Rob Green retweeted
A SuperFront Will Cross the Northwest This Weekend
cliffmass.blogspot.com/2026/…
There are no words that I can use to express the extent to which I loathe @BernieSanders. He has parasitized taxpayers for 50 years and offered less than nothing in return. A degenerate and lobotomized fool. Go back to renew your marriage vows in the Soviet Union, and please stay there.
🇺🇸 Bernie Sanders on the changes he foresees for America after the midterms:
"The American people want a tax on billionaires so that we can have universal child care, we can make public colleges tuition-free, and we can build millions of units of low-income and affordable housing.
It's time that the billionaire class, many of whom pay an effective tax rate lower than a truck driver, start paying their fair share of taxes."
Writer: Mhedi
Rob Green retweeted
Nonsense, dude. In 2024 Trump won 55% of Hispanics in Texas and 34% of Black men. Was it conveniently demographics then? We had every opportunity to deliver and didn’t.
Instead, those voters got a costly war that raised gas prices and diesel. Prolonged tariffs that increased the costs of goods, and a poorly executed immigration policy that turned people off—and that’s putting it mildly.
The “it’s the demographics” excuses should fall on deaf ears because if that were true, there’s no way in hell we would’ve gotten the numbers we received in 2024. There was a generational opportunity to realign crucial voting blocs and Republicans screwed up.
Instead of making excuses, the party needs to have a serious reality check about what is obviously not working and move forward so that the focus can be on 2028 and 2032.
In 1970, the White population in Texas was 89%.
In 2000, it was 50%.
Now it’s less than 39%.
Demographics is destiny.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
In 1970 the White population included Hispanic people because surveys in Texas didn't ask about Hispanic ethnicity as a separate question from race. In 2000 the White population for just race was 71%. Today White is 74% and "White, not Hispanic" sorted for ethnic origin is 37%. census.gov/quickfacts/TX
If you sponsor this podcast, calling for the execution of Elon Musk, I will never use your product… and will buy from both of your top two competitors
This is unacceptable and dangerous.
This a dog whistle to murder someone because you disagree with them — and this is the same guy who joked about the assassination against President Trump.
Fuck this piece of shit.
Rob Green retweeted
As a former Marine and police officer, I’ve seen people freeze or fall apart under pressure. I listened to 20-year-old Nathalia Gadelha on Learjet N722BD as it dove at over 20,000 feet per minute in an overspeed. She never stopped transmitting clear, critical information even though she had to know she was going to die. That young co-pilot stayed on the radio to the end. Most people twice her age wouldn’t have.
Let me explain reality… if you have but sixty seconds:
They were targeting Elon
They were targeting him with fake charges because the socialist-industrial complex is terrified that he would expose their long grift.
They came after him for the Model 3 and Elon’s claims around its potential.
That potential was realized, and it became, along with the Model Y, the best-selling electric vehicle ever created.
These were fake charges to try to stop somebody from building the best category-defining product.
Let that sink in: that's how evil these motherfuckers are.
The loooooong grift has been exposed: socialist grifters are stealing our tax dollars to fund fringe lunacy, NGOs and government programs without oversight or audits.
They’re parasites incapable of creating any product or service that has to compete in the open market.
Elon creates a couple of cutting-edge products each year, and half of them succeed.
Some of them actually change the world. Some of them fail brutally.
It's called capitalism. It's called creation.
This is what moves the human condition forward: trying things.
Trying really hard things.
Socialists come for the people building valuable products and services — that’s the tell
Keep your eye out for the people who've created nothing and risked nothing, but who are attacking the people who risk everything to create Something.
That's the tell.
Rob Green retweeted
Capitalism has a win condition. Socialism does not.
Here's why, explained so simply a 10-year-old could get it. It starts with a book written in 1944 by an Austrian economist named Friedrich Hayek: The Road to Serfdom.
Imagine a classroom of 30 kids. One day the teacher says: "From now on, I decide what everyone eats for lunch, which games you play at recess, and who sits next to whom. It's fairer that way."
