Just here for the XRP, BTC, and Telcoin news, dude.
New Hampshire, USA
Joined January 2018
- Tweets10.9K
- Following935
- Followers821
- Likes72.6K
Walter StackinSats retweeted
A culture that steals from the young by monopolising their peak productive years through price gouging and egregious rent seeking, charging twice, thrice or even four times what they paid for essential services, is operating an inverted structure where the old siphon from the young by leeching off their vitality like a desiccating parasite, when they should be nurturing the next generation rather than sacrificing it. There is no greater sign of narcissism in a culture, be it western materialist short-term greed or eastern self-sacrificing parent worship where the child is viewed as a unit of consumption to better and improve the lot of elders, rather than something that those elders should be cultivating and sacrificing for. The young of today have every right to be mad. They would be mad not to be.
Walter StackinSats retweeted
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"—whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up.
So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us."
Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026.
There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasn’t sharp enough down the stretch. I’m sure that’s true.
But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone.
Another pollster—one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday we’d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were:
1) End the war
2) Focus on cost of living/inflation
3) Put America First
4) Change our relationship to Israel
Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (She’s also a great person.)
In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcement—by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you.
The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night.
If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.
But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there.
I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, “I told you so”: you’re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Let’s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
Why don't I belive that only 159 people have "liked" this post, made by someone with nearly 11M followers?
On 17 July 2026, Tristan and I were in Washington, D.C. having spent the preceding days meeting with more than 100 people within and connected to the U.S. political system. Our conversations focused on mobilizing young people ahead of the midterm elections and the influence of independent cultural figures over a generation traditional politicians have failed to reach.
That same day, whilst Labour announced Andy Burnham as its new leader, I flew to Miami to host a boxing event with Jon Jones. The next day, Tristan and I were arrested under provisional extradition warrants, before any substantive evidence had been presented to the US court.
I have now spent 109 days in solitary confinement.
I publicly supported Donald Trump in 2016, 2020 and 2024, playing what many people consider a meaningful role in the cultural shift behind his return to the White House. Even Kamala Harris has discussed my electoral influence in her autobiography. People like Charlie Kirk and I challenged political orthodoxy and reached young men whom the establishment had abandoned.
I was doing the same in Britain, challenging Labour over grooming gangs, mass immigration and freedom of speech, while supporting the movements around Reform UK and Restore.
Now consider the extraordinary coincidence: two brothers, different complainants, different allegations, different dates and separate investigations, yet extradition warrants issued simultaneously and both arrested together.
The political interference was obvious with MPs openly calling for action against us for our online speech. The coordination and timing are blatantly a politically motivated attempt to silence me ahead of the US midterms and during a critical period in British politics.
Tommy Robinson faces criminal proceedings. Nigel Farage and Reform UK face investigations and scrutiny. Meanwhile, I remain in solitary confinement. This is a perfect example of the treatment of political dissent under the Labour Party.
This is bigger than me. What happens when somebody challenges powerful institutions and accepts the risks of speaking freely, only to find that those who benefited from their courage are unwilling to defend their basic rights?
Last night's election results should prompt serious reflection about what happens when political parties lose the trust of their own supporters.
Every young person considering speaking publicly is watching. If controversy means abandonment, why should they believe that institutions promising freedom will defend their rights when it matters? I receive thousands of messages asking precisely that question.
I have spent 109 days fighting for my liberty due to political interference by a Labour government whose actions I have repeatedly challenged.
You cannot claim to defend freedom while treating the freedom of controversial people as expendable.
1
70
Walter StackinSats retweeted
Patrick Bet-David, Benny Johnson, Matt Walsh, Michael Knowles, Dan Bongino, Glenn Beck/Blaze Media, Sean Hannity, Jesse Watters/Fox News, Steven Crowder, Jack Posobiec, and many others did not use their large platforms to put enough pressure on the administration to avoid this war.
This INCLUDES even the “limited strikes” and hitting the nuclear sites during the 12-day war.
That was a major escalation that provided little strategic benefit (Iran preserved the highly enriched uranium before the strikes and can still rebuild the facilities) and only heightened tensions.
The "limited strikes" also increased Iran's resolve to potentially get a nuclear bomb and or force closure of the strait of Hormuz and Bab al-Mandab strait (~30% of the world's energy flows through those 2 paths).
This war has led to inflation and doubled the price of gas in America with Brent crude sitting at over $100 per barrell for months!
I actually like and respect a lot of the people on this list, but when it mattered, they avoided calling out the administration for this geopolitical disaster, and that directly led to the massacre we witnessed last night.
It’s only going to get worse from here unless we make some SERIOUS CHANGES before 2028.
