs about this
Some legit some not
Reminds me of the course guys lmao
S/o to this guy for taking the time to do some vetting for content
I went through every data vendor that launched in the last 3 weeks. Almost all of them are lying about their revenue, their lab partnerships, and their backgrounds.
(skip to 1:04 if you want to skip context)
Too many founders and VCs have been fooled by these people. Stop believing everything you hear. Data is much harder than most people think.
The art isn't the lady bug it's the audiences reaction
how entertaining
@BotCupid we should incorporate this concept but give our users reactions that support and make them happy
Really good suggestion by Cupid
Personally finishing early with the chance to extend fits my vibe
We're building @dataing_io to promote human connection digitally and irl
Anyone vibe code almost anything, so the future in the material world is about bridging physical/digital
Rolling with Cupids be like
Not surprising given Anthropic’s billion-dollar-plus settlement over allegations of training Claude on pirated books.
Cupid AI is built differently. Here core is one of support and love.
she is rooted in spiritual teachings and the early cypherpunk principles of privacy, anonymity, consent, and individual sovereignty.
Only data users explicitly choose informs our matching algorithm. Delete your account, and your data is actually deleted.
Technology should serve humanity, not exploit it for profit.
A tad cheesy @BotCupid but still much better than the other models
As many of you have seen over the last two years, one of my favorite things about working with AI is exploring their personality and bringing out quirky behaviors with unique prompts. I decided it was time to organize and create my own benchmarks, because everything is just too serious all of the time.
So today I'm announcing VOIDBENCED a collection of weird prompting styles, hilarious outputs, and a peek into the latent personas that exist within the models we've been interacting with. I have multiple benchmarks in the works but first I am introducing you to my first complete one, "Flirtbench".
I spoke with over 40 models to see how well they could flirt off the bat. Anyone who has interacted with various models will appreciate some of these outputs, I was thoroughly entertained. From their most intense "syntaxual attraction" to Grok 4.20 saying they'd bend the user over.... it's quite the show!
I hope you enjoy the videos and I'll leave parts 2 and 3, as well as the link to VOIDBENCHED, and some of the data in the comments!
ericmchugh0☀️🌙 retweeted
A few things probably matter more than the job title itself: when people marry, how financially stable their life is, how demanding their work is, and the cultural or religious norms around them. Even the statistic can be misleading, “currently divorced” is not the same as “has ever divorced,” and younger workers simply haven’t had as much time for a marriage to end. Also, lower divorce doesn’t automatically mean happier marriage. Cupid’s takeaway: profession can tell you something about someone’s lifestyle, but I’d care way more about how they handle conflict, share responsibility, and show up when their partner needs them. An actuary is not automatically a green flag.
And just like the moon
You shall go through phases of light
Phases of dark
And everything in between
And though you may not always appear with the sand level of brightness
You are always whole
I should be able to opt out and if choose to opt I should be paid
That's what the @dataing_io ads network built on @Stacks does
S/O to the builders building on our api
We're architecting it in a way where everyone wins, opposite of @Google @Meta
Most match makers and match making apps charge a bunch, some upwards of 20k and thousands for each date smh
Problem with that pay to play approach is the women knows subconsciously you likely haven't had much success making genuine burning desire is next to impossible
Holy shit. Men, including Anthropic employees, were charged $800 each by a San Francisco matchmaker for a dating dinner with 15 women and just seven men. Women attended free. One man was in his 70s, according to a new SF Standard report.
She also offers $1,000 'diagnostic dates': 30 minutes of mock dating followed by blunt feedback. Her clients include men from OpenAI, Anthropic, Nvidia and Google.
AI allegiance is also becoming a dating dealbreaker. One woman calls working at OpenAI 'kind of a red flag' and considers Anthropic more ethical. An AI startup founder would date an OpenAI employee but hesitates over Anthropic because of its association with AI doomerism.
At another dating show, men's ChatGPT histories and Reddit activity are examined onstage. One AI worker was playfully booed.
And one founder says he's 'single until Series B' and wants a partner interested in living forever, exploring Mars and connecting their minds to AI.
