๐ธ๐ฌ Hong-Eng Koh (้ซๅฎ่ฃ) retweeted
It's now obvious that US intelligence agencies carried out another coup, but not against a foreign head of state this time, but rather against Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang.
First, US spies and China hawks spread the unsubstantiated rumor that the Chinese businesswoman with whom he had an affair, Alice Huang, was a spy.
Next, they forced him to resign.
Now, US spies are acknowledging that there is no evidence that she is a spy. But they don't care, because they accomplished their goal: removing Jensen Huang.
Who benefits? China hawks and Silicon Valley monopolists.
China hawks have been demanding much harsher US policies against China, as part of the chip war / tech war / Cold War Two. Jensen Huang had lobbied hard against these (because he and Nvidia profited, of course).
Some US Big Tech corporations also benefit, because Jensen Huang had been an outspoken advocate of open-source AI models. OpenAI and Anthropic have been lobbying the US government to ban these, because Chinese open-source models are much cheaper and more competitive, and have been eating their lunch.
News: The US intel community is still working to understand the relationship between a Chinese businesswoman who had an affair with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and the Chinese government, with multiple sources telling CNN that the intelligence collected on her to date does not prove that she was acting as a spy for Beijing.
cnn.com/2026/11/12/politics/โฆ
๐ธ๐ฌ Hong-Eng Koh (้ซๅฎ่ฃ) retweeted
So, the "Chinese spy" was not actually a spy, and the whole story was racist fear-mongering about China
๐ธ๐ฌ Hong-Eng Koh (้ซๅฎ่ฃ) retweeted
Ahhh so the pieces are finally falling into place! They needed to fabricate the China spy angle to force Jensen out and pave the way for someone who serves the real master of the United States
๐ธ๐ฌ Hong-Eng Koh (้ซๅฎ่ฃ) retweeted
Now that Jensen had to resign suddenly the Chinese woman is no longer a spy
News: The US intel community is still working to understand the relationship between a Chinese businesswoman who had an affair with Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang and the Chinese government, with multiple sources telling CNN that the intelligence collected on her to date does not prove that she was acting as a spy for Beijing.
cnn.com/2026/11/12/politics/โฆ
๐ธ๐ฌ Hong-Eng Koh (้ซๅฎ่ฃ) retweeted
So let me get this straightโฆ
The FBI has been investigating Alice Huang for at least a year, yet STILL cannot establish whether she was acting as a Chinese spy.
Attorney General Todd Blanche confirmed that neither the DOJ nor the FBI has reached a conclusion.
Multiple intelligence sources say there is no evidence proving she knowingly funneled information to Beijing. Even CIA officials arenโt convinced, and officials have reportedly called the spy characterization inaccurate and overblown.
Yet Jensen Huang was forced to resign?
Are you freaking kidding me? This is an absolute disgrace.
๐ธ๐ฌ Hong-Eng Koh (้ซๅฎ่ฃ) retweeted
THINK ABOUT IT.
- Bill Gates had lots of illicit girlfriendsโno problem.
- Elon Musk has multiple children with multiple womenโno problem.
- Dario Amodei dated a Chinese woman, Jade Wang, before marrying Cami Clark, who pitched a pornography business to none other than Jeffrey Epsteinโno problem.
- But Jensen Huang commits old-fashioned infidelityโand this is such a big problem that he has to resign?
Doesnโt make sense.
Hereโs the real story.
.
CHAPTER ONE: BIDENโS CHIP WAR
Jensen Huang of Nvidia was puzzled. It was 2022, and his video-graphics processors had become globally popular as the heart of high-end computing across the planet.
But that autumn, Biden violated the World Trade Organizationโs most fundamental principles. He ordered the worldโs makers of advanced semiconductor chips and chipmaking equipment (in the Netherlands, Taiwan and Japan) to stop sales to China.
Bidenโs administration implied that the chips were for Chinaโs military gear, but this was a lie. The USโs own security establishment admitted that 99.9 per cent were used for civilian purposes, like medical technology and AI computing.