Neoconservatism is officially dead.
Walter StackinSats retweeted
What's the difference between XRP and stablecoins like RLUSD?
RLUSD is optional. XRP isn't.
RLUSD is a dollar-backed token issued by Ripple. As the issuer, Ripple has to follow US law and can freeze RLUSD. XRP has no issuer and no jurisdiction, and nobody can freeze it. It's a commodity.
XRP also has a privileged role on the XRP Ledger. Every account can hold it by default, and everyone has to use it: accounts need an XRP reserve, and every transaction fee is paid in XRP. RLUSD you have to opt into it (TRUST-line).
On top of that, the DEX automatically checks whether bridging through XRP gives a better rate on a cross-currency swap (e.g. USD → EUR). No other asset gets that by default.
Another important difference: XRP is volatile. Like any commodity, it isn't backed by anything, so its price is whatever the market says it is. That volatility is exactly what attracts traders and investors. RLUSD is the opposite: 1 RLUSD = 1 USD.
Just from this we can already see that different use cases gravitate towards each asset.
Whenever you need stable value for payroll, invoices etc, don't hold a volatile asset like XRP. Price swings shouldn't decide whether you can fund your operations. Stablecoins for any national currency fit here, and RLUSD is one of many even among the dollar stablecoins.
Whenever you need a neutral asset that nobody controls, not even a government, and you want to reduce your counterparty risk, XRP is the only choice on the XRP Ledger. There is no alternative.
Turns out these properties also make XRP very attractive to market makers bridging pools of liquidity. They only have to worry about XRP's price, not whether the issuer of some token runs into trouble.
The more successful the XRP Ledger becomes, the more accepted XRP becomes and to make it successful we leverage our strengths and the things we are good at. This includes the activity of stablecoins and other assets.
Walter StackinSats retweeted
I’ve been red pilled, black pilled, white pilled, clear pilled. All the pills.
I don’t even know which one this is, but it’s one of the strongest ones I’ve had in a long long time. The desperation in his voice. You can see the sight of his kids in his eyes when he says he’s supposed to be home with them. You can see the math he’s doing in his head as he calculates how much money he has left, and how much he needs for his mortgage, and when it’s due.
What the hell is the American dream anymore? Is this what it’s about? Is there anyone who would say this guy isn’t working his ass off? For what? So that 25% of his income can go to a government that wastes it on a bunch of shit he didn’t vote for? Subsidizing the food he stocks grocery stores with for people who don’t work a 1,000th of how hard he works to buy groceries with EBT cards that he pays for, which then drives up the cost of groceries for him and his family that he pays for out of his paycheck because he’s doing it the right way.
This entire system is shit. It’s shit. There is no nicer way to put it. It is dog. shit.
This guy should be working a 9-5 at a job that gives him dignity so that he can be at home with his kids at a decent time. Instead he’s some jerk off’s content. His stressed out, end of his rope reaction is some asshole’s income.
This is bleak stuff. Absolutely bleak.
Walter StackinSats retweeted
Walter StackinSats retweeted
Want to have your mind blown?
In 1971, the median household income was $9,030, or 220 ounces of gold.
In 2025, it was $87,460, or just 25 ounces of gold.
Your paycheck went up 10x.
Measured in gold, it fell 88%.
To earn what the median household earned in 1971, you’d need about $890,000 per year today.
That’s what fiat debasement looks like.
Walter StackinSats retweeted
Ran possibly my most brutal dating app experiment yet:
Normal 5’9 guy vs. an extremely unattractive woman.
Results were here all tracked…
Guy: 12 likes, 3 matches, 0 date offers.
Woman: 1,206 likes, 342 matches, 28 date offers.
100x more likes. 114x more matches.
I knew it would be bad.
I did not think it would be THIS bad.
It’s cooked
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
These dating experiment results were posted by an account identified in a Daily Mail investigation as fabricating dating interactions and experiments. A former friend stated all such content is made-up. dailymail.com/lifestyle/arti…
Walter StackinSats retweeted
🚨New Hampshire congressional candidate and daughter of NH Senator Jeanne Shaheen gets caught in a lie during a debate over comments she made regarding ICE
Local businessman Anthony DeLorenzo is running for Congress against Shaheen and he isn’t pulling any punches 👊
Shaheen has also been criticized for her lack of transparency regarding payments received from Jeffrey Epstein associate Dean Kamen
#NHpolitics #GOP
Walter StackinSats retweeted
The best friend of Epstein, Morgan Mcsweeny worked directly with @Keir_Starmer to falsify prosecution against me for my right to free speech as an American citizen.