Woke. Nah (@mudcase22) profile picture

Just donโ€™t.

Joined July 2022
Photo by Woke. Nah (@mudcase22)Photo by Woke. Nah (@mudcase22)Photo by Woke. Nah (@mudcase22)Photo by Woke. Nah (@mudcase22)Photo by Woke. Nah (@mudcase22)Photo by Woke. Nah (@mudcase22)
Woke. Nah retweeted
One of the less understood NC provisional ballots categories is "No Record of Registration" (NROR). This is when a prospective voter presents but the pollworker can't find the voter in the pollbook. This is usually because the voter is in fact NOT registered, and you can't register on election day. Of the 34,782 2026 provisionals, 46% are NROR. Of the 26,022 2022 provisionals, 50% were NROR, but 1,120 (9%) WERE counted, usually because the pollworker could not find the voter in the pollbook, but the name was actually there, OR there may have been an error in processing a timely registration OR still in a queue from DMV. See image below for party and race stats on 2026 and 2022 NROR. In 2022, a plurality were registered Republican, in 2026 they were more than 2 to 1 Democratic. An interesting factoid, for any NROR not counted, the provisional form is also a voter registration, so the person will be registered for future elections. If 9% of the 16,021 NROR for 2026 are counted, the remaining 14,000+ not counted will become registered voters! #ncpol
9
32
4
94
11,627
Woke. Nah retweeted
Completely hypothetical question: Suppose that someone today started a new religion that condoned pedophilia, viewed women as inferior, despised everyone who was not of their religion, hated dogs, desired to conquer every inch of the world, hated our culture, civilization, and heritage, was astoundingly illiberal, cut off the clitorises of five-year-old girls, along with 1,000,000 other pieces of evidence that were contrary to every one of your liberal values. Would you think it ok to ban it or should it be granted full freedom to take over our society?
530
2,818
156
12,976
240,514
So let me get this straight. We are uncovering massive fraud in healthcare, welfare, and government entitlement programs across Democrat-run states โ€” involving sums so astronomical, so staggering, they almost defy belief. Fraud on a scale that raises profound questions about government oversight and accountability. And yet we are supposed to accept, without question, that the very same systems and officials overseeing this colossal fraud are somehow conducting elections that are perfectly clean, fair, honest, and legitimate?
391
3,417
186
9,908
88,813
Woke. Nah retweeted
Replying to @VP
6
32
2
185
8,337
Woke. Nah retweeted
The same women who said Trump was going to take away their rights.... Just voted for an Islamist I present to you the mind of a liberal
392
6,445
88
43,149
214,916
Woke. Nah retweeted
After DOGE, Elon came to a conclusion most people missed. He tried to reform the state from the inside. He failed. And he said it plainly: the government can't fix its own deficit. Nobody in power actually wants to cut. The machine protects itself. So he drew the only logical conclusion. If the state can't be reformed, there are only two ways this ends. Either global bankruptcy. Debt keeps compounding, interest payments eat the budget, and the system collapses under its own weight. Or robots. AI and robotics grow the economy so fast that the debt becomes manageable, and abundance makes the old fights over scarcity irrelevant. Here's the part almost nobody sees. For two centuries, capitalism has had a marketing problem. Its gains are real but slow and invisible. 2% growth a year doesn't feel like anything. Your life gets better over 30 years and you never connect it to the system that did it. Meanwhile, the left's promises feel immediate and concrete: a check, a subsidy, a benefit. That's why the left wins on promises even when it can't deliver them. Capitalism produces the wealth, socialism takes the credit. Robots break that asymmetry. When productivity doubles in a few years instead of a few decades, people will see it. Things get cheaper, services get better, opportunities appear, in real time. For the first time in history, people will connect capitalism and their rising standard of living directly, almost instantly. The causal chain becomes visible. And that changes everything politically. So there are two scenarios. Scenario one: we stay in the current inertia. No breakthrough, or a breakthrough we regulate to death. The debt wins. Living standards stagnate, then fall. A frustrated electorate turns to whoever promises the most, and that pushes toward a hard collectivist left. But collectivism fails, as it always does. And when it fails, the most organized, most disciplined collectivist force left standing isn't the old left. It's radical Islamism. Bankruptcy, then communism, then something worse. Scenario two: robots win. Abundance arrives, and it arrives visibly. The link between free enterprise and prosperity becomes obvious to everyone. And this is the key point: it becomes obvious to everyone, including the minorities the left was counting on. Because their long-term incentive is the same as everyone else's. A kid in the suburbs gains infinitely more from a booming, abundant West than from a bankrupt state handing out promises it can't keep. Abundance is the most powerful integration machine ever built. That's the Western renaissance. The West doesn't need to win the culture war by arguing. It needs to win it by delivering. And for the first time, it has the technology to deliver fast enough for people to notice. The race isn't left vs right anymore. It's robots vs bankruptcy.