Huang was dismayed. He could no longer sell Nvidiaโs A100 and H100 to China.
.
CHAPTER TWO: SOLVING A PROBLEM
Jensen Huang was a problem-solver. In February of 2024, Nvidia launched the H20, a made-for-China AI chip less powerful than its US-only top model.
That way he could keep the US government happy but also have something to sell to the Chinese.
Not everyone in the US was happy about this, and export rules fluctuated.
.
CHAPTER THREE: THE DEEPSEEK MOMENT
In January 2025, a nerdy young man from the Chinese finance industry announced that his firm Deepseek had quickly and cheaply created a high-efficiency open-weight AI.
The implication was huge: the Chinese were finding ways to develop top level AI functionality without massive clusters of top-tier Nvidia GPUs.
Jensen Huang knew he had to respond urgently to keep his place in the China market. He flew to meet trade officials in Beijing in the middle of April and vowed to make "every effort" to serve the Chinese.
The US anti-China hawks had been quietly mobilizingโand made an announcement. In April of 2025, the US banned all export of Jensen Huangโs H20s to China.
Unbelievable! The Nvidia CEO was furious. "Anybody who thought that one chess move to ban China from H20s would cut off their AI ability is deeply uninformed," Huang told an interviewer at a trade meeting in Taipei.
.
CHAPTER FOUR: HUANGโS SPECIAL SKILL
Then came some rare good news. The Nvidia CEO started lobbying Trump behind the scenes. Huang was a master negotiator โ and his efforts proved successful.
In the middle of July, 2025, Huang was back in Chinaโhis third trip in 12 months.
Huang appeared without his signature black leather jacket. Instead, he wore a traditional Chinese tang suit, and made some of his speech in Mandarin.
Washington had cleared the way for Nvidia to export the H20 to China, he said. Weโre back!
Trump had demanded a cash cut of H20 sales in return for approving the exportsโUS government policy appeared to be literally for sale.
.
CHAPTER FIVE: SPOOKS WERE NOT HAPPY
Huang was moving chips to China again, and the anti-China hawks in the US government were unhappyโand so were the spooks.
Thereโs a widespread tendency to visualize the US intelligence community as right-leaning hard men, Trumpites in black suits.
This was the opposite of the truth. The CIA leadership greatly preferred the simple, blanket negativity towards โthe enemyโ characteristic of the Democratic Party. With Russians, Chinese, and North Koreans portrayed as cartoon villains, black ops were justifiable.
But for all his bluster, Trump had a propensity towards treating the leaders of Russia, China and even North Korea, as actual humans who could be negotiated with.
This transactional approach was enormously problematic for the CIA, which needed cartoon villains to justify their annual budget of more than US$15 billion.
And Trumpโs habit of parachuting unsuitable new leaders in to command the intelligence communityโsuch as the widely disliked Mike Pompeoโcrystalized the negativity, as CIA chroniclers have written.
.
CHAPTER SIX: A TWIST IN THE TALE
Jensen Huangโs celebrations were short-lived. In an unexpected twist, China in September 2025 said it did not want Nvidia chips and would no longer buy them.
- US$15 billion in sales projections vanished.
- Nvidia had to write off a reported $5.5 billion in inventory losses.
- The company had now completely lost access to China's AI market, estimated at US$50 billion.
- And hard evidence was emerging that Chinese companies were building alternatives even for CUDA (a unique element in Nvidia chips).
Huang wanted more positivity from the US. Nvidia was a US firm, and it went from having a 95% market share in China to 0%. โI canโt imagine any policymaker thinking that thatโs a good idea,โ he told reporters.
.
CHAPTER SEVEN: AGAIN, HE SOLVES THE PROBLEM
But Huangโs extraordinary skill in dealing with Trump paid off again, and by mid-2026, the Nvidia business found a complex equilibrium had emerged in its China business.
