Jerry (@jerrylin75) header
Jerry (@jerrylin75) profile picture

#MAGA #Trump2024 🇺🇸 🦅 ⚔️

Bellevue, WA
Joined February 2017
Photo by Jerry (@jerrylin75)Photo by Jerry (@jerrylin75)Photo by Jerry (@jerrylin75)Photo by Jerry (@jerrylin75)Photo by Jerry (@jerrylin75)Photo by Jerry (@jerrylin75)Photo by Jerry (@jerrylin75)Photo by Jerry (@jerrylin75)Photo by Jerry (@jerrylin75)Photo by Jerry (@jerrylin75)
Unyielding Fighter, Donald Trump, never give in and never give up. Engraved in my memory, unforgettable four years …
17
1,510
I make every decision based on what’s best for my children and our family. With @StephenM taking on this new role for President Trump, I’ve decided to stop recording new podcast episodes. Nothing is more important than raising our four kids. While I’ve loved the podcast, the time commitment is too great and now is the time to step away. I’ll be cheering President Trump and his team on from outside the administration. I will be airing the two previously taped episodes.
3,110
2,522
271
32,108
1,300,392
The Art of the Comeback.
3,675
5,407
426
28,120
604,758
SENATE GOP LEADERSHIP ELECTION POLL - Name one thing Senator John Thune has done to earn the minority leadership or disqualifies him. QUESTION: Should the Senate GOP leadership elections be postponed?
78%Yes, postpone vote
22%No, vote next week
13,091 votes • Final results
426
490
17
1,032
217,064
Jerry retweeted
An “unprecedented” problem requires an “unprecedented” solution. The people who still think “states” control elections are about to get Rekt. The states just proved “nationwide,” that they are NOT enforcing federal election laws. That removes their jurisdiction and places it in the hands of the Executive Branch. Our entire election system is unconstitutional. It’s ALSO a “national security” threat. Can you see the setup? A declared national emergency and Constitutional crisis. The only REMEDY is EVERY “safeguard” that Trump has been preaching for ten years. No long drawn out legislative fights, state by state. One sweeping EO that permanently secures our elections and is then codified into federal law by the coming MAGA super majority AFTER a “new” election. Clean and swift!
Still trying to wrap my mind around how badly the left is going to take the news when they're lawfully informed that the Democrats rigged the election and some TBD remedy will have to be undertaken to fix it. Probably not well. 😁
67
564
19
1,719
28,515
Jerry retweeted
Remember what I was telling you right before the election. Trump ALREADY knew exactly how they would cheat. It was definitely algorithms in the machines but they ALSO needed a massive INCREASE in voter registrations. The DOJ lawsuit in California EXPOSED how the democrats were going to cheat. A massive INCREASE in voter registrations that did not “require” proof of citizenship. Trump purposely started a court fight over 20,000 “noncitizens” voting in California, knowing that the number of “noncitizens” voting is much larger in California and across the country. Trump knew the courts likely wouldn’t do anything to “stop” it BEFORE the election. Most people took that as a loss in the courts, but it was a huge victory. That decision was exactly what Trump wanted. The democrats needed to “commit” the crime and the most important part of that lawsuit, was the Ninth Circuit slapping down the lower court, which was trying to prevent prosecution of election officials for breaking federal law. The Ninth Circuit cleared the judicial branch out of the way because it is the Executive Branch’s Constitutional authority to “prosecute” federal crimes. Courts can’t prevent the Executive Branch from enforcing federal laws. That lawsuit set the table, to expose and overturn the ENTIRE election nationwide. The democrats didn’t massively increase their voter registrations with illegals, they did it with “noncitizens” who are in the country “legally.” Either visa, green card or temporary status immigrants. That’s a huge number and they showed up for democrats because Trump is ALREADY in the process of deporting most of them. But guess what? It’s illegal for ALL “noncitizens” to vote in federal elections. And Trump ALREADY has the full federal database of “noncitizens” with legal standing to compare to the voter registration totals and ballots. Checkmate!
