I hope this war is Christ's triumph, Babylon's ruin.

The Throne over America
Joined September 2023
O Lord, thy judgments give the king, his son thy righteousness. With right he shall thy people judge, thy poor with uprightness. The lofty mountains shall bring forth unto the people peace; Likewise the little hills the same shall do by righteousness.
1
7
1,459
King Edward IX retweeted
as the woman derives her origin from the man, she is therefore inferior in rank. — John Calvin
5
4
1
101
1,837
Wrong domain, Eli. Probabilities lie between 0 and 1 in the real numbers, but can be either rational or irrational, as the reals are the union of rational and irrational numbers. Not sure what sin has to do with probabilities, either.
Replying to @JayCCalhoun
It’s sinful to claim that’s probable. You’re really upsetting me, Jay. I know you’re a proud racist, and I probably should have been more upset earlier, but you aren’t even being rational here.
1
6
258
I'm growing very tired of preaching which makes no use of the text besides as a springboard to repeat a bunch of otherwise orthodox (and sometimes subtly unorthodox) claims which has no relation to the text, nor any application to the heart of the hearers.
4
71
King Edward IX retweeted
Delightful to every one is his native soil, and it is also delightful to dwell among one’s own people. — John Calvin
7
22
1
151
1,394
Premise 1. Grace perfects nature. Premise 2. Specific love of one’s people and place is of nature. Therefore, grace perfects specific love of one’s people and place. That’s what is Christian about it. In other words, Christians—as renewed images of God—are all the more earnest to honor God in elements of the original creation that are good.
7
3
48
1,437
Dare I say, he will be a little slow to write about what's going on.
I am on the road, and just got set up at my next location. I see the darker side of social media (which is most of it) is alive with yammering about Sam Sey. I haven't said anything about it because I, like all the stinking rest of you, haven't a clue what is going on. I don't care who "has a friend who has a friend" and what they say. When Sam gets to speak for himself, then we can comment meaningfully, if we choose to do so. Till then, it is all a bunch of noise, and lots of folks on both sides have jumped to conclusions because they spoke without sufficient facts. That being said, the vile, disgusting behavior of the Christless Nationalists truly turns the stomach. These folks have completely sold out to the same spirit that motivated the Brown Shirts nearly a century ago now. And I have challenged a few to attempt to think rationally and substantiate their wild claims--and found them incapable of so doing. I comment on the grossly unbiblical attitudes displayed in one instance, and they respond, "So you want your country over-run by Muslims" or some other such absurd statement. No, I don't, but you morons yammering on social media while hiding behind anonymous accounts, or following Alex Jones sycophants, are doing a whole lot less about it than I am, that's for sure. It truly is an amazing thing to observe, and, yes, I do believe it is part of judgment upon the culture. So how about we all just learn to sit on our hands and patiently wait for actual, verifiable information to become available? Maybe give brother Sey a chance to speak for himself? Is there any reason why that is a problem? Or to put it another way, if you got caught up in something with the government, would YOU want people to go crazy with speculation before you had the opportunity to explain and defend yourself? Think about it.
1
69
King Edward IX retweeted
The nations are God's idea. He "made from one man every nation of mankind to live on all the face of the earth, having determined allotted periods and the boundaries of their dwelling place" (Acts 17:26). A civil servant who will not guard his own people's inheritance has failed his duty of office. And the denominational agencies that lived for decades on federal resettlement grants have no standing to lecture the rest of us about what the way of Jesus requires at the border.
14
82
3
471
6,940
King Edward IX retweeted
This is a friendly counter to a recent OPC article about why we have a ministerial shortage. I agree performative masculinity is a trap for young men; however, an effeminate ministry is still a pressing matter. Pastors should command attention, exercise responsibility, and stand faithful against all odds. The article starts out with a question: "We need to ask why fewer young men are being formed into men capable of embracing costly, durable, public, spiritual responsibility." Answering this question requires understanding how the feminist culture and ways have seeped into the lives of young men and the church: 📷Manhood is declared "toxic" by society 📷All-male spaces are almost gone 📷Mother's Day vs. Father's Day sermons 📷"Always-believe-women" is promoted... 📷Tone-policing Church is too often a safe space for broken women, and men are purely decorative (see The Feminization of American Culture). This is not only my observation of nearly 30 years as a church officer but of others as well. The claim that the ministry is "masculine" is partly correct. That it is only for men is clear enough in Scripture; unfortunately, "maleness" and "masculinity" are being redefined in real-time. Often, churches and leaders pick up on the Current Thing™ without conscious thought. Thus, they rework Scripture to fit such things, and sometimes in fanciful ways, such as the anti-patriarchy article that was withdrawn from the OPC officer journal. This is itself illustrative of being too soft, for the article was never publicly denounced, and even another OPC church officer has defended its publication. On the other hand, sermons about submission are being attacked, like in the case of Rick Appleton of the PCA. And a straight-forward passage on women being the "weaker vessel" is presented as a Christ-and-the-church metaphor, yet similar passages on male-responsibility are taken at face-value. Interestingly, the author’s description on the manliness of the ministry includes Psalm singing. If such were a constant sign of manliness, then the RPCNA’s Testimony on Gender would be the most masculine work produced: “Society needs men and women who (like the biblical patriarch, Jacob) possess personality traits that break with gender stereotypes.” These described outward methods of the ministry—preaching techniques, catechizing, comforting, and the like—are also done by apostate churches. But their content is wrong. The masculine way of doing such things is what makes them male-acts as opposed to female doings, even if saying the same thing. Just compare a female “pastor” sermon found on social media with sermons by men. The issue then is what masculinity entails. False versions, as the article lists, should be avoided, yet the list offered is skewed. After all, assertiveness, aggression and physical dominance are part and parcel of manhood. Their misuse does not eliminate their proper function. Christian men are still men. And men are physically larger and stronger than women, hands-down. Adam was created of the earth and for manual labor of taking care of the garden. Our bodies reflect this, and so our acts and mindset should use this difference for the good of others and God’s glory. Unfortunately, this is the problem. More and more churches, parachurches, leaders and speakers ignore or downplay the physical and biological differences. Yet these also show up in personality distinctions between men and women as well. Our differences are not random but given with a purpose: men are to lead, protect and provide. And we should avoid the means, causes, occasions, appearances and provocations that would undermine this. I believe young men are seeing cracks where others see soundness. Some of it may be shrugged off as merely “appearances”—yet what else can a man go by unless he lives with the pastor at home? Performative masculinity is a serious concern, filling a void. In response, we need to look inward, examining our unspoken assumptions about manhood. One hundred years ago, there was a battle over the basics of Christianity which formed, partly, the OPC in 1936. And now the battle is an attack upon the basics of creation. The dearth of pastors from an ever-shrinking pool of young men is the evidence.
