Andrew Jones (@lowredshift) profile picture
London, England
Joined June 2012
Photo by Andrew Jones (@lowredshift)Photo by Andrew Jones (@lowredshift)Photo by Andrew Jones (@lowredshift)Photo by Andrew Jones (@lowredshift)Photo by Andrew Jones (@lowredshift)Photo by Andrew Jones (@lowredshift)Photo by Andrew Jones (@lowredshift)Photo by Andrew Jones (@lowredshift)Photo by Andrew Jones (@lowredshift)Photo by Andrew Jones (@lowredshift)
Andrew Jones retweeted
The grid doesn’t have a technology problem. It has an adoption problem. Here are 8 technologies that are already piloted, proven, and deployable at scale today, with receipts. 🧵
“Who benefits if diesel prices are high and gasoline prices are high?”⁣ ⁣ @SenTinaSmith says it’s the president’s donors, and calls it corruption that takes money out of your pocket.⁣ ⁣ Diesel hit a record $6.53 a gallon in September. Gas is still above $4.⁣ ⁣ New Energy on the Ballot with @JigarShahDC and @dcjams. 🗽🔌
5
10
1
38
5,839
Today marks 20 years since Novaya Gazeta journalist Anna Politkovskaya was murdered in Moscow. She recognized Putin's true nature earlier than most—and the regime could never erase the truth she died to tell.
127
2,366
101
7,085
177,232
Ukraine’s normally copious grain exports are stuck in the country — caught between Russian attacks in the Black Sea, drought on the Danube and distrust among Kyiv’s closest allies. It’s bad news for global food prices. More in Forecast 👇 politico.eu/newsletter/forec…
2
13
11
11,084
Andrew Jones retweeted
Calling scaled venture capital "beta" is not an attempt to mock the strategy; a sufficiently large portfolio of startups does begin to look like levered Nasdaq-100. It's also not an exaggeration to say that large firms are structurally disadvantaged at recognising outliers. Large firms are systematically data-driven because of institutional memory, process knowledge, and training patterns — and data is inherently backwards-looking. So, they become better at recognising patterns at the expense of getting worse at recognising novelty. Smaller firms also have a greater risk appetite, because risk translates into alpha which is the basis for outperformance. Larger firms that serve beta are structurally attracted by marginal gains, and safer incremental opportunities. The future of scaled VC is to lean into algorithmic allocation and be the fastest-moving partner for growth. It's an elastic and theoretically low-fee product with reasonable returns for large LPs. The strength of small firms and solo GPs is specifically their ability to recognise potential that the market has overlooked. It's the ideal product for HNWs, FOs, FoFs, states and foundations with strategic goals. The divide between these two categories of venture investing will be dramatically widened by the impact of AI, as indicated by prior waves of technology. Related reads: "Venture Capital as Portfolios of Compound Options", by Sebastian Hillenbrand and Erik Stafford (2025) papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.… "Micro venture capital", by Mario Daniele Amore, Annamaria Conti and Valerio Pelucco (2023) papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.… "Bureaucracy as a Lens for Analyzing and Designing Algorithmic Systems" by Juho Pääkkönen, Matti Nelimarkka, Jesse Haapoja and Airi Lampinen (2020) dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/33138… "Data-Driven Investors", by Maxime Bonelli (2025) lbsresearch.london.edu/id/ep… "AI and the Nature of the Firm", by Alec Litowitz, Nicholas G. Polson, and Vadim Sokolov (2026) papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.…
Large firms exist because of market friction. If you want to be well known and easily trusted, size has traditionally been the answer. The downside of scale is greater coordination friction; larger firms become more inefficient. This is the basic economic principle laid out by Ronald Coase in his 1937 essay, The Nature of the Firm. For a long time, it remained unchanged. And then, in the 1990s, the IT revolution kicked it up a gear. As computers greatly reduced market frictions in some areas, the optimal firm size fell considerably. However, in other categories they reduced internal coordination frictions, enabling much larger firms. Essentially, it was an economy-wide barbell effect, as firm scale became more concentrated at either end of the distribution, with fewer medium-sized firms. It is likely that AI takes this even further, pushing firms much further out on the distribution. This is especially true for venture capital, where the market is already divisible into: - A scaled service-oriented industry with an elastic product (private market beta / solving puzzles) - A performance-driven cottage industry with an inelastic product (venture alpha / solving mysteries) In the former, the scaled firms will get larger in AUM and headcount as AI reduces coordination friction by handling more of the investment process. In the latter, the ideal size of a firm will fall to one, as AI eliminates external market friction by quantifying reality and making that more accessible. A simple way to frame this: The best venture investors are individuals, not firms. Peter Thiel, Cyan Banister, Oren Zeev, Charlie Songhurst, Elad Gil, Chris Sacca... They might also have firms, but their success is their own. On the other hand, a sovereign wealth fund has no real interest allocating to individuals, because their priority is scale and (lower) risk, not performance. This is the role that firms like Andreessen Horowitz play. One category of LP wants banging DPI. The other wants name brand firms, stable IRR and a five-star investor relations team. This is where the market splits in two, and why AI will push participants further apart on the distribution as market frictions are reduced.