The 2022-2024 43 state updated number of "New Registered Voters" registered WITHOUT proof of U.S. citizenship raises from 20,283,937... To a STAGGERING 24,662,998 new registered voters registered without proof of U.S. citizenship. Democrats coincidentally gained over 20 MILLION new voters within the same time period, while Republicans gained over a million new voters. This tells you everything you need to know.
133
1,166
44
3,594
88,295
Stephen has contributed far more to America at 41 than Abdul El-Sayed will in a lifetime.
El-Sayed on Trump and Stephen Miller: "He decides to hire the most broken man to continue to run the most dysfunctional White House we've seen. I don't know what Stephen Miller has actually contributed to our culture, our society, in any real way, except to make us more angry and stoke the worst kind of fear and vitriol."
5,817
2,386
346
22,389
1,351,829
To everyone asking who is behind this account: I am an independent citizen with financial and legal experience. I am not a career politician or a corporate pollster. When I noticed a strange consistency in the election data, I analyzed it and posted what I discovered. I have proudly supported President Trump since the day he came down the escalator. To know that a pattern I shared is of interest to him is a humbling and surreal honor.
163
705
15
3,772
77,606
Do you believe the 2026 Midterm elections in America were rigged? (Share for a larger sample size)
92%YES
8%NO
39,855 votes • Final results
690
6,632
199
6,768
198,320
🇺🇸
2,676
6,554
454
35,591
684,401
Four analyses are pointing at related pieces of the same large Democratic advantage in the 2026 midterms, and together they describe a strange Democratic lead that was already visible in the early vote. @TruthAnswersAll “15% Band” formula shows the final Senate and governor results fit a simple pattern: Republicans received about 85% of Trump’s 2024 share, while Democrats received Harris’s 2024 share plus 15% of Trump’s. The shift was roughly constant across red and blue states. @DataRepublican noted that a consistent ~15-point shift toward Democrats was already visible in the early vote once in-person early voting ramped up, and that the final results matched what the early numbers had been showing. I examined the early-vote registration data. Early ballots were up roughly 16 million from 2022. In states that report party registration, those ballots were about 42.6% Democrat and 31% Republican. A Democratic candidate advantage on the order of 14 million would require roughly 89% of the added early ballots to have gone Democratic — a concentration that does not line up with the reported registration split. @WallStreetApes compiled the EAVS report figures showing ~20.3 million new valid voter registrations between 2022 and 2024 in 37 states that do not require documentary proof of citizenship. That volume is large enough to matter for the absolute size of the Democratic edge. The numbers connect through scale and timing. The ~15-point shift measured in the finals and already visible in the early vote is the outcome. My ~89% figure is the concentration among new early ballots that should have been required to produce a margin of that size given the registration composition. Wall Street Apes supplies a large pool of new registrations that could contribute to the absolute number of additional ballots. Together, the analyses describe a large Democratic advantage that started early and was unusually uniform.
39
191
21
415
12,004
1,064
1,577
108
11,025
185,356
Thanks to President Trump and @SecWar Pete Hegseth, true American strength is back.
6,163
7,072
516
40,975
815,258
TEXAS: THE 15% GAP, COUNTY BY COUNTY The 15% gap held across the Senate map. Here’s Texas, all 254 counties. 97% of counties fell within range: 246 of the 254. Below the formula: Starr, Zapata, Maverick, Webb, Hidalgo, Cameron, Duval, Jim Hogg. Border counties along the Rio Grande. What the formula tells us: If a county is below the formula, the proportion of Democrats to Republicans who voted 🗳️ in that specific county was higher than in 2024. If it’s above the formula, the proportion of Republicans to Democrats was higher than in 2024. Why this matters: This isn’t a statewide average hiding the normal county-to-county variation underneath. The same 15% shows up in counties with dozens of voters and counties with more than a million. The few that break from it break in predictable directions. One rule works at the state level and the county level. That’s not what scattered voter decisions usually look like.
78
707
60
1,639
63,227
Trump just passed the mic to Stephen Miller at Mar-a-Lago and he delivered an exceptional speech: “I pledge to you, Mr. President, my absolute loyalty, my unwavering commitment and my total devotion to your success and the success of this country.”