Huang had (in December 2025) persuaded the US President to allow Nvidia to sell even the high-powered H200 chip to China, as long as the US government got 25% of the take. So a range of Nvidia chips could again be sold in China.
- Other Nvidia chips were arriving in China via the black market.
- There were suspicions that companies in Singapore and Malaysia, such as Megaspeed, were flouting export restrictions, also delivering chips.
- Some Nvidia chips were stuck in Hong Kong, trapped by the confusing, ever-changing rules, but were expected to be released eventually.
- On the downside (from Huangโs point of view), new China-origin chips, notably Huaweiโs Ascend 950, were catching up with advanced capabilities that mimicked those of Nvidia.
In short, China was back in the game.
.
CHAPTER EIGHT: TAKING HIM DOWN
Something had to be done. China had to be dealt with. But first, Huang had to be taken down.
The US anti-China hawks saw Huangโs success in making deals with Trump as a key part of the problem. It was an element which had to be surgically removed.
The CIA and their partners in the western mainstream media sprang into action.
In October 2026, the US intelligence community told New York Times reporters that there were suspicions that Huangโs mistress, Alice Huang Le, was a Chinese spy.
It provided no evidence.
The allegation was plainly ridiculousโthe flow of legitimate and illegitimate chips across the border was no secret, and the idea that discussions about the detailed minutiae of nano-level semiconductor engineering could be exchanged during pillow talk was ridiculous, even comedic.
But when the US intelligence community and the mainstream media join forces, theyโre virtually invincible.
At this moment in the process, the complicit media are playing its role. A typical headline was that in the Economist yesterday:
โJensen Huang must resign.โ
.
EPILOGUE
Jensen Huang resigned.
Trump has been weakened.
The worldโs public has been fooled with the โhoneypotโ story.
Chinaโs Huawei is pressing aheadโwith new, powerful versions of its Ascend chips slated to come out in 2027 and 2028.
.
.
๐ธ๐ฌ Hong-Eng Koh (้ซๅฎ่ฃ) retweeted
๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐'๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
This is being treated as if it were just a normal company sale. ๐๐ญ ๐ฐ๐๐ฌ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ.
Toshiba had one of the worldโs most important memory-chip businesses, the chips that store data in phones and computers. The trouble did not start in that factory. It started at ๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐, Toshibaโs American nuclear company, which collapsed under huge losses. To fill the hole, Toshiba had to sell its best asset.
What followed was a fight over who would own those chips. ๐
๐จ๐ฑ๐๐จ๐ง๐ง was ready to pay a very high price, ๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐ฐ๐๐ฌ ๐ฉ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ก๐๐ ๐๐ฌ๐ข๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ ๐จ๐ ๐ข๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ญ๐ข๐๐ฌ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐ก๐ข๐ง๐. A US private equity firm, ๐๐๐ข๐ง ๐๐๐ฉ๐ข๐ญ๐๐ฅ, brought in ๐๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ and other US companies, and that group won. In 2018 the business was sold for about $18 billion. Toshiba was left as a minority owner. A year later the name was changed to ๐๐ข๐จ๐ฑ๐ข๐.
They said Japan would keep control. ๐ ๐๐จ ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐๐ฎ๐ฒ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ. A few years later ๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐๐ซ๐ง ๐๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ญ๐๐ฅ, another US company, came back with a plan to fold ๐๐ข๐จ๐ฑ๐ข๐ into a US-run company. Japanese officials were worried about losing the chipmaker. One trade paper put it simply: the aim was to take control from Japan to the United States.
First came a financial hole. Then the real question appeared: who is allowed to own a company that makes strategic chips. I have already written about the same pattern with ๐๐ข๐ค๐๐จ๐ค and ๐๐ฅ๐ฌ๐ญ๐จ๐ฆ. ๐๐ก๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ ๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฅ๐๐ฐ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฌ๐๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ. ๐๐ก๐ ๐จ๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐ซ๐จ๐ฅ.
Be informed, not entertained.
