Jasper de Groot (@jasperdegrt) header
Jasper de Groot (@jasperdegrt) profile picture

Fractievoorzitter Wij Zijn Geldrop-Mierlo/VVD. Historicus. Conservatieve klassiek-liberaal. RK-✝️ Recuperabimus aliquando.

Mierlo, Geldrop-Mierlo
Joined April 2009
Photo by Jasper de Groot (@jasperdegrt)Photo by Jasper de Groot (@jasperdegrt)Photo by Jasper de Groot (@jasperdegrt)Photo by Jasper de Groot (@jasperdegrt)Photo by Jasper de Groot (@jasperdegrt)Photo by Jasper de Groot (@jasperdegrt)Photo by Jasper de Groot (@jasperdegrt)Photo by Jasper de Groot (@jasperdegrt)Photo by Jasper de Groot (@jasperdegrt)Photo by Jasper de Groot (@jasperdegrt)
Naar aanleiding van deze (zeker interessante) video over het waarom van dalende geboortecijfer in de VS (een fenomeen dat in heel het westen plaatsvindt, zeker ook bij ons) n kort draadje met de samenvatting en een extra punt wat de video onbenoemd laat. youtube.com/watch?v=HlHKC844…
4
7
2
15
21,480
Jasper de Groot retweeted
Maar de achternaam van elke vrouw komt weer van haar vader, dus hoe ‘wissen’ we die dan weer uit om vrouwen te laten ‘winnen’. Wat. Een. Waanzin.
35
35
2
484
14,290
Jasper de Groot retweeted
Een overwinning waarop precies? “De man”? Een vrouw heeft haar achternaam meestal ook weer van haar vader, dus waar stopt het uitwissen van mannen? Waar stopt de mannenhaat?
15
19
335
7,393
Jasper de Groot retweeted
Wat een totale onzin: - Is Jetten zo top dan? - Peiling zegt niks over toekomst. 3wkn voor TK23 stond PVV nog op 18ztls en D66 op 10ztls bij TK25. - Er is nu al chaos - Dit kabinet is rampzalig. Zsm einde dus. - Wees eerlijk dat jijzelf géén verkiezing wil. - Maart toch al PS27
Stel: We gaan voor die nieuwe verkiezingen? En dan? Maanden van politieke onzekerheid en mogelijk een premier Klaver…. of Halsema. Nederland heeft geen behoefte aan nóg meer politieke chaos, maar aan een koerswijziging. Bekijk de volledige bijdrage in het #Debat #Belastingplan2027 van @GidiMarkuszower over de politieke keuzes die voor ons liggen 👇 youtu.be/-3r1BCJALbY?is=dt0b… via @YouTube
1
1
1
12
935
Jasper de Groot retweeted
I'm sure. Republicans had a chance after Charlie's murder to ruthlessly and systematically root out, arrest, prosecute, and imprison leftist radicals and their donors, funders, and facilitators, but they did almost nothing at all. The Left suffered no real consequence, and now they'll be more emboldened than ever.
Prior to September 10th, 2025, more Redditors had called for Matt Walsh's assassination (12) than Charlie Kirk's (7). Matt Walsh is absolutely going to be a target now.
634
1,389
76
14,374
292,397
Jasper de Groot retweeted
With all due respect, the number of times I spoke with Paul Ryan from my election as governor through the 2024 campaign: zero. And Mitt Romney was attacking me back then because we beat Disney on gender ideology and he is a corporatist. Try demonstrating a little more discernment next time someone is peddling bullsh— to you.
Now THIS is the Ron DeSantis that I wanted to see on the National Stage the last time he ran for President, but didn’t deliver on! Unfortunately, he allowed Mitt Romney and Paul Ryan advise him back then, when Americans knew how RINO’ish those two were back then. So there advise made him look like a fool. But now, his confidence is back … “I saw NO INDICATION that Republican senators were interested in doing conservative change! WHY haven't we done immigration, SHUT OFF H1B visas?! WHY haven't we CODIFIED Trump's immigration executive orders?! Why haven't we STRIPPED jurisdiction from the federal courts over deportation cases?! There's SO MANY THINGS we COULD HAVE DONE." "THEY DIDN'T EVEN ATTEMPT IT." "They say, 'oh, if only we needed 50 votes we would've done it!' YOU DON'T HAVE 50 VOTES. You NEVER SHOWED you'd do conservative things, even with 50 votes! [RE: filibuster]...I NEVER saw an indication that they'd do it." "This midterm was a rebuke of the president and Congress...BUT, a LOT of our voters stayed home because they were FRUSTRATED with the LACK of productivity from Republicans in the House and Senate." We definitely deserved better from our Senate, something John Thune did not want to deliver. Now, we need to repair and win in 2028, or Democrats are destroying America!