59
378
34
3,025
90,262
KANSAS: THE 15% GAP, COUNTY BY COUNTY The 15% gap held across the Senate map. Here’s Kansas, all 105 counties. 94% of counties fell within range: 99 of the 105. Below the formula: Seward, Ford, Finney. Meatpacking counties in southwest Kansas. Above the formula: Wallace, Sheridan, Jewell. Three of the reddest ranch counties in the state, about 90% Trump. What the formula tells us: If a county is below the formula, the proportion of Democrats to Republicans who voted was higher than in 2024. If it’s above the formula, the proportion of Republicans to Democrats was higher than in 2024. Why this matters: This isn’t a statewide average hiding the normal county to county variation underneath. The same 15% shows up in counties with hundreds of voters and counties with hundreds of thousands of voters. The few that break from it break in predictable directions. One rule works at the state level and the county level. That’s not what scattered voter decisions usually look like.
59
685
46
1,507
30,393
A lot of people are frustrated that no one has been arrested over 2020 election fraud. Me too. But what if Trump deliberately waited until 2026 to first expose midterm election fraud and then the 2020 election because it’s actually much easier that way? This would be the first time he’d have a live election running under newly built detection tools (including SI/AI), mandated national audits, election monitors, full control of the House, Senate, DOJ, and special committees all at once, and another two years left in office—none of which he had when he tried to address the 2020 theft. At the end of 2020, Democrats controlled the House, which was crucial because they would have been the ones handling Trump’s 2020 election claims—and we all know how that would have gone. Any push for special committees, broad investigations, or hearings was going to get blocked, and that’s exactly what happened. They even refused to do any of the audits he wanted. There just weren’t the real-time detection systems in place that exist now. Flash forward: He spent the last two years building exactly those systems—military involvement looking at election interference, 1,000 monitors, plus AI and other tools to catch voter fraud in real time, mandated post-election audits—things that simply weren’t there in 2020. Now there’s an actual election happening under these new protection layers while he still has the presidency, the DOJ, a Republican House and Senate (the current Congress doesn’t switch until January 2027), every special committee that goes with that, and a favorable Supreme Court. And he’s not on a time limit like he was at the end of his term in 2020. He only had so many days to flip things then, but this time he is still president for another two years. That combination creates a window that didn’t exist with the 2020 election. The seats haven’t flipped yet just because the election is over; the current class of representatives still has to finish their terms. So right now he has the live election, the new detection apparatus, audits, and full institutional control all at the same time—all of which he did not have in 2020. Oh, and it gets better… The abnormalities and anomalies appearing in the 2026 midterms are massive. The Dems overplayed their hand in one final last-ditch effort to stop Trump because they know that once the war in Iran is over, their game is over. Trump will have full control of the board for the first time in their globalist 100-year history. That is why they had to throw the Hail Mary. But I digress. Maybe this is why no one has been arrested for 2020 yet. It would be far easier to make arrests in 2026 using the new systems and the levers of control he has right now. Once those cases are established under the current tools and majorities, it becomes much simpler to work backward and expose what happened in 2020. Waiting until this moment—when the systems are ready and the institutional pieces are still in place—is the point. This is all assuming the mousetrap theory is correct of course, and there is some weight to it.
In the 2026 midterms, roughly 94–99% of analyzed counties and congressional districts shifted left relative to their 2024 presidential margins, producing maps that turn almost entirely blue. No modern pre-Trump midterm shows a documented one-direction shift of that scale. The closest parallel is 2010, when 83% of House districts trended Republican compared with Obama’s 2008 margins (one analysis put the share losing Democratic vote share at 89%). That shift had clear, widely documented drivers: a weak recovery from the Great Recession with high unemployment, intense backlash against the Affordable Care Act and other Democratic legislation, a more conservative midterm electorate, and the rise of the Tea Party movement, which nationalized races and boosted conservative turnout. Even with those factors, substantial numbers of districts still moved the other way. The 2026 pattern is more uniform than any comparable historical midterm on record.​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​ What this means is that Democrats apparently voted at a rate that’s never been heard of in our entire election history, and it was even close. All because of, allegedly, the Iran war and gas prices—even though inflation was 4x higher under Biden, gas was twice as high, eggs were twice as high, and wars were popping up left and right. Russia invaded Ukraine. Palestine attacked Israel. China almost invaded Taiwan (but the deep state said, “Pump your brakes—let’s not get too crazy”). The world was literally on fire. Nobody is voting at historic levels to return to that nightmare. Nobody. Especially not anybody who voted for Trump in the past. Some may say, “Well, what about the shifts in 2018 and 2022?” Nope. That doesn’t count, because they probably cheated then too, to stop Trump exactly like they’re doing right now, and it worked back then (I’ll get to that in my next post). The 2022 shift to Republicans doesn’t count because that shift had to assume the 2020 election was not stolen and that the counties that flipped from blue to red from 2020 to 2022 weren’t actually red to begin with. Bottom line: NOT BUYING IT.
