Part time NMR spectroscopist and quantum mechanic; full time curmudgeon and professional cynic. Heretical Globularist 🌍 All tweets are personal.

Oxford
Joined June 2011
Better times will return
15
12
3
169
Jonathan Jones 🦆 retweeted
‘The Church has increased its administrative staff by nearly 80 per cent in 20 years while the number of parish priests has almost halved..’ The administrators truly are plenteous, but the clergy are few; Pray ye therefore the Bishops will open their eyes. telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/10…
5
19
3
76
1,948
Jonathan Jones 🦆 retweeted
Somehow this advert has managed to produce a controversy combining The Dress with the Duck God/Rabbit God cartoon.
Disgusting insinuation in this campaign. Absolutely appalling @MayorofLondon @TfL @ACT
10
27
2
983
176,651
Jonathan Jones 🦆 retweeted
The Woman of the Day is the Anglo-Saxon noblewoman Godgifu of West Mercia, the only woman to remain a landholder in Britain after those robbing Normans swept in and stole everything that wasn’t nailed down (and quite a few things that were). Of course you’ve heard of her. You’ve heard of the Godiva Procession which was instituted in 1678 by Coventry Fair to commemorate the legendary ride by the Lady. Taking pity on the people of Coventry suffering grievously under her husband's oppressive taxation, she called his bluff that he would repeal the taxes if she would strip naked and ride through the streets of the town, clothed only in her long hair. She only agreed on the condition that everyone stayed indoors and shut their windows, but a tailor known ever afterwards as Peeping Tom disobeyed and was struck blind. Allegedly. It was all bunkum. Absolute bunkum. Lady Godiva’s real name was Godgifu. She married Leofric, Earl of Mercia, but both she and her husband were major philanthropists and among the most munificent of the Anglo-Saxon nobility until the Norman Conquest in 1066 (and those robbing Normans came along, etc). In Anglo-Saxon times, in laws dated around 1008 AD, women enjoyed full property rights, from peasant to nobility. They could own land, farms, houses. Upon marriage, a husband was legally required to give his wife a Morgengifu (Morning Gift): land, money, or goods, which remained her independent property that she could sell, give away, or manage as she chose. Women wrote their own wills and left property to whomever they chose including children, servants, or religious institutions, and they didn’t need their husband's permission. All that stopped after 1066. The new feudal system tied land ownership to military service, something women were barred from providing. Women became the chattels (property) of their husbands if they were married, or their fathers if they were not, a legal state known as coverture. Still, I’m sure the Normans thought they were being progressive and inclusive, two words I’ve come to loathe. But I digress. Godgifu survived the death of her husband and was mentioned in the Domesday Book, one of the few Anglo-Saxons and the only woman to remain a major landholder after the Conquest. Godgifu certainly would have ridden a horse but not in protest and certainly not minus her clothes. Still, the idea of it proved quite a crowd pleaser at Coventry Fair in 1678, even though the first fake Lady Godiva was actually a lad. Yes, I know. Some things just don’t change. In the intervening years, the myth was spiced up by the Puritans to prove a moral point but dampened down by other Protestants to make it fit for delicate ears. Never forget: the objectification of women is eternal, along with its fraternal twin, misogyny. The two generally go hand in hand. Despite several attempts to shut down the procession — in 1845, the Mayor got fed up with the crowds jostling to get a better view of her, expostulating, “It’s a disgrace”, and in 1854, the Bishop of Worcester protested against “a Birmingham whore being paraded through the streets as Lady Godiva” — it continued as a annual event until the 1960s. Godgifu’s date of birth is unknown but she died in her mid-fifties in 1067 after the Norman Conquest of 1066. The Domesday Book of 1086 notes that the lands formerly held by her had passed to others. Men of course. Chattels are property, and property cannot own property. Married women finally achieved independent taxation in their own right in 1990. Prior to that, their husbands were responsible for paying tax on their income unless she obtained his signature and consent to claim her own single person's allowance and pay tax on her own earnings. Her unearned income — such as investment or savings interest — still legally belonged to him. And of course, the "marital rape exemption" — the legal assumption that a wife could not withhold sexual consent from her husband under the marriage contract — was not formally abolished in English law until 1991. 935 years. It only took 935 years in this country to demolish the legal status and definition of Woman as Property, and despite the Supreme Court ruling, we still find ourselves having to dismantle the definition of Woman as a feeling — with political parties, Civil Service departments, with trade unions, charities, retailers, and with sporting bodies. I know many of us are tired of fighting the same old battles but keep going, sisters. “We woman suffragists have a great mission — the greatest mission the world has ever known. It is to free half the human race, and through that freedom to save the rest.” Emmeline Pankhurst, 17 October 1912.