๐ธ๐ฌ Hong-Eng Koh (้ซๅฎ่ฃ) retweeted
๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐, ๐๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐๐๐
Jensen Huang admits an affair. Thatโs his private life, and I donโt really care.
๐๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ข๐ง๐ญ๐๐ซ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ฌ ๐ฆ๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐๐๐ฆ๐ ๐ง๐๐ฑ๐ญ. The US press and US intelligence turn it into a Chinese spy story, Congress wants a closed-door briefing, and all of a sudden the pressure is on ๐๐ฏ๐ข๐๐ข๐โ๐ฌ chips, and on who gets to control the company that makes them.
๐โ๐ฏ๐ ๐ฌ๐๐๐ง ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐๐๐จ๐ซ๐. ๐๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ก๐จ๐ฐ ๐๐๐ฌ๐ก๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ญ๐จ๐ง ๐ฅ๐๐๐ฌ๐ก๐๐ฌ ๐ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐๐ง๐ฒ, ๐จ๐ซ ๐ญ๐๐ค๐๐ฌ ๐ข๐ญ.
โข ๐๐ข๐ค๐๐จ๐ค: Americans use it every day, it gets called a national security threat, then it is pushed into a US-majority joint venture. Look at the structure and you see the policy: ๐๐ฆ๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐๐ง ๐ข๐ง๐ฏ๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐จ๐ซ๐ฌ ๐ข๐ง ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐ซ๐จ๐ฅ, ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ ๐ข๐ง๐๐ฅ ๐จ๐ฐ๐ง๐๐ซ ๐๐ฎ๐ญ ๐๐จ๐ฐ๐ง ๐ญ๐จ ๐ ๐ฆ๐ข๐ง๐จ๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ.
โข ๐๐ฅ๐ฌ๐ญ๐จ๐ฆ: a French industrial champion, including the turbines in Franceโs nuclear plants. They arrest an executive, build a huge corruption case, and in 2014 ๐๐ฅ๐ฌ๐ญ๐จ๐ฆ ๐ฌ๐จ๐ฅ๐ ๐ข๐ญ๐ฌ ๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐ ๐ฒ ๐๐ฎ๐ฌ๐ข๐ง๐๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐ญ๐จ ๐๐๐ง๐๐ซ๐๐ฅ ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ญ๐ซ๐ข๐, ๐ข๐ญ๐ฌ ๐๐ฆ๐๐ซ๐ข๐๐๐ง ๐ซ๐ข๐ฏ๐๐ฅ. ๐๐ฅ๐๐๐ญ๐๐ฅ, from the same industrial family, had already been hit with a US FCPA case.
โข ๐๐จ๐ฌ๐ก๐ข๐๐: after losses at ๐๐๐ฌ๐ญ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐ก๐จ๐ฎ๐ฌ๐, it had to sell its memory-chip business, one of the most important in the world, and a ๐๐๐ข๐ง ๐๐๐ฉ๐ข๐ญ๐๐ฅ-led group, with ๐๐ฉ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ and other US firms in it, bought the thing.
๐ ๐๐จ๐งโ๐ญ ๐๐ฎ๐ฒ ๐ญ๐ก๐ ๐ข๐๐๐ ๐ญ๐ก๐๐ญ ๐ญ๐ก๐ข๐ฌ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ ๐ ๐๐จ๐ข๐ง๐๐ข๐๐๐ง๐๐. ๐๐ญ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฐ๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ญ๐๐ง ๐๐จ๐ฐ๐ง ๐๐ฌ ๐ฉ๐จ๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ฒ. Franceโs ๐๐๐ซ๐ข said years ago that it is hard to tell โmoralizingโ trade from โdefending strictly American interests.โ In ๐
๐จ๐ซ๐๐ข๐ ๐ง ๐๐๐๐๐ข๐ซ๐ฌ, Farrell and Newman wrote that for more than twenty years the United States has used finance, information and technology as weapons, against enemies and against friends.
