Hazel retweeted
The @FA watched this tackle and saw nothing wrong with it. The Fleetwood player wasn’t punished, and the governing body meant to protect players just said, “Go ahead and make a career-ending tackle; we’re right behind you.”
Max Dowman could have suffered a bad, possibly career-ending injury.
Hazel retweeted
Wow
“This war never should have happened.” Professor Jeffrey Sachs in London on why NATO expansion caused the Ukraine war — and his 4-point plan to end it.
Watch the full interview 👇
youtu.be/94hvwwD2RGo
Hazel retweeted
888 Ich muss das jetzt einfach mal loswerden.
Weil ich es nicht mehr ertragen kann, wie wir alle für dumm verkauft werden.
Warum hat Putin die Ukraine angegriffen ?
Ich sag euch, warum ICH persönlich glaube, dass es passiert ist:
Wegen der aggressiven Osterweiterung der NATO.
Seit Jahren. Seit JAHRZEHNTEN rückt die NATO immer weiter an Russland heran.
Immer ein Stück mehr.
Immer ein gebrochenes Versprechen mehr.
Und wir sollen alle so tun, als wäre das völlig normal ?
Als hätte das keine Konsequenzen ?
Denkt doch mal an die Kuba-Krise 1962
Was erzählt man uns ?
Der böse Russe wollte Raketen auf Kuba stationieren, 90 Meilen vor Florida
Was man uns VERSCHWEIGT:
Die Amerikaner haben ZUERST angefangen
1961 haben die USA atomare Jupiter-Mittelstreckenraketen in der TÜRKEI stationiert
Direkt an der Grenze zur Sowjetunion
Moskau in 10 Minuten erreichbar
Erst DANN hat die Sowjetunion gesagt:
Wenn ihr eure Raketen vor unsere Tür stellt, stellen wir unsere vor eure - auf Kuba
Die Raketen auf Kuba waren eine ANTWORT
Und wie wurde die Krise gelöst ?
Mit einem Deal: Beide ziehen ihre Raketen zurück
Die USA aus der Türkei, die Sowjets aus Kuba
Die USA haben seit 1999 die NATO 7 Mal nach Osten erweitert.
Aegis-Raketen in Polen und Rumänien, die man in 2 Minuten von Abwehr auf Angriff umrüsten kann.
Und dann sollte auch noch die Ukraine dazu kommen.
NATO-Truppen, NATO-Raketen direkt an der 2000 km langen Grenze zu Russland.
Was glaubt ihr denn, wie Russland reagieren soll ?
So wie die USA 1962 reagiert haben
Das war für die Amerikaner damals eine existenzielle rote Linie - völlig zu Recht
Und für Russland ist die Ukraine heute genau diese rote Linie
Und dann sagen alle: "Aber die Staaten wollten doch freiwillig zur NATO"
Wirklich ?
Schaut euch Victoria Nuland an
30 Jahre US-Spitzendiplomatin, zuständig für Europa.
Sie selbst hat 2013 gesagt, die USA haben über 5 Milliarden Dollar in die "Demokratieförderung" der Ukraine gesteckt.
2014 wurde ihr Telefonat geleakt, wo sie "Fuck the EU" sagt und bespricht, wer nach dem Maidan-Putsch in die neue ukrainische Regierung kommt. "Jazenjuk ist der Mann" - und er wurde es
Das war kein freiwilliges Begehren, das war ein von Washington gekaufter Putsch
Klar, könnt ihr mich jetzt wieder als Kremlhure beleidigen.
Macht nur. Ich war mein halbes Leben Offizier.
Ich weiß, wovon ich rede, wenn es um Raketenreichweiten und rote Linien geht.
Und redet endlich über das MASSAKER IM DONBASS
Seit 2014
Seit 2014 werden im Donbass Russen massakriert.
Von der eigenen ukrainischen Armee und vom Asow-Bataillon
Über 14.000 Tote, die meisten davon Zivilisten, Frauen, Kinder, alte Menschen, die dort seit Generationen leben.
Luhansk, Donezk - 8 Jahre lang Artilleriebeschuss auf Wohngebiete, auf Schulen, auf Kindergärten.