15
85
6
237
2,585
Jonathan Jones 🦆 retweeted
China consumed more coal in the last four years (2022–2025) than the entire world consumed throughout the 19th century.
72
841
131
4,587
122,850
Jonathan Jones 🦆 retweeted
I don’t think three days’ worth of food is going to cut it, is it? 🤨
Replying to @trendsDecode
The circulating "big news" is FORTRESS America, launched by Sec. Hegseth on Sept 30. It requires major US bases to sustain essential operations independently for at least 90 days without civilian power, water, fuel or supplies. Plans cover microgrids, batteries, portable reactors and stockpiles against grid failure, cyber or supply risks in major conflict. Confirmed via Pentagon statements and docs reviewed by Fox.
1
19
Jonathan Jones 🦆 retweeted
That's what genocide looks like
This 260-year demographic timeline of Poland’s Jewish population reveals the devastating scale of the Holocaust. Source: buff.ly/MEHJWla
6
13
58
1,577
Jonathan Jones 🦆 retweeted
Not having an election until 2029 latest.
🚨 NEW: John Healey will announce pensioners will be protected from paying income tax in the Budget The state pension will rise by £489 to £13,036 with the tax-free allowance rising to match
5
10
161
9,545
Jonathan Jones 🦆 retweeted
These people live in bizarro world. Elon Musk is stupid. Sydney Sweeney is ugly. Biden is sharp. Men can get pregnant. It never ends.
Elon is a profoundly stupid man.
180
1,145
24
17,284
146,097
“The Irish say they are not Greece. The Portuguese say they are not Irish. The Spanish finance minister said last week that Spain is not Portugal.” unherd.com/2026/10/how-the-n…
1
36
Jonathan Jones 🦆 retweeted
The Left is still claiming Arday is a victim and has been newly exonerated. Well, I'm from the Left and I'd fail my students for this.
Some people pretend to believe that these 12 pages from Arday’s thesis don’t indicate plagiarism
1
109
Jonathan Jones 🦆 retweeted
'Otters' in ink by Jackie Morris, artist, author who lives and works in a small cottage by the sea in Wales #WomensArt #Monday
72
2
405
4,778
Jonathan Jones 🦆 retweeted
He told a 65% Leave town he'd respect Brexit, then got the job and started measuring up for Brussels. Every Brexit-backing seat should remember Makerfield.
154
1,083
27
3,443
23,500
Jonathan Jones 🦆 retweeted
People who take safeguarding seriously are often uncomfortable to be around.
1
14
3
255
3,949
Jonathan Jones 🦆 retweeted
My radio-tagged Monarch butterfly RHE_Theta, which had been last detected on Oct 21 at St. Joseph's Peninsula, Florida was detected today at Corpus Christi, Texas--2,517 km from its release point--apparently having flown 1,180 km overwater across the Gulf.
13
21
2
178
4,310
Jonathan Jones 🦆 retweeted
Heads up, @OpenAI and @AnthropicAI. Rumor reaches my ears that you're doing a stupid thing, and should stop before you damage yourselves. I hear you've now nerfed your models so that when people try to use them to clean the spamware and spyware out of their televisions, you block that. If you really want Chinese open-weight models and open-source projects like OpenWaldo to eat your lunch, crippling your models so that people paying expensive subscriptions can't use them for completely legitimate purposes is a great way to accomplish this. If, on the other hand, you'd rather have a volume business, maybe stupid arbitrary restrictions that look like they have the sole purpose of protecting corporate sleazeballs aren't such a good idea. A word to the wise should be sufficient.