I keep seeing the same sequence. First the scare, the investigation, or the fine. Then the forced sale, the joint venture, or a leash around the companyโs neck. ๐๐ก๐ ๐ฅ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฎ๐๐ ๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐ฅ๐๐ฐ ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฌ๐๐๐ฎ๐ซ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ. ๐๐ก๐ ๐จ๐๐ฃ๐๐๐ญ๐ข๐ฏ๐ ๐ข๐ฌ ๐๐จ๐ง๐ญ๐ซ๐จ๐ฅ.
Thatโs where ๐๐ฏ๐ข๐๐ข๐ is now. They came in through the CEOโs private life. The aim, in my view, is the same as it was with the others: ๐๐๐๐ข๐๐ ๐ฐ๐ก๐จ ๐ฆ๐๐ฒ ๐จ๐ฐ๐ง, ๐๐ง๐ ๐ฐ๐ก๐จ ๐ฆ๐๐ฒ ๐ฌ๐๐ฅ๐ฅ, ๐ฌ๐ญ๐ซ๐๐ญ๐๐ ๐ข๐ ๐ญ๐๐๐ก๐ง๐จ๐ฅ๐จ๐ ๐ฒ.
I set out the sources and the policy-paper passages in the full article here angelogiuliano.substack.com/โฆ if you want to go through the case properly.
Be informed, not entertained.
๐ธ๐ฌ Hong-Eng Koh (้ซๅฎ่ฃ) retweeted
China is such a useful excuse for internal American power struggles. If China didn't exist it would have to be invented.
๐ธ๐ฌ Hong-Eng Koh (้ซๅฎ่ฃ) retweeted
My Experience With the Leaders of the Jensen Coup
At the start of 2025, numerous Washington, D.C. based NGOs began spreading the false rumor that DeepSeek smuggled 50,000 H100 GPUs. Speaking from firsthand experience, organized think tanks, PR firms, and lobbyists aggressively personally attacked anyone merely asking them to provide evidence. Call them the Export Controls Deep State, or if thatโs too right-coded for you, use the Obama-administration term โForeign Policy Blobโ.
The same charlatans are attempting a coup on Jensen Huang, the most indispensable CEO to Americaโs AI success. If we lost Sam, we have Dario. If we lost Dario, we have Demis. Nvidia is singular. The gap between Nvidia and AMD would be wider than the gap between OpenAI and Mistral, Europeโs top AI company whose models donโt rank in the top 40. This is an attempt to derail the most important company for the American AI industry.
The entire coup against Jensen Huang can be halted by asking a single question. What evidence is there that Alice Huang is actually a Chinese spy? The answer, unsurprisingly, is absolutely zero. There is not even the pretense of a factual basis for the claim. โWe made it the fuck up, and if you have a problem with that, what are you, pro-China?โ
Taking away this obvious falsehood, the coup against Jensen boils down to a celebrity tabloid headline. Moreover, without the entirely fabricated โnational security relevanceโ, these tabloid headlines would be at best a weekend story in the New York Post. Another basic question: if there is evidence of โnational security relevanceโ, why not charge Jensen? The basic answer: they lack even the evidence to justify a warrant.
During my time in DC, I was advised repeatedly to stay on the good side of the Export Controls Deep State. I was added to many groups for boosting content spreading the 50,000 H100s conspiracy theory. In several groups, I asked whether there was any evidence behind this claim. One group administrator, who was and still is affiliated with Georgetown, explicitly told me to โfocus on bolstering the narrativeโ. I later posted Patelโs pseudo-correction and was subsequently removed from all of these groups.
What you need to understand about the Export Controls Deep State is that they have no incentive to be remotely honest, because they are entirely unaccountable. To this day, they provided zero evidence for their claim. Internet historians later traced the origin of this claim to a tweet by Dylan Patel of Semianalysis. Patel later said they lied about his tweet and that his claim counted legally obtained hardware.