785
2,789
222
24,405
823,168
Omdat ik met een vriend een keer mee wilde airsoften (volwassen mannen die elkaar met plastic balletjes beschieten) moest ik een VOG aanvragen. Vandaag kwam het antwoord:
521
251
52
2,056
226,415
Jasper de Groot retweeted
Bizar
Holy sh*t. Claude Code just found a hidden chip inside my Chinese power bank from Guangzhou. Every time I charged my iPhone, it quietly copied the whole phone… It also read our saved Wi-Fi password off my iPhone, got onto our home network and sent everything to a server. I bought it for $19 at an airport kiosk there 3 weeks ago. No brand, 30,000 mAh on the label, and it felt heavy. The first time I plugged in, the screen asked "Trust This Computer?". I tapped Trust without thinking and went on with my day. That one tap gave it access to everything. This morning I finally set up Claude Code to warn me when any device starts reading my files. An hour later, 10 seconds into charging, the screen filled with yellow warnings, then red ones: data was moving when it should only be charging. I asked Claude Code what was going on. My phone saw the power bank as a small computer with 64 GB of storage and its own internet connection. A USB cable has wires for power and wires for data, and a normal charger only uses the power ones. This one used both, and it had already copied all of this: → /device → IMEI and serial number → /contacts → 1,206 numbers → /apps → every app I have, including my 2 bank apps → /photos → 3,912 pictures, my passport among them → /wifi → our network name and its key → /wife's iPhone → her photos too, she charged from it twice and tapped Trust too Each time we plugged in, it used that key to get online and send out the new files: sends to → 47.***.***.12 uploads → 19 in 3 weeks last one → last night at 2:14, while we slept I pulled the cable right away. Then Claude Code blocked that address on our router and walked me through changing the Wi-Fi password and the logins for my bank apps. I had it opened at a repair shop, and what was inside is in the first comment. A 30-second check for your own is in the second one. Save this and test every power bank in your house today.
17
5
1
49
26,579
Jasper de Groot retweeted
Veilige gok: @MatsAkkerman heeft geen ervaring met (of kaas gegeten van) box2/box3. Deze discussie draait niet om een paar euro of benzine-accijns. Overigens een breder probleem bij politiek journalisten die geen ervaring als ondernemer hebben.
5
7
1
45
8,946
Jasper de Groot retweeted
Btw the loss of the Senate means the loss of the Supreme Court when Alito, Thomas, and Roberts are out, all likely in the next six years. Can anyone argue that the alliance with Israel is worth this much?
34
65
1
900
7,508
Jasper de Groot retweeted
Those against De Santis were saying that he just wasn’t cut out for the job. The results say otherwise. They said that the ‘vibes’ were not in his favour. This tells you all you need to know about vibes. They aren’t everything. Vibes without substance are pure propaganda.
Posting a longer cut of Ron DeSantis dropping some truth bombs about the state of the Republican Party after last night's blue tsunami. Hard to argue with any of this to be honest.
29
15
1
266
5,825
Jasper de Groot retweeted
Iran has cost the Republicans far more than anyone expected. It was a catastrophic mistake. And if Reform or the Tories were in charge, we would have gone to war right behind them. On day one, Restore Britain said no. It was not right for the British people, and we were absolutely right to draw that line in the sand. The consequences of ANOTHER pointless Middle Eastern war have reached far into the homes of ordinary British families. The price of petrol. The cost of heating. The weekly food shop. The mortgage. The small business struggling to pay its electricity bill. YOUR life has been made so much more expensive by THEIR war. Every pointless escalation has made life more expensive for people who are already being squeezed from every direction. For what? To what end? What has this war achieved? Absolutely nothing of worth. Restore Britain said no. Not because we support the Iranian regime. Obviously that is not the case. But because the first duty of a British government is to protect Britain and its people. And that very much includes protecting British families from the economic consequences of wars that are evidently and clearly not in our national interest. When oil prices rise, families pay more to fill their cars. Those moving goods face higher diesel costs. Farmers pay more to operate their machinery. Businesses face rising transport and production bills. Those costs do not stay at the petrol pump. That gets passed on. EVERYTHING gets more expensive. It is always the same people who end up paying. It’s not the politicians making grand speeches about international leadership. It’s not the commentators demanding military action from the comfort of television studios. It is British mums and dads trying to stretch the wage for a few extra days. It’s the pensioner frightened to put the heating on. The young couple wondering whether they can afford a home. The small business owner calculating whether another increase in costs will finally force them to close. They have been handed another bill for someone else’s war - a war backed by everyone on the right apart from Restore Britain. Farage said this is the ‘right one’, and 'the gloves need to come off’. That is VERY easy to say from a GB News studio. A Restore Britain government will put the interests of its own citizens before the approval of foreign leaders. Britain does not need another foreign war. We tried that. It failed, over and over. The abuse I received from Reform politicians for saying so was extreme. They were wrong. The Tories were wrong. Restore Britain was right. We need cheaper energy, affordable food, secure borders. We need to control inflation. We need to make our economy deliver for working men and women. THAT is our aim. Not getting dragged into another pointless foreign war. Our loyalty is to the British people. Our responsibility is to British families. Our aim is to make life affordable again for our people. And our answer to yet another unnecessary war was no, and remains no. No more pointless foreign wars.