2
5
2
36
1,344
Ignore the issue at hand--though it may be a means to something greater-- and understand simply that any Left-Right unity that can be achieved is a threat to the constructed dialectic which exists to divide Americans. As always, beware Claremont...
I don’t know who needs to hear this, but siding with Palestine, wearing a lapel pin with the Palestinian flag (lol) and being “pro-Hamas” is Third World behavior It’s not “based.” It’s spiritually Leftist and anti-American.
1
56
"And a mighty angel took up a stone like a great millstone, and cast it into the sea, saying, 'Thus with violence shall that great city Babylon be thrown down, and shall be found no more at all.'" The Revelation of John, 18:21
3
48
If Henes cared about finding the young men, this would be a very different article. New Horizon has been a publication directed to the congregations of the OPC, but that surely is not his audience as there is nothing practicable here. Nor is it the young men he claims to want because this wildly misunderstands them. The only audience I can think this is directed toward is the clergy, as a self-placating message to say "Keep on gents! We're already doing the right things." But that can't be true... because, after all, where are the young men?
NEW HORIZONS FEATURE | Where are the Young Men? by Rev. Everett Henes In Christian circles, many wonder how to reach young men in a digital age, and how to encourage them to consider ministry. Rev. Everett Henes contributes to the conversation in this month's New Horizons. Read the full article here: opc.org/nh.html?article_id=1…
5
76
King Edward IX retweeted
This quoted post is unavailable.
3
28
628
6,560
The King is analogically and not univocally a father, tutor, master, and husband to his people. The King is one chosen of his brethren by his brethren to protect and provide for the well-being of his brethren. It would be wise to consider Rutherford on this matter.
Christian nationalists often argue that because a homeowner can keep people out of his house, the civil magistrate must be able to keep people out of the nation. The problem is that this logic does not stop at the front door. A father is also clearly allowed to feed, clothe, nurture, and educate his children. If the magistrate inherits every authority a father possesses simply because the father possesses it, then the magistrate should also be feeding, clothing, nurturing, and educating the citizenry. Most Christian nationalists rightly reject that second claim. They should reject the first one for the same reason. A father’s authority over his household does not transfer to the civil magistrate, whether the issue is immigration or the daily care of people. The magistrate’s duty is found not by looking at what a father does in the home, but by looking at what Scripture calls him to do: establish justice by punishing evildoers (those who break God’s Law), not “protect” or "order" the people. Protection and order are by-products of justice. (For more: tinyurl.com/spank-heinies)
7
100
King Edward IX retweeted
Making it illegal to practice Islam anywhere in the USA should be common sense. And for those afraid that doing so would produce the same scene as France, it only proves the point. What a wicked cult.
19
16
3
178
3,005
King Edward IX retweeted
The first thing France needs to do is repent of the slaughter of the Huguenots especially those culminating in August 1572. For 450+ years God has continued to judge those wicked people for touching His anointed.
1
4
1
55
763
"When the righteous are in authority, the people rejoice: but when the wicked beareth rule, the people mourn." Prov 29:2
6
101
They derogate us as "paedobaptists" so frequently, they must believe that's our actual view. If a man is converted, he is baptized. If he brings is household, we baptize his household. If his household is baptized and he has a newborn child, we baptize his child. It is household baptism. This quote in no way precludes household baptism. The error is grave, not only because the sacrament is withheld from those who are included in the covenant, but also because it is contrary to nature in that households are the atom of society, not individuals.
Paedobaptists cite Justin Martyr on baptism. Read what he said: "As many as are persuaded and believe that what we teach and say is true, and undertake to be able to live accordingly... Then they are brought by us where there is water" First Apology 61. Believers. Then water.
1
7
309
Plot twist. Christianity is properly final. Liberalism is not. The very inability to concede that the one has a right to this that the other has not is itself a cardinal doctrine of modern liberalism—e.g., the egalitarian leveling of all things including truth claims. But actually liberalism is worse than merely imperialistic. As the most triumphant (for now) modern ideology, it confuses proper political ends with busying itself with “mankind’s fate.”
3
1
21
653
King Edward IX retweeted
We’ve always heard about legalism in the church. But antinomianism is by far the greater threat to the church today—including Reformed churches. My prayer is this 50-page book helps Christians identify the various forms of antinomianism and drive these errors from the church.
14
31
4
248
6,989
Neutrality is a myth All politics is theological Power abhors a vacuum
23
123
1
1,876
18,967