just a random boy · i like numbers going up and small models @googledeepmind @stanford

california
Joined July 2025
why friend-shaped?
1
1
71
and then AI cures every cancer except lung cancer
BREAKING: Palantir, $PLTR, CTO has said that some AI researchers are taking up smoking because they expect AI to cure cancer
54
does anyone actually call Golden Gate Park "GGP"?
1
65
been dreaming about evals for 3 days straight now yesterday someone filed a bug
1
5
318
bay area side quest olympics: i'm doing a part-time masters on top of work. a friend's founder fiancé flies SF -> Boston every weekend for an MBA. ok compared to that i'm doing nothing
2
290
yeahyyy
Introducing Gemini 4 Argon – our new frontier model. It’s built for complex workflows across coding, enterprise knowledge work, and cybersecurity defense – rolling out today to a set of trusted testers through our Fairwind Program.
1
8
526
Not every day you run into your MIT high school summer camp friend randomly at Google DeepMind
1
3
243
ive been using this and never looked back aside from 3.8 flash which I prefer cuz it’s blazing fast
Google’s new Gemini 4 Argon equals GPT-6 Astra on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index at 60% of the Cost per Task with discounted prices. Google is now back to being one of the top three labs in intelligence achieved Gemini 4 Argon is @GoogleDeepMind’s first proprietary model above the Flash class in over 7 months. With high reasoning (the highest available), it scores 53 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, matching GPT-6 Astra (max, 53) and 1 point ahead of GPT-6.1 Sol (max, 52), with gains driven by lower hallucinations and stronger agentic capabilities. At its current 50% pricing discount and with cache discounts increased to 95%, Gemini 4 Argon costs $1.99 per Intelligence Index task, 60% of GPT-6 Astra (max), but 2.7x GPT-6.1 Sol (max). After the discount ends, this will rise to $3.98 (~1.2x GPT-6 Astra (max)). Gemini 4 Argon is currently being rolled out to selected users and is not publicly available. The 50% discount is an initial promotion. Google has not yet confirmed the promotion end date Key benchmarking results for Gemini 4 Argon with high reasoning: ➤ Google returns as one of the top three labs on intelligence: Gemini 4 Argon (high) scores 53 on the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index, matching GPT-6 Astra (max, 53) and 1 point ahead of GPT-6.1 Sol (max, 52). This is 23 points above Google’s previous non-Flash model, Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview (30) and 12 points ahead of Gemini 3.8 Flash (high) ➤ Launch discounts of 50% make Gemini 4 Argon competitive on Cost per Task: At current discounted pricing, Gemini 4 Argon (high) costs $1.99 per Intelligence Index task, 60% of GPT-6 Astra (max, $3.26) for a comparable level of intelligence. This cost efficiency is driven by lower token prices, rather than reduced token use, with Gemini 4 Argon averaging 62k output tokens per task, compared with 27k for GPT-6 Astra (max). Google has not yet confirmed the promotion end date, but on standard pricing, Cost per Task will increase to $3.98 ➤ Stronger agentic performance: Historically a weaker area for Gemini models, Gemini 4 Argon shows improvements across agentic evaluations. It ranks #1 on AutomationBench-AA at 77.5%, 6 points ahead of Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max, 71.3%). On Terminal Bench 4, Gemini 4 Argon achieves 57%, a +53 point improvement from Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, only behind Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max, 64%), Claude Opus 5.5 (max, 60%) and GPT-6 Astra (59%). On AA-Briefcase, it reaches 1494 Elo. This is driven by a 65% rubric pass rate, the highest we have recorded, but lower Analytical Quality (1576 Elo) and Presentation Quality (1308 Elo) ➤ Lowest hallucination rate among leading models: On AA-Omniscience, Gemini 4 Argon has a 15% hallucination rate, the lowest of any model scoring 45+ on the Intelligence Index, compared with 51% for GPT-6 Astra (max) and 54% for GPT-6.1 Sol (max). This means Argon is much more likely to acknowledge when it does not know an answer rather than guess incorrectly. On accuracy, Gemini 4 Argon scores 50%, a 5 point decrease from Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview, and 13 points below GPT-6 Astra (max, 63%). With this slightly lower accuracy, its overall AA-Omniscience score of 42 remains in line with GPT-6 Astra (43) and GPT-6.1 Sol (42) Key model details: ➤ Context Window: 1M tokens ➤ Multimodality: Text, image, video, and speech input, with text output ➤ Pricing: $4/$20 per 1M input/output tokens at standard pricing, currently discounted 50% to $2/$10. Cached input tokens receive a 95% discount ($0.10 per 1M at discounted pricing), up from 90% on Gemini 3.8 Flash ➤ Long Decode Continuation: We tested Gemini 4 Argon with Long Decode Continuation, a new Gemini API feature that pauses long responses and resumes them across follow-up calls. This lets reasoning run up to 1M output tokens without request timeouts
2
205
got my first "please quit your job" email from a stranger today. yay thanks
4
252
i absolutely despise pedantic LLMs wasting my **output tokens** preaching how they won't complete a task this should not count against my token quota. prompt non-compliance is a model issue, and shouldn't be charged to the user
3
314
agents thinking and trying things so hard is actually quite adorable
5
381
I need to boast that I was on a call with Steven Pinker today
3
242
the loops loop back! thanks Tal, was a fun one :)
Nice summary by @rasbt! In Mixture of Recursions the model can decide how many loops to apply per token. And was really nice working with @raymin0223 @yujin301300 @reza_byt @kim_sungnyun @jenhriver @TalSchuster @adamjfisch @harhrayr Ziwei Ji @AaronCourville Se-Young Yun
2
321
🚀🚀🚀
Gemini 3.8 Flash Lez go :)
2
210
Gemini! 🥳
Introducing Gemini 3.8 Flash, another jump in Gemini's agentic + coding capabilities, and our 3rd updated Flash model in only 6 weeks... This model has been a ton of fun to work with, excited to see what you all think!
1
106
Nice to see recurrent transformers getting attention! Enjoyed working on the Mixture-of-Recursions paper (NeurIPS 2025) with @raymin0223 :)
Nice to see this idea getting attention! This is essentially what we called "depth-wise batching": overlapping requests at different recurrent depths (much higher utilization with adaptive compute). Recursive Models: arxiv.org/abs/2410.20672 MoR: arxiv.org/abs/2507.10524
1
2
518
why is there no AoPS for adults those were the peak internet days
1
149
i hate it when people say "it's intuition." intuition my ass. give me your SKILL.md
4
291
what are people even using to burn 10B tokens a week tell me what you're using it for
1
273
relearning chinese cuz people keep sending juicy tech reports i can't read
2
329