75
240
12
1,045
40,825
Testing the 15% - 2026 Senate Races The chart showed Republicans holding about 85% of Trump’s 2024 share across the Senate map. This sheet tests that pattern race by race. Method: Each projection is Trump’s 2024 share multiplied by 0.85, compared against the reported 2026 Republican share. A race counts as within range if it lands inside two standard deviations of the projection. Result: 29 of the 30 head-to-head races fall within range. The single outlier is Maine. The full table includes every state’s 2024 baseline, projection, reported result, and margin of difference.
39
286
28
721
21,755
There are rare moments when I’m at a loss for words, but the outpouring of support for @StephenM truly awes me. Stephen has stood by President Trump for 11 years through wins, investigations, rallies, foreign trips, state visits, and more. I’ve seen him work relentlessly around the clock to fulfill President Trump’s promises to American people. When we left office in 2021, Stephen always knew Trump would return and told the White House staff so on our last day in 45. No one (except @DanScavino) has worked harder or believes in this President more than Stephen. President Trump loves this story: Stephen and I met because of him when I worked on immigration at DHS. Without him, our four beautiful children wouldn’t exist. Anyone who has called Stephen in the morning or around dinner knows he is an incredibly active dad who pours his whole heart into them daily. Watching your best friend and spouse achieve their dreams is a once-in-a-lifetime experience. To the reporters prognosticating about the future and what his appointment means: Stephen loves our country and wants to make it better for our kids and yours. He means business and is ready to work. The best is yet to come. Thank you, President Trump.
5,780
9,260
406
68,229
1,875,021
HOLY SH*T 🚨 The post below goes over the Midterms election results and shows it was algorithmically rigged, I put it into artificial intelligence AND AI CONFIRMS IT’S CORRECT. THE FRAUD ALGO AND ELECTION RESULTS PERFECTLY MATCH “We cracked their cheating algorithm. 85/15 algorithm....for every 1000 Trump votes (most likely during early voting when Dems front loaded everything) 150 switched to Dems. It's the same pattern in every state that went blue” Check the AI screenshot. It confirms the math is correct to the results that came in
THE 15% BAND Look at this chart. 59 races. Senate and governor. States ordered from reddest to bluest in 2024. The solid lines are 2024. The dashed lines are 2026. The shaded bands are what moved. One formula fits all of it: Republican 2026 = 0.85 × Trump 2024 Democrat 2026 = Harris 2024 + 0.15 × Trump 2024 For every 1,000 Trump points, 850 stayed Republican. 150 landed on the Democratic side. The numbers: Senate: Republicans kept ~85% of Trump’s share Governor: ~86% Variation explained: 88% What makes it strange: It didn’t matter how red the state was. Wyoming, Ohio, Illinois, Massachusetts: same 15% (p = 0.69). The Democratic gain was sized by Trump’s vote, not Harris’s. The Harris part is zero. The 0.85 beat both standard election-swing models in every set of races. Drop any single state and the multiplier stays between 0.846 and 0.853. Why seats flipped: At 0.85, any state where Trump got under about 58.5% falls below 50%. Texas, Kansas, Iowa, Ohio, South Carolina, North Carolina: all under that line. All flipped. What this means: Midterms are messy. This one isn’t. Two sets of races, different candidates, different campaigns, and the same 15% decrease almost everywhere. A pattern this even demands answers at the ballot level: paper ballot hand counts, poll-book check-ins against votes counted, and voter files showing who actually turned out. The numbers raise the question. The ballots can answer it.
1,808
16,353
1,058
36,946
899,745