Grassroots referee. Here to educate fans and improve their knowledge of the LOTG Trolls and abusive people will be blocked đ Married to a wonderful husband
Joined August 2021
- Tweets69.3K
- Following359
- Followers634
- Likes6K
Pinned Tweet
If people want to abuse me or not have any interest in a mature conversation, I'll have no hesitation in blocking people especially if you are an account with 012345 in your name.
Jay Bothroyd once again showing he doesn't know the laws. There is no way you can justify that challenge as careless rather than reckless
If games weren't played because of a muddy touchline by the AR then non-league would never finish. This part of the pitch is mud with no grass on 99% of grass pitches by November especially at step 5&6.
Unsurprisingly this team lost but I'm sure that has nothing to do with ut.
Iâm all for playing matches but that was an abysmal decision to allow that game to be played out in them conditions. Itâs the volunteers who now have to pick up the pieces. Worrying thing we warned this would happen but no one listens
Ref earns ÂŁ84 and goes home happy.
@nwcfl
1) The player is already nearly on the floor before the ball is in play so no decision to make
2) The defender takes a risk but not for me, the attacker knows he's not getting the ball so falls down
3) Arm in an expected position, no way is that handball
This sums up the attitude of fans, they feel they can say whatever they want but if an official dares to react they are out of order and fans can't take it.
This looks like the player jumping swings their arm and catches the opponent in the face which is a justified YC
Someone, somewhere, please explain to me how this is a foul. Never mind a second yellow. Absolute nonsense again. Itâs just boring moaning about the standard of officiating but yesterdayâs was an arrogant twat. The lino laughing at one of our fans at full time summed it up. Itâs not good enough.
This incident looks similar to the Doku challenge against Liverpool which split opinion and was voted 3-2 correct by the KMI panel and I think this is less of a foul as there doesn't seem to be contact by the defender's boot on the attacker unlike the Doku challenge
Sunderland fans joining Leeds fans in not knowing the laws. As the stoppage was as a result of 2 teammates colliding neither have to go off despite having treatment and play restarts with a drop ball to the goalkeeper as the goalkeeper had the ball #SUNLEE
The player was down holding his head so Stuart Atwell was 100% correct to stop the play, Leeds United fans showing how little they understand the laws #SUNLEE
No sympathy with a player who takes too long on a throw in and has it overturned, you have a verbal and visual countdown so if you ignore that then it is 100% your fault #SUNLEE
another example of a media channel who can't get the basic laws of the game right. Reckless is a yellow card offence.
This is one of the reasons fans are so uneducated on the laws as they are not educated on them by the media.
This quoted post is unavailable.
How can he complain about that? It is a clear YC. Disgraceful from both sets of players surrounding Kavanagh and more than 1 player putting hands on him. I'd love to see the PL clamp down on that and give refs the confidence to show every player a YC for surrounding them #CHETOT
This looks like great teamwork from the referee and AR. There is a player in the middle that looks to be in an offside position when the cross comes in then clearly challenges the defender for the ball, assuming he is in an offside position it's a great decision
There seems to be a few times this season that play has been stopped due to a flat ball. Another procurement from the Premier League gone wrong #IPSNFO
Whichever way this is given it's going to upset one side or the other but it further proves how the laws are subjective and both sides could be justified in law for this. We also keep hearing people say they want refs to reject the review so lets hope them same people praise this
#IPSNFO â 48â
After VAR review for a possible denial of an obvious goal-scoring opportunity (DOGSO), the referee issued a yellow card to Diop for stopping a promising attack.
REF: âIt's a heavy touch, with the defender inside and he knocks the ball away from the goal â Iâm going to go direct free-kick and yellow cardâ.
REF ANNOUNCEMENT: âAfter review, there is a foul by Ipswich No.6. However, because the player knocks it to the right side of the goal, the final decision is direct free-kick and a yellow card to No.6â.
James Stevens retweeted
The VAR got involved for a red.
The referee rejected the red card and decided it was only worthy of a yellow.
Once at the monitor the referee can do whatever he wants.
James Stevens retweeted
I think the referee has made the correct decision to reject the red card and give a yellow.
The speed the ball moves suggests it was a possible scoring chance rather than obvious.
Close call though and more a red than Struijk.
When people want the clear and obvious bar removed for VAR you will have more incidents like that of reviews that are rejected at the monitor and this will show it won't remove controversy #IPSNFO
I agree with the final outcome although it will go down as a mistake for VAR due to it not being a red card #IPSNFO
This isa certain foul but due to the heavy touch I'm not totally convinced it's DOGSO due to the defender next to him and possibly the goalkeeper so this should be a yellow card. #IPSNFO
This isa certain foul but due to the heavy touch I'm not totally convinced it's DOGSO due to the defender next to him and possibly the goalkeeper so this should be a yellow card. #IPSNFO