Alien brain pilot
Joined July 2021
- Tweets4.6K
- Following1.1K
- Followers159
- Likes7.7K
Pinned Tweet
Hot take (but shouldn't be, duh)
There are a total of zero alt smart contract chains with adoption that allow you to read the balance of your wallet.
Best your wallet does is ask your datacentermaxx caregiver sir how many spendable good boy tokens do I have?
i have a big guy in need of help with the hack of Porto de Santos.
If you need work hmi, they'll fly you here.
13
Reminder that while a successful attack costs a fortune on eth
An attack on bitcoin only costs money if it fails.
If it succeeds the attacker pays 0 dollars.
In fact, bitcoin transfers rewards from the failed honest defenders to the dishonest successful attacker.
Which he can then use to acquire more weight and establish himself as a hard to remove censor.
2
48
some high level blockchain devs/leaders need to see on a daily basis and ask themselves why are they here
(talking the ones that are not here strictly and consciously just for money)
teapaw.org/lex_node/status/212007…
if you have the power to censor, you WILL eventually be strong-armed into censoring
no one is immune
you need to believe this in your bones, usually from bad experiences directly had or personally witnessed, to gain conviction in permissionless system design...
8
What is with people confidently disregarding what makes ethereum valuable in the first place, which is decentralization in favor of short termism?
People are trying to mildly solve obvious, known for a long time, problems like cheap SSTORE and people are against it?
Please just move to tempo, solana, tron or some unsustainable centralized db
8
Reminder for the pump the gas people on ethereum.
This is wha you are advocating for.
Not your keys, not your coins?
Apparently, it's now:
Your keys, our RPC. Your coins, our permission.
A scammer sends 0.0001 dust to your wallet without your consent.
You didn't approve anything. You didn't interact with the scammer. You simply received an unsolicited transaction on a public blockchain.
Then Phantom's compliance filter kicks in:
"Your address has interacted with a flagged malicious entity. Transactions disabled."
Wait. WHAT?
So a random scammer can poison my wallet address with dust, trigger your automated risk detection, and suddenly I can't use your wallet interface to move my own assets?
Welcome to self-custody, where you own the keys but apparently need corporate permission to use them.
The blockchain didn't freeze my account.
The centralized frontend did.
The irony is almost too good.
We built crypto to escape banks freezing our money, only to end up with fintech apps wearing a decentralization costume.
If a wallet can unilaterally disable your ability to transact because some random third party sent you dust, maybe it's time to rethink what "self-custody" actually means.
Not your keys, not your coins?
More like:
Your keys. Their rules. Their permission.
Peak Web3 UX. 🤡
7
memerotator retweeted
In light of the issues with 8037 and 8038, I realized I don't post my opinion publicly as much as maybe I should 😅 so personal retro:
tldr; I really don't like these EIPs. They only allow us to increase gas limit without solving the fundamental problem of ever an growing state.
If we know how to create alignment tests to discover if AIs are antisocial, why not use that know-how for tests applied to inmates?
That would allow shorter sentences for some and longer sentences for others?
At least that would be better than the current system?
6
Noooo no one from Ethereum can know and understand cryptography please he is just an alarmist oh wait <guy_i_respect> agrees? No pleeease wait <other_guy_i_respect> agrees with EF researcher? Noooo
Então o plano do regime era:
1. Regime ausenta porta-voz;
2. Ministra/aparelho no TSE proíbe participantes de dirigirem a palavra a máquina
3. Ministro/aparelho no STF abre backdoor pro Renan entrar;
=
"Debate" é exclusivamente opositores ao regime se atacando.
O sistema é foda. Demos sorte.
22