104
396
35
4,595
129,247
Jonathan Jones 🦆 retweeted
Right now, monetizing requires a significant devotion of individual time, effort, and thought, which takes time away from content creation. It's a problem that each individual creator has to solve, rather than having a standard solution. The problem is standard, but the solution cannot be, because right now, social media websites, and their owners, insist on acting like feudal warlords, rather than merchants and traders in an industrialized and cooperative economy. If there is, for example, a website that allows me to have a STACK of SUBscribers, this is very convenient for allow my patrons to support me. But suppose this website has no way to attract those subscribers, because it lacks a social media attribute that allows discovery. Well, I could go on another social media website, and try to attract eyeballs, but heaven forbid I should even mention the website that allows a STACK of SUBscribers, much less link to it, or I'll be shadowbanned from the other sites for acknowledging that other websites exist. They all have a quasi-religious objection to eating anything less than ALL THERE IS. It's like every venture capitalist and investor suddenly forgot every economic lesson of the last thousand years when they tacked "on the internet" onto the end of a business plan. So now we have to have youtube guys trying to sell plushies of their dog or coffee mugs, or taking sponsorships from the Sonoran Deceit Institute, because heaven forbid the internet just settle on one standardized tip jar. There's a big difference between the terms "influencer" and "content creator". Influencers are the dudes who are obsessed with having "influence" over "followers", so they can sell that influence to anyone and everyone. They love monetization. Content creator is a generalized term for every type of artist and writer of opinions and maker of things you want to see on the internet. They choose to describe themselves that way because they're focused on what they want to make for you, not what they want to do with your attention once they have it. Frankly, monetization is my least favorite part of the process, and I wish I could leave it to someone else. But I can't, because this gig actually is a full time job and I have a mortgage and bills and stuff, and being an extremely minor niche internet celebrity does not directly and automatically translate into anything the power company cares about. It's not a terrible burden, of course, because every job, even a really cool job like "write stories and be interesting on the internet" is always gonna have less-fun parts of that job. But it just seems like a massive duplication of effort, because there are thousands of us, and we're all solving the same problem from scratch.
🫨 Do you think Devon is going to get tips?? My estimate is maybe .1% tip-to-like ratio on Quite Good posts? I find this concept VERY RELEVANT TO MY INTERESTS
7
7
223
6,681
Jonathan Jones 🦆 retweeted
they didn’t clear arday they cleared themselves
Clearing his name after he’s no longer here to see it. Rest in peace, Professor Jason Arday. You deserved your flowers while you were still, here. #writing #WritingCommmunity
4
10
1
120
2,083
Jonathan Jones 🦆 retweeted
It speaks volumes that Labour strategists in No.10 Downing Street are looking at this and concluding: "what the British people want is free movement and MORE immigration". They literally don't care what you think.
44
195
1
763
15,962
Jonathan Jones 🦆 retweeted
The BBC has agreed to pay £400,000 to an award-winning Jewish documentary-maker who alleged she was subjected to antisemitism and pushed out of the corporation after October 7. Lucie Kon, 57, spent 22 years at the BBC and worked on programmes including Panorama, Today, BBC Breakfast and Storyville. Films she commissioned or helped produce won an Oscar, Emmy and Bafta. Kon says her treatment changed dramatically after the Hamas attacks. She alleges colleagues described Zionists like her as “evil”, argued that Israel should be called terrorist if Hamas was, and told her to consider what had driven Hamas to carry out the massacre. When she proposed a documentary about October 7, Kon says she was told she was “too partial” to oversee it because she was Jewish. She subsequently filed a formal grievance, but a BBC investigation rejected her complaint. Kon says she was then kept away from work for months. During a restructuring, her position was made redundant and she failed to secure the similar role replacing it. She launched unfair-dismissal proceedings. The BBC has now agreed substantial compensation, reported as £400,000, without admitting liability or accepting that Kon suffered antisemitism. Kon says Jewish employees still at the corporation continue to face hostility and feel unable to identify openly as Jewish or Zionist.
320
1,549
119
6,666
140,119