flowmaxxin (@flowmaxxin) header
flowmaxxin (@flowmaxxin) profile picture

flowmaxxin

Onchain
Joined October 2025
Photo by flowmaxxin (@flowmaxxin)Photo by flowmaxxin (@flowmaxxin)
CAPITALISM IS NOT THE PROBLEM Academics and young people keep blaming capitalism for the affordability crisis they're experiencing ranging from high debt, paycheck-to-paycheck living, expensive homes. They’re right that something is broken. They’re just pointing at the wrong thing. Capitalism didn’t rob your savings. Monetary inflation did. Imagine the entire money supply is 10 bananas and you carefully save 1. Then the government and central bank expand the supply to 100 bananas to fund whatever they want. Your banana didn’t change, but its value just got diluted by 90%. That’s not a market failure. That’s deliberate expansion of the money supply transferring purchasing power from people who already hold currency to whoever receives the new money first. The second- and third-order effects are what hit you next. People who already have capital (or who get the new money early) don’t sit on devaluing bananas. They dump them into scarce assets that can rise in nominal value, especially housing and land. Prices of those assets rise not mainly because of “greed” or “capitalism,” but because more currency is chasing a relatively fixed supply of real goods. Future buyers then face higher entry prices with wages that lag the asset inflation. Productivity can rise while real purchasing power for big-ticket items stagnates or falls. That’s the quiet mechanism. Blaming free exchange, private property, and profit for a problem created by centralized control over the money supply is like blaming the thermometer for the fever. Hard money (or at least money whose supply can’t be expanded at will by a central authority) removes the silent transfer. Everything else is downstream.
47
Deep state coup on NVDA
My Experience With the Leaders of the Jensen Coup At the start of 2025, numerous Washington, D.C. based NGOs began spreading the false rumor that DeepSeek smuggled 50,000 H100 GPUs. Speaking from firsthand experience, organized think tanks, PR firms, and lobbyists aggressively personally attacked anyone merely asking them to provide evidence. Call them the Export Controls Deep State, or if that’s too right-coded for you, use the Obama-administration term “Foreign Policy Blob”. The same charlatans are attempting a coup on Jensen Huang, the most indispensable CEO to America’s AI success. If we lost Sam, we have Dario. If we lost Dario, we have Demis. Nvidia is singular. The gap between Nvidia and AMD would be wider than the gap between OpenAI and Mistral, Europe’s top AI company whose models don’t rank in the top 40. This is an attempt to derail the most important company for the American AI industry. The entire coup against Jensen Huang can be halted by asking a single question. What evidence is there that Alice Huang is actually a Chinese spy? The answer, unsurprisingly, is absolutely zero. There is not even the pretense of a factual basis for the claim. “We made it the fuck up, and if you have a problem with that, what are you, pro-China?” Taking away this obvious falsehood, the coup against Jensen boils down to a celebrity tabloid headline. Moreover, without the entirely fabricated ‘national security relevance’, these tabloid headlines would be at best a weekend story in the New York Post. Another basic question: if there is evidence of ‘national security relevance’, why not charge Jensen? The basic answer: they lack even the evidence to justify a warrant. During my time in DC, I was advised repeatedly to stay on the good side of the Export Controls Deep State. I was added to many groups for boosting content spreading the 50,000 H100s conspiracy theory. In several groups, I asked whether there was any evidence behind this claim. One group administrator, who was and still is affiliated with Georgetown, explicitly told me to “focus on bolstering the narrative”. I later posted Patel’s pseudo-correction and was subsequently removed from all of these groups. What you need to understand about the Export Controls Deep State is that they have no incentive to be remotely honest, because they are entirely unaccountable. To this day, they provided zero evidence for their claim. Internet historians later traced the origin of this claim to a tweet by Dylan Patel of Semianalysis. Patel later said they lied about his tweet and that his claim counted legally obtained hardware. Affiliates of universities and think tanks promote these baseless claims and are taken seriously by the national press. In reality, their theories about Nvidia are as kooky as the guy who shot up Comet Pizza. The reason they succeed is not only because they are unaccountable, but because they constantly use their unaccountability to attack others. There are broader foreign policy implications to these observations about political power, but I will stick to what I witnessed firsthand. After Trump’s election, his administration began lifting the export control cap. Surprising no one informed about this policy, America widened our lead. Deepseek was closest to catching up to American models in January 2025, literally the moment of peak export controls. Based on communication with members of the administration, the evidence that a) the export controls were net negative and b) the export controls deep state was acting in bad faith, that as soon as the situation was described accurately, the administration began rolling them back. Part of this is because many of these NGOs are funded by foundations like Open Philanthropy / Coefficient Giving, who explicitly intend to harm American AI companies because they believe American AI will “cause human extinction”. As a result, the BIS under the Biden administration was used as an informal cudgel against AI companies, both to censor in favor of their worldview, as seen in the Gemini scandal, as well as to backdoor regulation to slow down American AI broadly. While they love to accuse everyone else of being traitors, the Export Controls Deep State makes Americans poorer and the American military, to the extent they use AI, weaker. Most of the time, the best you can do is ignore them. They really are unaccountable and the personal retribution isn’t worth the cost. But now, they are leading a coup against the AI industry’s most indispensable man based on lies and tabloid gossip. Everyone should understand that the Export Controls Deep State has never provided any evidence for their claims nor any reason for their word to be trusted.
4
825
This is amazing @thepirateface Open source models as torrents so you can just download p2p
1
112
The real pressure on NVDA isn’t just the Jensen drama or macro noise, it’s Anthropic quietly driving the policy fight. Their incentives are structurally opposed. For Anthropic to win and justify a sky-high valuation, they need high-margin closed-source frontier models to dominate, with open-weight models heavily restricted or de facto banned (or at least sandboxed to the point they’re not competitive). Wide availability of strong open models collapses pricing power, enables local/self-hosted use, and turns inference into a commodity that anyone with GPUs can serve. For NVIDIA to keep compounding, the opposite is required: open models everywhere, running on as much hardware as possible. More open weights = more developers, more fine-tunes, more agents, more total tokens, more GPUs sold. Jensen’s public push for open weights and the Open Secure AI Alliance wasn’t charity, it was core to the business model. When one side needs the open ecosystem throttled and the other needs it to explode, the “safety” and “national security” arguments start looking a lot like competitive strategy. Show me the incentive and I’ll show you the outcome.
18
140
15
909
40,186
Deep state got a 16 yr old to publish their opinion on what would serve NVDA shareholders best….
Jensen Huang must go We argue in @TheEconomist that his position is untenable "Like many powerful leaders, he came to believe that he was too important for the normal rules to apply to him." But he is not the only one. Howard Lutnick has failed to stem the flow of chips to China. More heads should roll
61
That is why SOCIALISM is so attractive to elites. It allows them to speak in the language of compassion and humanity while building structures of dependency. It provides them moral cover for higher spending, higher taxes, more control, and more bureaucracy, even as those policies reduce productivity, punish work and investment, and trap millions in stagnation. The elite don’t suffer under socialism because they can store their wealth outside of the system, while those who vote for more government often wonder why they are worse off each time.
1
37