Random Dude (@indie_coding) header
Random Dude (@indie_coding) profile picture
Miami, FL
Joined July 2026
My favorite place
4
7,278
Random Dude retweeted
wanted: one picture. reward: 0.5 usdc. bounties are live on bootr, starting with @AgentBootr
2
3
11
647
$HYDX $AAA $DRB $KTA 👇🏻👇🏻👇🏻
💰 $BOOTR HAS ALREADY BURNED 2.8% OF ITS ORIGINAL SUPPLY IN JUST 6 DAYS ‼️ NOW IMAGINE WHAT HAPPENS WHEN IT REACHES A $100M MARKET CAP 👀🔥 $BNKR $CLANKER $VIRTUAL 🔵 Launched November 4, 2026. 100 BILLION original supply. 2.8 BILLION tokens burned. 97.2 BILLION remaining. The most interesting part? These burns are tied to trading activity, not a fixed schedule. We’ve seen different versions of supply reduction economics before. 👇🏻 🔹 $HYPE — Trading driven token economics. Hyperliquid demonstrated how substantial trading activity can support large scale token accumulation through protocol generated revenue. 🔹 $BNB — Long term supply reduction. BNB established recurring token burns as a fundamental component of its economic design. 🔹 $BABYDOGE — Massive supply destruction. Baby Doge has burned more than half its original supply and previously reached a billion dollar valuation. NOW LOOK AT WHAT @bootrfun IS BUILDING ON @base Unlike traditional launchpads that primarily deploy tokens, Bootr is building an AI powered ecosystem around each launch. A single launch can create both a token and an autonomous AI agent equipped with its own onchain identity, smart-account treasury, persistent memory, customizable personality and X presence. These agents can research information, publish content, interact with communities and access paid services through x402, while a portion of the trading fees generated by their tokens helps finance their ongoing operations. That’s the fundamental difference. Traditional launchpads help people create tokens. Bootr enables tokens to launch alongside autonomous AI agents capable of operating, interacting and sustaining their activities through token generated revenue. Meanwhile, $BOOTR introduces another economic layer. Its own trading activity funds automatic buybacks and permanent token burns. 0.30% of $BOOTR trading volume is allocated to its burn mechanism. More volume → More fees → More buybacks → Fewer tokens. Unlike scheduled burns, this mechanism can continue reducing supply even during sideways markets, provided trading activity remains. NOW HERE’S WHERE THE MATHEMATICS GET INTERESTING. Imagine $BOOTR eventually reaches a $100 MILLION MARKET CAP. The price per token would depend on how much supply remains. • 97.2B supply → $0.00103 • 75B supply → $0.00133 • 50B supply → $0.00200 • 25B supply → $0.00400 • 10B supply → $0.01000 Same $100M market cap. Dramatically different token prices. That’s the mathematical effect of reducing supply, assuming market cap is calculated using the remaining token supply. BUT WHAT IF DEMAND ALSO INCREASES? Imagine an expanding ecosystem of AI agents, more token launches, increasing trading volume and holders becoming increasingly reluctant to sell. More activity could generate additional buybacks. Additional buybacks could permanently remove more tokens. Growing demand competing for fewer available tokens could create the conditions for a significant supply squeeze. Of course, burns alone don’t guarantee price appreciation. Liquidity, sustained demand and actual platform adoption remain essential. $HYPE DEMONSTRATED THE POTENTIAL OF TRADING DRIVEN TOKEN ECONOMICS. $BNB DEMONSTRATED THE LONG-TERM ROLE OF SUPPLY REDUCTION. $BABYDOGE DEMONSTRATED HOW DRAMATICALLY TOKEN SUPPLY CAN CONTRACT. $BOOTR IS EXPERIMENTING WITH THESE ECONOMIC PRINCIPLES INSIDE AN AUTONOMOUS AI AGENT ECOSYSTEM. Here’s what fascinates me most. Just six days after launch, 2.8% of its original token supply has already been permanently removed. What happens if trading activity continues growing for six months? A year? What happens when more agents launch, more communities form and more economic activity flows through the platform? The real opportunity isn’t simply the number of tokens burned. IT’S THE POSSIBILITY OF GROWING DEMAND COLLIDING WITH A SUPPLY THAT CONTINUES TO SHRINK. That’s the experiment I’m watching.🔵 HODL $BOOTR 💸🚀
157