Affiliates of universities and think tanks promote these baseless claims and are taken seriously by the national press. In reality, their theories about Nvidia are as kooky as the guy who shot up Comet Pizza. The reason they succeed is not only because they are unaccountable, but because they constantly use their unaccountability to attack others. There are broader foreign policy implications to these observations about political power, but I will stick to what I witnessed firsthand.
After Trumpโs election, his administration began lifting the export control cap. Surprising no one informed about this policy, America widened our lead. Deepseek was closest to catching up to American models in January 2025, literally the moment of peak export controls.
Based on communication with members of the administration, the evidence that a) the export controls were net negative and b) the export controls deep state was acting in bad faith, that as soon as the situation was described accurately, the administration began rolling them back.
Part of this is because many of these NGOs are funded by foundations like Open Philanthropy / Coefficient Giving, who explicitly intend to harm American AI companies because they believe American AI will โcause human extinctionโ. As a result, the BIS under the Biden administration was used as an informal cudgel against AI companies, both to censor in favor of their worldview, as seen in the Gemini scandal, as well as to backdoor regulation to slow down American AI broadly.
While they love to accuse everyone else of being traitors, the Export Controls Deep State makes Americans poorer and the American military, to the extent they use AI, weaker.
Most of the time, the best you can do is ignore them. They really are unaccountable and the personal retribution isnโt worth the cost. But now, they are leading a coup against the AI industryโs most indispensable man based on lies and tabloid gossip. Everyone should understand that the Export Controls Deep State has never provided any evidence for their claims nor any reason for their word to be trusted.
๐ธ๐ฌ Hong-Eng Koh (้ซๅฎ่ฃ) retweeted
I kept thinking this Jensen saga doesnโt make sense - but this explanation would make sense - OSS is too big of a threat to Anthropic.
This quoted post is unavailable.
๐ธ๐ฌ Hong-Eng Koh (้ซๅฎ่ฃ) retweeted
Eric Schmidt's private life in 1 million times more messy than Jensen's but there was no coordinated effort to take him out.
Why not?
Eric is the rat king of China Hawks while Jensen wants to sell chips to the Chinese
Elon should be careful
๐ธ๐ฌ Hong-Eng Koh (้ซๅฎ่ฃ) retweeted
So heโs had another affair, but this time with a white woman.
So which country is she spying for then?
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang had another affair with an executive at the company, according to a report from The New York Times.
This is his second known affair, following his relationship with an alleged Chinese spy.
(nytimes.com/2026/11/11/technโฆ)
๐ธ๐ฌ Hong-Eng Koh (้ซๅฎ่ฃ) retweeted
A Chinese billionaire having an affair with a young Chinese woman is a BIGGER story/has a bigger coverage than EPSTEIN scandal.
An affair is a bigger story than raping, torturing, and killing children.
Says a lot.
๐ธ๐ฌ Hong-Eng Koh (้ซๅฎ่ฃ) retweeted
Americans invented a word for bribery so it would stop sounding like bribery.
They called it "lobbying."
A pharmaceutical company that spends $300 million purchasing the votes of legislators who will then block drug price regulation is not, in American law, corrupt.
It is "civically engaged."
A defense contractor that pays a retired general $500,000 a year to advocate for weapons contracts, contracts the general previously approved from the government side, is not a conflict of interest.
It is "private sector expertise."
A senator who receives $2 million from the insurance industry over a career and votes against universal healthcare every single time is not bought.
He is "fiscally responsible."
The genius of American corruption is not that it is hidden.
It is that it is legible, documented, publicly filed, searchable on the internet, and still not called what it is, because the people who would name it are the same people cashing the checks, and the people watching it happen have been trained to call it "democracy."
At least when a Nigerian official takes a bribe, everyone in the room knows what happened.
In Washington, they hold a press conference about it.
When you're so deep undercover that the spy agency isn't even aware you're a spy and is looking for information about you
Replying to @EleanorOlcott
It is also notable that the Chinese spy agency was itself digging for information on Alice Huang.





































