
@wildcatfi fine, we'll do it ourselves
Joined November 2021
- Tweets14.5K
- Following690
- Followers1.2K
- Likes64.7K
reminder, there are lots of compromised Ledgers out there still.
trezor server compromised
keystone server compromised
buy a lattice gridplus
Replying to @thememecoach @thdxr
yeah, from what I hear, forgejo is just gitea that is still receiving updates
Replying to @raagulanpathy
i am confused. this has to be engagement bait. and I'm already employed. and there are a dozen tricks to make this really easy.
are you just trying to get people to look at your profile? not understanding the angle here.
be careful of every popular thing that crosses your timeline.
the idea of REA is pretty solid but... you have an agent right there. write your own.
Proof REA is is malicious.
This repository is simultaneously:
(1) the vehicle for an active social engineering campaign harvesting credentials and biometric data from users who install it,
(2) the subject of apparent artificial star inflation to manufacture legitimacy, and
(3) the host of an architectural vulnerability enabling prompt-injection-to-RCE in AI agent workflows.
The combination of pre-positioned @latest install instructions and a coordinated amplification network represents a complete supply-chain attack delivery mechanism should a malicious package version be published.
can't wait to find out that our bodies are just quantum entangled puppets with some mind phenomena living on the other side of the universe
Chomsky was wrong.
Researchers found your brain doesn’t store language the way every textbook since 1957 claims.
For decades, the undisputed rule of linguistics, led by Noam Chomsky, was that human language is hierarchical.
We were told our brains process language using complex "grammar trees." That we secretly build deep, abstract, mathematical rules in our heads before we speak.
This new paper proves that is completely wrong.
Researchers at Cornell University analyzed how people actually process and produce language in real time.
They found sequences. Linear chunks.
When we speak, we aren't calculating deep syntactic rules. We are just predicting the next most logical sequence of words based on the context of the words right before it.
We string linear chunks together.
If this sounds familiar, it should.
This is exactly how Large Language Models like ChatGPT work.
For years, critics have dismissed AI as "just a next-token predictor." They said it isn't truly intelligent because it doesn't understand deep grammatical hierarchies like humans do.
But this paper suggests humans don't use those hierarchies either.
We are just predicting the next chunk.
Language isn't a rigid tree of mathematical rules. It's a linear stream of contextual predictions.
We thought we were building AI to mimic the complexity of the human brain.
It turns out, the human brain was just running a simpler algorithm all along.
it the @GrapheneOS phone!
hype
Elegantly crafted. Seamlessly contoured. Thoughtfully detailed. motorola signature 27 is designed to a higher standard.
#MotorolaSignature #SignatureStatement
this was certainly... a choice. and impressive work.
but uh... ram timing are rather precise, and they just destroyed those timings.
clever, but near impossible for this to work without getting incredibly lucky.
Replying to @bitbanter
what if we flip them the other way? do we only get good things out of them?
what the hell is this chart?
Terra 6.1 Max better than Astra 6 Max?
and still worse than Opus 5.5.
we better see Sol 6.2 and Astra 6.1 this week
Replying to @OpenAI
GPT-6.1 Terra substantially outperforms GPT-5.6 Terra on Agents’ Last Exam, a test of how well agents use software at work.
It even matches GPT-6 Astra at one-tenth the price per token and finishes tasks over 3× faster on average than both Astra and GPT-6.1 Sol.
Replying to @davidzmorris
oh, yeah, i agree the brain is nothing like a modern computer. but the fact is we don't know. maybe it's systemic with things we can't measure, and entropy built in? i'll allow for people to believe in a soul. but i'm not ruling out our own ignorance or inability to measure
Replying to @davidzmorris
i mean, we dont actually know, but I agree the forced bot propaganda is certainly tiresome