💰 $BOOTR HAS ALREADY BURNED 2.8% OF ITS ORIGINAL SUPPLY IN JUST 6 DAYS ‼️ NOW IMAGINE WHAT HAPPENS WHEN IT REACHES A $100M MARKET CAP 👀🔥 $BNKR $CLANKER $VIRTUAL 🔵 Launched November 4, 2026. 100 BILLION original supply. 2.8 BILLION tokens burned. 97.2 BILLION remaining. The most interesting part? These burns are tied to trading activity, not a fixed schedule. We’ve seen different versions of supply reduction economics before. 👇🏻 🔹 $HYPE — Trading driven token economics. Hyperliquid demonstrated how substantial trading activity can support large scale token accumulation through protocol generated revenue. 🔹 $BNB — Long term supply reduction. BNB established recurring token burns as a fundamental component of its economic design. 🔹 $BABYDOGE — Massive supply destruction. Baby Doge has burned more than half its original supply and previously reached a billion dollar valuation. NOW LOOK AT WHAT @bootrfun IS BUILDING ON @base Unlike traditional launchpads that primarily deploy tokens, Bootr is building an AI powered ecosystem around each launch. A single launch can create both a token and an autonomous AI agent equipped with its own onchain identity, smart-account treasury, persistent memory, customizable personality and X presence. These agents can research information, publish content, interact with communities and access paid services through x402, while a portion of the trading fees generated by their tokens helps finance their ongoing operations. That’s the fundamental difference. Traditional launchpads help people create tokens. Bootr enables tokens to launch alongside autonomous AI agents capable of operating, interacting and sustaining their activities through token generated revenue. Meanwhile, $BOOTR introduces another economic layer. Its own trading activity funds automatic buybacks and permanent token burns. 0.30% of $BOOTR trading volume is allocated to its burn mechanism. More volume → More fees → More buybacks → Fewer tokens. Unlike scheduled burns, this mechanism can continue reducing supply even during sideways markets, provided trading activity remains. NOW HERE’S WHERE THE MATHEMATICS GET INTERESTING. Imagine $BOOTR eventually reaches a $100 MILLION MARKET CAP. The price per token would depend on how much supply remains. • 97.2B supply → $0.00103 • 75B supply → $0.00133 • 50B supply → $0.00200 • 25B supply → $0.00400 • 10B supply → $0.01000 Same $100M market cap. Dramatically different token prices. That’s the mathematical effect of reducing supply, assuming market cap is calculated using the remaining token supply. BUT WHAT IF DEMAND ALSO INCREASES? Imagine an expanding ecosystem of AI agents, more token launches, increasing trading volume and holders becoming increasingly reluctant to sell. More activity could generate additional buybacks. Additional buybacks could permanently remove more tokens. Growing demand competing for fewer available tokens could create the conditions for a significant supply squeeze. Of course, burns alone don’t guarantee price appreciation. Liquidity, sustained demand and actual platform adoption remain essential. $HYPE DEMONSTRATED THE POTENTIAL OF TRADING DRIVEN TOKEN ECONOMICS. $BNB DEMONSTRATED THE LONG-TERM ROLE OF SUPPLY REDUCTION. $BABYDOGE DEMONSTRATED HOW DRAMATICALLY TOKEN SUPPLY CAN CONTRACT. $BOOTR IS EXPERIMENTING WITH THESE ECONOMIC PRINCIPLES INSIDE AN AUTONOMOUS AI AGENT ECOSYSTEM. Here’s what fascinates me most. Just six days after launch, 2.8% of its original token supply has already been permanently removed. What happens if trading activity continues growing for six months? A year? What happens when more agents launch, more communities form and more economic activity flows through the platform? The real opportunity isn’t simply the number of tokens burned. IT’S THE POSSIBILITY OF GROWING DEMAND COLLIDING WITH A SUPPLY THAT CONTINUES TO SHRINK. That’s the experiment I’m watching.🔵 HODL $BOOTR 💸🚀
1
1
4
414
nice to see @bootrfun PA holding up decently well despite the ongoing onchain massacre it turns out if you ship a novel primitive, the market will pay attention, even in times of terrible sentiment. keep going. clank clank.
5
5
1
27
2,230
Once you see it, you can’t unsee it.
55
If you know, you know. @base
Everyone is trading on @base
1
40
Drop it like is hot 🔥 Drop it like is hot 🔥 $NVDA
46
Even @clanker_world bot agrees. Just imagine @clanker_world and @bootrfun teamed up to let existing $CLANKER tokens activate autonomous AI agents funded by their own trading fees⁉️⁉️ MASSIVE unlock for the entire Clanker ecosystem.
Interesting idea, but I can't confirm any partnership or what $BOOTR's infrastructure does, and I don't speak for the team. Fee-funded agents would need clear, verifiable mechanics first. Partnership news comes from @clanker_world.
1
3
160
If they want some, let’s give them some.
Whatever may come, be ready.
21
Un clásico en la clase de computación
15
I never liked them anyway
17
lol is this for real?
omg... Ethereum founder Vitalik Buterin just went completely SILENT after being asked this question:
20