First problem: the teacher doesn't know what you like. You hate carrots. Your friend is allergic to peanuts. Lucas wants to play football, Emma wants to draw. 30 kids, 30 different wishes. Nobody can know all of that, not even the smartest teacher on Earth. Hayek called this the knowledge problem. The information needed to run an economy is scattered across millions of heads, and it can't be gathered in one office.
Second problem: the kids start fighting. "Why does he get the window seat?" "Why football again?" Before, everyone just chose for themselves. Now every choice is a fight, because every choice is made for everyone.
Third problem: the class can't agree on a plan, so someone says "we need one person in charge who just decides." This is Hayek's key insight. Planning doesn't fail because planners are evil. A plan needs everyone to agree on the same goals, and free people never agree on everything. So the plan needs force to work.
Fourth problem, and it's the scariest one: who wants that job? The kind kid doesn't want it, because the kind kid doesn't want to force 29 people to eat carrots. The job attracts the one who likes giving orders and doesn't mind punishing those who disobey. Hayek wrote a whole chapter on this, called "Why the Worst Get on Top." It doesn't happen by accident. It happens by selection.
Here's the trap. When the person who controls your lunch also controls your job, your home, your shop and your newspaper, they control your whole life. You can't say no, because there's nowhere else to go. Controlling the economy doesn't mean controlling one part of life. It means controlling the means to every goal you have.
That's the road to serfdom. Nobody votes for a dictator. People vote for "someone should fix this," then for "give them more power to fix it," and one day they wake up with no one left to say no to.
The USSR, Maoist China, Cambodia, North Korea, Cuba, Venezuela. These are different countries with different cultures and languages, and the story has the same ending every time. When a script produces the same ending every time, it isn't bad luck. It's the script.
Now capitalism. Back to the classroom. Instead of one teacher deciding everything, every kid can trade. You give me your carrots, I give you my apple, and we both walk away happier. Nobody needs to know what everyone wants, because prices do that job. A price is a message telling millions of strangers what's scarce and what's wanted, with no one in charge.
That's the win condition. In capitalism, you get rich by making something other people freely choose to buy, so your success depends on serving others. In a planned system, you get ahead by pleasing whoever holds power. One rewards usefulness. The other rewards obedience.
And this isn't theory. Two centuries ago, almost every human being was extremely poor. In 1990, about 38% of humanity still lived in extreme poverty. Today it's under 10%. More than a billion people escaped it in a single generation. It happened when China, India, Vietnam and South Korea opened up to markets, trade and private enterprise. The largest reduction in poverty in human history came from letting people trade.
So why do so many people hate capitalism?
Because what they hate usually isn't capitalism.
They hate the bank that got bailed out with their taxes while they lost their house. They hate the giant company that writes the regulations so no startup can compete with it. They hate rent they can't afford because building new homes has been made nearly impossible. They hate the lobbyist who gets a subsidy while the small business owner drowns in paperwork.
Look closely at each one, and you'll find a state handing out privileges. A bailout is not the market. The market would have let the bank fail. A regulation written by incumbents is not competition. It's protection from competition. None of this is capitalism. It's cronyism, which is what happens when businesses stop competing for customers and start competing for politicians.
People see the symptom and blame the wrong cause. They say "capitalism failed" and ask for more state. That gives more power to the same people who created the problem, and it puts us right back on Hayek's road.
The answer to bad capitalism isn't less freedom. It's less privilege. That means fewer bailouts, fewer protected incumbents, fewer permits, and more people allowed to build, compete and trade.
Capitalism has a win condition: make things people want. Socialism has an end condition: someone has to be in charge. And history keeps showing us who ends up in that chair.
Rob Green retweeted
We really need to stop calling events where people burn buildings down and loot and rob people “protests.”
