Meese

What the Actual??? WA STATE CORRUPTION WARNING TLDR Who do you think seems more corrupt? 1) The public unions trying to buy Washington's Supreme Court races? Or 2) The PDC, which suddenly changed the rules 12 days before the election so those unions can spend even more? What happened: Oct 13: the 21-day late-money cap kicked in. Max $7,500 per donor to PACs. Oct 22: the PDC suspended it. By "interpretive statement." No lawsuit. No ruling. What it means: In this final stretch, when voters are filling out ballots, the PDC changed the donation rules so there's no limit on what one donor can give a PAC. Checks of any size, right up to Election Day. Who benefits: The unions. SEIU, WEA and WFSE have already given $450K directly to the "Beware the Attack on Our Courts" PAC. In addition SEIU, WEA and WFSE are also the largest donors to New Direction PAC, which has donated an additional $298K to the supreme court judicial “Beware” PAC Until Oct 22, each of them could only give the court PAC up to $7,500 more before the election. Now they can give $500K. Or $5M. No Limits Where does their money come from? $165M+ a year flowing into SEIU, WEA and WFSE. Tax-exempt- taken from their members—each year. 5 Supreme Court seats on the ballot. A majority of the court. How much of the Supreme Court does $165M buy? The PDC just gave the public unions the green light to find out. Want judges not bankrolled by the public unions? Vote. Pos 1: Scott Edwards Pos 3: David Stevens Pos 4: Sean O'Donnell Pos 5: Dave Larson Pos 7: Todd Bloom

If you are trying to shove an income tax down the throats of voters but they have rejected it 10 times already what do you do? You force through an income tax that is blatantly unconstitutional. WA State constitution says a tax may not be over 1% and it must apply to everyone equally. Why? Your strategy is to send it to a hand picked/appointed Supreme Court where you believe the constitution can be changed with out a vote of the people. Then: 1) You use taxpayer money to make sure it cannot be repealed by referendum by inserting an emergency clause even though it doesn’t go into effect for 3 years 2) you force the voters to spend their own private money to get an initiative on the ballot 3) You push them into the initiative process because it is much more confusing language and a process where voters must vote yes in order to vote no (just to be clear vote yes!) 4) You pass a law that requires a statement on the ballot itself with no counter point allowed that makes the claim that the initiative would cut K-12 funding no matter where the money would go or when it would come in EVEN THOUGH no initiative can cut funding for K-12 by law 5) You vilify public citizens for getting involved while You hide behind the enormous tax free cash piles of the public unions who will gain the biggest benefit from the income tax — as they run false attack ads with unlimited funds 6) You lie to the public about the broad intent and design of the income tax to hit everyone not just those making over a million 7) You keep a secret from public employees that their once protected pensions have had that protection removed by the income tax..and you can’t or rather won’t explain why the protection was removed Yet with all that stacked on your side, if voters hear that the income tax is actually an income tax they still don’t like you.., Vote Yes I-645 to Repeal the Unconstitutional Income tax