3,416
8,285
916
48,472
8,896,935
Replying to @elonmusk
Unfortunately, we had the worst Congress the past two years. Amazing how little they managed to do. Now, we have to sit back and watch for the crazy shit they'll bury in to every 9 million page bill the next two years.
9
7
108
11,296
Woke. Nah retweeted
President Trump was almost put in prison for "pressuring" Sec. of State Brad Raffensperger to investigate election fraud in his state. 5 years later, Georgia admits they ILLEGALLY certified 315,000 ballots during the 2020 election Biden "won" by 11,779 votes. Let that sink in...
810
12,465
237
36,294
375,094
Only taxpayers should be allowed to vote. Anyone on welfare benefits should forfeit their right to vote until they are off of government assistance.
877
1,751
203
19,017
509,622
Woke. Nah retweeted
Replying to @TheCaptainEli
You do understand that 1) legacy media hates Elon (cuz of X) 2) legacy auto hates Elon (cuz of Tesla) 3) legacy communication hates Elon (cuz of Starlink) 4) Democrats hate him (cuz of DOGE & USAID) ...the odds are not in his favor yet
22
78
2
865
51,918
Replying to @ewarren
No. Because of this.
1
6
118
Woke. Nah retweeted
Replying to @ewarren
This you ?
1
26
1
300
3,605
Woke. Nah retweeted
BREAKING: Justice Department announced it has identified at least 405 non-citizens in Washington state who have voted in multiple elections Because the state has refused to share voter rolls, the DOJ estimates that there are potentially thousands of people voting illegally in WA
120
516
32
2,433
30,681
Woke. Nah retweeted
We need to shrink government, cut spending, and audit the Fed.
2,639
1,684
278
22,799
1,041,716
Woke. Nah retweeted
The idea that we would be attacked and removed for speech some fans disagree with is a hallmark of authoritarianism, pure and simple. And it's growing in America. You don't have to be on our side of the girls' sports issue to see the danger. As a conservative in Seattle, I am surrounded every single day by signs and beliefs I disagree with. Never once have I considered hurting someone or trying to silence them. This is the kind of activity and ideology that will destroy our country if we don't resist it.
We are owed swift apologies. @AlliedUniversal @ThornsFC Peregrine Sports
288
1,510
45
6,119
58,744
Woke. Nah retweeted
Replying to @elonmusk
Elon you act like you have the money and intelligence to go after these peopleโ€ฆ.. oh wait you do!
1
1
59
329
1,923
104
58,511
869,152
Woke. Nah retweeted
โ€œMusk cited the political establishmentโ€™s lack of will as the main reason for the difficulty in reducing the fiscal deficit. He argued, โ€œNo one in the White House, Senate, House, or judiciary has the will to cut spending,โ€ and claimed that except for a few like Republican Senator Rand Paul, there are virtually no politicians willing to reduce government spending. chosun.com/english/industry-โ€ฆ
574
899
84
7,383
140,071