1
14
5
108
15,334
Andrew Jones retweeted
It's been interesting and puzzling to witness the problems with accuracy in UK economic statistics over the past few years. (See the links in the next tweet for more.) It seems that the Office for National Statistics, ONS, now struggles to effectively measure basic figures such as employment, trade, and inflation. This resulted in a quite scathing government report published last summer, where Robert Devereux, a former permanent secretary, concluded that "most of the well-publicised problems with core economic statistics are the consequence of ONS’s own performance." There's a lot of discussion about the travails facing the UK these days (including this big piece in The Atlantic a few weeks ago[1]), and the problems with the ONS feel like an unsettling microcosm of diffuse decline in broader institutional competence. Anyhow: at Stripe, we became curious about the UK's published entrepreneurship data. While we observe a boom in many parts of the world, official figures don't show a similar increase in the UK. In the latest Stripe Economics post, we dug into the data, and, as far as we can tell, the official figures are probably misleading. The good and the bad news (mostly good, I think!) is that the UK is almost certainly witnessing an unmeasured boom in entrepreneurship: stripeeconomics.com/p/is-the… UK-specific issues aside, I suspect that this measurement question is illustrative of forthcoming econometric challenges. Keeping the world's macro indicators up-to-date in response to the faster-than-usual changes wrought by AI will be both increasingly difficult and increasingly important in the coming years. [1] theatlantic.com/magazine/202…
97
177
59
1,130
429,319
Andrew Jones retweeted
This is not your usual “I just came back from China” report. @busbyj2 is a top US expert on critical minerals & clean tech. Tons of insight here: “China’s scale of manufacturing — and the vast supplier ecosystems this sustains — make China arguably the only country where a mobile phone maker can try to become an EV maker as well.” thewirechina.com/2026/07/12/…
6
114
6
466
49,953
The Tartan Army are a credit to Scotland. Here they are in full voice singing ‘Loch Lomond’ in Boston Stadium last night for the World Cup match between Scotland and Haiti. Absolutely glorious.
565
4,716
299
36,321
1,139,061
Battery storage is growing at record speed, with 2025 additions 40% higher than in 2024 From balancing grids to shifting solar power across the day, storage is emerging as a versatile tool for modern day power systems around the world The full analysis: iea.li/4x0ns3Z
9
70
13
147
22,032
Andrew Jones retweeted
"We've made ourselves irrelevent..." the now late Alex Younger on the effect of Brexit. We are living through a time when the smart people are away from public space. He was an exception.
31
225
7
874
28,040
Explore our World Energy Investment 2026 👇 Summary: iea.li/4dQqJdu Investment by sector: iea.li/4vgnCT7 Tracking energy investment: iea.li/4dUuPBn Regional dashboards: iea.li/4dU9tE1
1
10
17
2,673
Andrew Jones retweeted
"You need to make yourself a big target for luck, and the way to do that is to be curious. Try lots of things, meet lots of people, read lots of books, ask lots of questions." — Paul Graham, How to Do Great Work paulgraham.com/greatwork.htm…
74
627
70
3,526
167,086
My latest for Bloomberg: "We are about to see the Great Clean Energy Acceleration 2.0 – a discontinuity in energy markets as profound as the oil shocks of the 1970s, and one that could bring forward peak fossil fuel use and emissions to this side of 2030." about.bnef.com/insights/clea…
17
145
27
379
61,884
Andrew Jones retweeted
Ladies and gentlemen, it’s Friday.
97
636
69
5,981
1,094,741