Täglicher Terror. Wo war da euer Aufschrei ?
Wo war da eure Solidarität ?
Kein orf-Brennpunkt, keine Lichterkette, nichts
Die Menschen dort haben 2014 in einem Referendum gesagt, wir wollen nicht mehr zu Kiew gehören, und die Antwort war: Panzer und Bomben
Und dann wundert ihr euch, warum Putin sagt, er muss die russische Bevölkerung dort schützen ?
Was hättet ihr denn gemacht, wenn eure eigenen Leute 8 Jahre lang massakriert werden und keiner hinschaut ?
Und dann die wichtigste Frage:
WEM NÜTZT DIESER KRIEG EIGENTLICH ?
Schaut auf die FAKTEN:
Rheinmetall: Vor dem Krieg Aktie bei ca. 90 Euro.
Heute über 500 Euro
Rekordgewinne in Milliardenhöhe.
Und wer verdient daran ?
BlackRock
Einer der größten Anteilseigner bei Rheinmetall, über 5% direkt, gleichzeitig bei Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Northrop Grumman drin.
Friedrich Merz war jahrelang Aufsichtsratschef von BlackRock Deutschland. Zufall ?
Wir zahlen mit unseren Steuern die Waffen, Ukrainer und Russen zahlen mit ihrem Leben, und BlackRock, Rheinmetall und Leute wie Sigmar Gabriel schreiben Rekorddividenden.
Hazel retweeted
The Max Dowman dismissal:
1. It wasn't a red card. Referee made a mistake.
2. Dowman's 16 years old. He's only just taken his GCSEs. This is all part of a football education for a ridiculously talented player.
3. Criticism of Arteta for his reaction to Dowman is absurd.
Hazel retweeted
🚨ANDERSON NUKES URSULA
🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥
🚨"Hold Ursula Accountable" MEP Anderson Blasts WARMONGER CORRUPT EU Boss
🚨Europe is Under the YOKE of Brussels.
🚨For which, of course, you would then blame Trump, Putin, and Orbán.
🚨Professor Jeffrey Sachs: "Ursula von der Leyen will go DOWN in history as the one who DID MOST DAMAGE of any European leaders in history of Self Destruction."
🚨Extremely Corrupt, Arrogant, Queen Warmonger is Obsessed with Russia.
🚨You Routinely DELETE your Texts about
the Multi-Billion Payments to Pfizer.
Hazel retweeted
This is really poor by @FA. The governing body is supposed to protect players. It should be disputing this regulatory commission verdict by members drawn from the FA judicial panel. Max Dowman could have suffered a bad injury to his standing leg from a dangerous challenge which went unpunished. Arsenal 16-year-old shouldn’t have reacted but his frustration was understandable. Some other players might have rolled around and ensured a bad challenge was punished. Dowman didn’t. He doesn’t stay down. The FA should have shown some understanding towards Dowman. Instead, it has suspended him for three games. FA priorities all wrong: tolerating a poor challenge and some weak refereeing but punishing a kid who objected to a bad challenge that could have dealt him a serious injury. Protect players. #AFC
Hazel retweeted
I haven’t seen anyone mention him due to the enormity of the giant killing taking all the headlines but I thought the young Irish kid Ceadach O'Neill had a pretty decent debut for The Arsenal
Hazel retweeted
What sort of country gives loads of its people's money to other countries, then pleads poverty to its people and taxes them into oblivion?
This one 🇬🇧
Hazel retweeted
BRITISH VETERAN ERUPTS AT STATE OF UK 💥🇬🇧
"I'm 78 years old I've never seen so much hypocrisy in any government in my life"
"They won't stop the boats"
Hazel retweeted
Zelensky spent his entire career playing piano with his penis
When the lights are out he speaks Russian more fluently than Ukrainian. But for Russians, Ukrainians are also Russians and this is a civil war
Watch #MOATS Live on YouTube every Sunday & Wednesday 7PM London Time
Follow @moatstv 598 #Zelensky #Crimea #Ukraine #Russia #civilwar
Hazel retweeted
Dana White: "I Will NEVER Talk To A Doctor About My General Health Ever Again."
