Countering the disinformation, racism, misogyny, and prejudices of the authoritarian 'Pro-Life' movement | Former 'pro-lifer' turned pro-truth | R word = ๐Ÿšซ

Joined May 2022
OBJECTIFICATION ERODES personhood, devalues consent, and justifies exploitation, engendering systemic biases in the enforcement or application of law and protections meant to secure the inviolability of body and will, person and personality. reprotruth.com/p/violabilityโ€ฆ
6
1
12
467
๐ซ๐ž๐๐ซ๐จ-๐“๐ซ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ก retweeted
Are you ? You don't seem to understand what constitutes an abortion yet you're making broad assumptions. Every time you post, you make it more obvious that you have no idea what you're talking about. Maybe just be quiet.
1
1
1
21
Anti-woman arguments in a nutshell: Embryos should be protected by the law, but not bound by it. Women should be bound by the law but not protected by it.
2
16
51
487
The real issue is who controls womenโ€™s bodies. Why any Catholic takes direction about maternal healthcare from ignorant clergy is bizarre.
These debates cost babies their lives because they distract from the real issue. The pre-born of being denied their 14th amendment constitutional rights while being mass murdered. We need to all unite around and focus on demanding the Supreme Court immediately recognized 14th amendment constitutional rights from the moment of conception. When this becomes reality, we can discuss or debate how to deal with the murderers. @jamesfishback
1
1
2
42
๐ซ๐ž๐๐ซ๐จ-๐“๐ซ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ก retweeted
Lawmakers who ban abortion but refuse to fund prenatal care, postpartum support, or school lunches, healthcare, or any other support after birth arenโ€™t pro-life. Theyโ€™re only pro-forced birth at best.
4
13
68
671
๐ซ๐ž๐๐ซ๐จ-๐“๐ซ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ก retweeted
Someone claiming to work in healthcare and uttering gnostic science talking points isnโ€™t ironic, itโ€™s just old fashioned incompetence
1
1
4
45
๐ซ๐ž๐๐ซ๐จ-๐“๐ซ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ก retweeted
No, not an argument It's what the OBGYN told a patience who needed a medically necessary abortion Because inducing termination of pregnancy by using medication to induce labor and delivery before viability is an abortion. Only people who pretend otherwise are anti-abortion
1
1
1
71
๐ซ๐ž๐๐ซ๐จ-๐“๐ซ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ก retweeted
Focus. You: "there are no circumstances where abortion is absolutely medically necessary" Inducing delivery before viability is an abortion When abortion is "absolutely medically necessary" you don't call it "abortion" then say abortion is never "absolutely medically necessary
A person who won't use the word "abortion" to describe a previable induced termination of intrauterine pregnancy, to save a pregnant patient's life, is just demonstrating that they prioritize politicized rhetoric and optics over access to lifesaving care.
1
1
1
4
100
๐ซ๐ž๐๐ซ๐จ-๐“๐ซ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ก retweeted
A person who won't use the word "abortion" to describe a previable induced termination of intrauterine pregnancy, to save a pregnant patient's life, is just demonstrating that they prioritize politicized rhetoric and optics over access to lifesaving care.
1
3
2
11
369
๐ซ๐ž๐๐ซ๐จ-๐“๐ซ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ก retweeted
False. 17 weeks GA, PPROM, Arkansas "The on-call obstetrician informed Ms. Waldorf...the hospitalโ€™s legal team...would not authorize induction of labor, as induction at that stage of pregnancy is an abortion" This is why abortion bans put people at risk. arktimes.com/wp-content/uploโ€ฆ
2
5
7
151
๐ซ๐ž๐๐ซ๐จ-๐“๐ซ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ก retweeted
You worked in healthcare so you should know better than to play games Inducing labor and delivery before viability is an abortion. Inducing termination of intrauterine pregnancy for any reason before viability is an abortion. This is false โฌ‡๏ธ
Replying to @BlueDash12 @drorfh
I have worked on health care policy for more than a decade. None of those conditions necessitate an abortion. In fact, abortion isnโ€™t the first-line treatment in the ACOG guidelines for *any* of these conditions. Preterm delivery is an option in every single one of them.
1
1
5
95
๐Ÿ‘‡
A person who won't use the word "abortion" to describe a previable induced termination of intrauterine pregnancy, to save a pregnant patient's life, is just demonstrating that they prioritize politicized rhetoric and optics over access to lifesaving care.
2
11
163
#CatholicChurch of course not. He thinks he knows womenโ€™s bodies more than women do. โ€œThere is something bizarre and unseemly about a group of celibate men who have such a preoccupation with controlling women's fertility.โ€ ~NCR
You canโ€™t convince me that contraception is good for women.
2
4
132
๐ซ๐ž๐๐ซ๐จ-๐“๐ซ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ก retweeted
Prominent Republican & former chief justice of the Texas Supreme Court, Thomas R. Phillips, has endorsed James Talarico over Ken Paxton. โ€œPaxtonโ€™s longstanding reputation will embarrass Texas in ways our state simply cannot afford." nytimes.com/live/2026/10/26/โ€ฆ
14
44
551
What an ignorant, raging misogynist.
Abortion is quite simple: Women, you donโ€™t have a right to murder your unborn child. If you commit murder, then youโ€™ll be prosecuted for murder. Men, if you get a woman pregnant, then you must provide for her. If you donโ€™t provide, then youโ€™ll be imprisoned and forced to work.
1
4
71
๐ซ๐ž๐๐ซ๐จ-๐“๐ซ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ก retweeted
3
14
3
39
523
๐ซ๐ž๐๐ซ๐จ-๐“๐ซ๐ฎ๐ญ๐ก retweeted
Remember, as you go to the polls, vote for the candidates who think: Women have the RIGHT to their own bodies Women have the RIGHT to make decisions about their own reproductive choices Women have the RIGHT to reproductive health Women have the RIGHT to reproductive justice
1
8
21
319
Likes controlling womenโ€™s bodies.
Get ready! 89 more days until @March_for_Life! That's less than 3 months away, folks!
1
3
29