1,272
2,235
222
24,148
1,074,062
Jasper de Groot retweeted
Als VVD écht niét over links wil, moeten ze de blokkade jegens PVV en FVD opheffen. Anders zijn ze definitief een karikatuur en onbetrouwbaar. #VVD #Belastingplan2027 #debat #jetten
3
8
70
2,408
Jasper de Groot retweeted
Europa was een compleet andere wereld voor de eerste wereldoorlog. In Groot-Brittannië merkten de inwoners nauwelijks iets van het bestaan van de Britse staat afgezien van de postbode en de lokale politieagent.
A whole different world used to exist, as AJP Taylor wrote about in his Oxford History of England: "Until August 1914 a sensible, law-abiding Englishman could pass through life and hardly notice the existence of the state beyond the post office and the policeman…He could travel abroad or leave his country forever without a passport or any sort of official permission. He could exchange his money without restriction or limit. He could buy goods from any country in the world on the same terms as he bought goods at home. For that matter a foreigner could spend his life in the country without permit and without informing the police…All this was changed by the impact of the Great War…The state established a hold over its citizens which though relaxed in peace time, was never to be removed and which the Second World War was again to increase. The history of the English people and the English State merged for the first time." If you want to learn about what the world was like in that era, if you want to know what sort of world used to exist, 1913 by Charles Emmerson is by far my favorite
1
1
135
Jasper de Groot retweeted
Het idee dat mensen voor het bestaan van de verzorgingsstaat elkaar maar dood lieten gaan, is pure onzin. Met de opkomst van de verzorgingsstaat monopoliseerde de staat alle vrijwillige samenwerking en verzorging die mensen met elkaar opgebouwd hadden. 👇🏻
Before the welfare state existed, working-class Americans built their own safety nets, and those nets caught people. Fraternal mutual aid societies like the Odd Fellows, the Sons of Italy, and hundreds of smaller ethnic lodges ran insurance programs throughout the 19th and early 20th centuries. By 1920, roughly one in three adult American males belonged to one. Members paid modest dues, typically $1 to $2 monthly in 1900 dollars, and received sickness benefits, death payments, and access to lodge doctors who charged $1 to $2 per year per family. The Foresters of America covered 900,000 members by 1908. These institutions ran on mutual contracts between people who knew each other; it wasn't charity. Accountability created alignment of incentives. Lodge members had every incentive to verify that sick claims were genuine, because fraudulent payouts drained their own pool. Government bureaucrats face no such incentive. Someone else bears the cost of fraud in their system. The lodge doctor system collapsed because the American Medical Association lobbied state legislatures throughout the 1910s and 1920s to ban contract medicine. Doctors working for lodges earned less than AMA members preferred. The state obliged, eliminated the competition, and left citizens with the fee-for-service monopoly that still strips your paycheck today. Voluntary cooperation built welfare that worked. Politicians dismantled it.
3
4
22
858
Jasper de Groot retweeted
Geef *nooit* op! Reconquista 2.0
Remember your history. Never stop fighting.
5
6
38
699
Expect to see these two using data to support their idea that Republicans who voted didn't care about the Iran war - well yes.... Republicans 'who voted' didn't much.
Mark Levin and Ben Shapiro agree that Americans don't care about the Iran War and it won't have any effect on the midterms. 🤡
13
20
281
6,105
Jasper de Groot retweeted
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up. So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us." Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true. But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone. Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were: 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.) In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you. The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there. I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
69,063
30,757
21,144
284,686
72,230,399
Jasper de Groot retweeted
Het feit dat deze 'activist' slechts een maand in de gevangenis hoeft te zitten nadat hij mensen met een plank op het hoofd heeft geslagen, in plaats van dat hij wordt uitgezet, zegt alles wat je moet weten over de problemen waar we voor staan. nieuwrechts.nl/114114-pro-pa…
15
91
8
350
11,964
Jasper de Groot retweeted
"We cannot say that all religions lead to God. That contradicts Christ." Cardinal Robert Sarah
112
1,185
49
16,860
291,693
Jasper de Groot retweeted
Republicans cannot regain the Senate before 2032. I have no clue how Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito are going to hold on until then.
209
503
70
11,311
492,308