"Never again, none of them know what they're talking about. They're all full of sh*t. All they know is to put you on pills & put you on medicine. That's all they know."
In 1910, The Rockefeller Foundation, along with the Carnegie Foundation funded the Flexner Report.
The goal was to shift all medical schools & all teaching hospitals away from natural traditional root cause medicine & shift towards petroleum based medications & allopathic medicine for profit.
During this time, therapies such as homeopathy, herbal medicine, essential oils, chiropractic & naturopathy were commonplace.
The 1910 Flexner report concluded that these natural healing modalities were “unscientific quackery.”
This report also concluded that there were too many medical schools as well as too many doctors in America & called for the standardization of medical education.
Of course, this was with underlying intentions being that the American Medical Association would be the only entity that could approve medical school licensure in America.
Rockefeller worked with Andrew Carnegie to provide funding for medical schools across the country. This was with the condition, of course, that they only taught allopathic medicine & they were offered grants of significant proportions in order to adhere to these conditions.
Through these grants, primarily fueled by Rockefeller’s petroleum monopoly, helped to systematically remove any mention of plant-based natural treatments along with teachings on nutrition & diet from medical education curricula.
Supported by Rockefeller’s influence on the media of the time, homeopathic & natural medicines were quickly discredited & demonized through targeted media campaigns.
Hazel retweeted
Why do the press always call Tommy Robinson by his previous name or reference it, but don’t refer to Zack Polanski as Dave Paulden ?
Why is that ?
Hazel retweeted
The climate crisis agenda was built upon a predicted global warming scenario, now widely recognised as 'implausible'.
The Earth is not facing runaway warming.
First introduced in 2011 to guide policy, this extreme high-emissions projection - known as RCP8.5 (and later SSP5-8.5) - predicted a 5.5°C temperature rise by 2100. This misleading scenario was used to create subsequent dramatic news headlines for over a decade.
With the retirement of the extreme 5°C baseline ahead of the 7th Assessment Report (AR7), the ceiling for high-emissions projections has dropped significantly. The IPCC’s high-end baselines have been downgraded towards a 3.3°C ceiling - but even this appears to be implausible.
The flaws in this runaway warming scenario lies in the record of Earth's long climate history. The world exists within a long-term ice age regime that has spanned 34 million years. Current temperatures are actually 9°C 'colder' than the planet's 24°C average across the past 485 million years (Judd et al., Science 2024).
The current average temperature stands at approximately 15°C. This already low ceiling reflects a modest increase of up to 1.4°C over the past 250 years since the start of the Industrial Revolution. It also shows that increases in CO₂ do not automatically trigger runaway temperatures.
Earth’s climate system is amazingly complex, and is driven by multiple interacting variables. The principal driver of our current ice age cycle lies in orbital anomalies known as Milankovitch cycles, while global surface temperatures remain a composite of distinct regional dynamics.
Far from causing ecological collapse, the atmospheric CO₂ rise of just over 100 ppm has actually driven a substantial expansion of global leaf area across previously sparse terrain. Certain crop yields have surged, a phenomenon confirmed worldwide via NASA satellite vegetation data.
At roughly 420 parts per million, CO₂ remains a trace gas - still among the lowest concentrations in geological history. The atmosphere is more than 99.9% nitrogen, oxygen, and argon, while atmospheric water vapor exceeds CO₂ concentrations many times over.
A deceptive, anthropogenic CO₂-driven warming narrative had been heavily promoted by the United Nations and it's agencies, the World Meteorological Organization and the IPCC. This served as the foundational justification for Net Zero mandates.
In practice, it forced the premature dismantling of reliable hydrocarbon energy infrastructure across most Western nations. The downstream result has been widespread economic decline and a historic transfer of industrial capacity to Beijing.
China now produces roughly 90% of the world's wind turbines, solar panels and critical processing components. Many consider this to be the greatest transfer of wealth in world history.
However, it also suggests the world faces a vast and unpredictable geopolitical shakeup.



