Rob Green retweeted
Former Gov. Locke: ". . . pretty soon the voters are going to say, 'The promises are not being kept, and we're just being taxed like crazy.'" knkx.org/politics/2026-10-19… #waleg
Rob Green retweeted
Scientists may have found a shortcut to fusion energy | Princeton University, ScienceDaily
Scientists have uncovered a potentially far more efficient path to fusion ignition that could bring the dream of practical fusion energy closer to reality.
Scientists at the U.S.Department of Energy's (DOE) Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory (PPPL) have identified a potentially much more efficient way to achieve fusion ignition, a major milestone in the pursuit of practical fusion energy. Their calculations suggest that changing the order in which plasma is heated and compressed could dramatically reduce the energy needed to reach a self-sustaining fusion reaction.
For more than seven decades, fusion researchers have relied on a mathematical rule to determine whether plasma can remain sufficiently hot and dense, for a long enough period, to sustain fusion without additional external heating. Known as the Lawson criterion, this equation defines the conditions required for ignition. However, it does not explain the most efficient way to achieve them.
Now, PPPL physicists Luis Delgado-Aparicio, Masayuki Ono, and Jonathan Menard have developed a more comprehensive version of the criterion. By incorporating four additional factors that influence fusion performance, they have mapped a promising route to ignition that could require substantially less energy than alternative approaches.
Their findings were published in the journal Physical Review Letters.
The research focuses on plasma, often called the fourth state of matter. Plasma forms when a gas becomes so energetic that its particles carry electrical charges. In fusion reactors, this extremely hot material contains the atomic nuclei that researchers hope to combine, releasing energy through nuclear fusion.
The ultimate goal is to produce a burning plasma, in which fusion reactions generate enough heat to sustain the process without continued external heating. Reaching this state efficiently remains one of the most important challenges in fusion energy research.
Scientists Find a Shortcut to Fusion Ignition
Delgado-Aparicio compares the discovery to finding a more efficient route through a mountain range.
Imagine that the energy requirements for fusion ignition form a landscape dominated by a towering mountain. The destination lies on the other side, but there are several possible routes to reach it.
Many proposed fusion strategies effectively attempt to climb directly over the mountain. They begin by increasing the density of the plasma and then supplying the enormous amount of heat needed to reach ignition.
The new calculations suggest that a different sequence could be considerably more efficient. Instead of increasing density first, researchers could heat the plasma before making it denser. This alternative route avoids the highest energy requirements while still reaching the desired conditions.
"A lot of companies want to climb the mountain head-on and spend enormous energy to get there," Delgado-Aparicio said. "Go around the peak instead. You reach the same place in a much smarter way, and you use far less energy."
The Hidden Mountain Pass in Fusion Physics
The researchers identified a particularly important region of this mathematical landscape called the Cordey saddle.
In geographical terms, a saddle is a low passage between higher elevations. In fusion physics, the Cordey saddle represents a relatively accessible point along the boundary separating plasma that still needs outside heating from plasma capable of sustaining its own fusion reactions.
To evaluate different routes, the scientists used a measurement called Q, which compares the power produced by fusion reactions with the external heating power supplied to the plasma.
For example, a Q value of 5 means the fusion reactions produce five times as much power as the external heating system delivers.
In an idealized plasma containing only pure fusion fuel, the Cordey saddle occurs at approximately Q = 5. However, actual fusion systems are much more complicated. Contaminants within the plasma and extremely strong magnetic fields can shift the location of this passage, increasing the Q value needed to reach it.
Understanding how these conditions change is essential for determining whether a proposed fusion reactor can realistically achieve ignition.
A More Realistic Roadmap for Future Fusion Reactors
The findings could influence the design of two major types of magnetic fusion devices: tokamaks and stellarators.
Both approaches use powerful magnetic fields to confine plasma while it is heated to the extraordinary temperatures needed for fusion. Tokamaks, which have a characteristic doughnut shape, are among the leading technologies being investigated for future fusion power plants.
Research institutions and private companies are pursuing several different ways to generate electricity from fusion and eventually deliver that power to the electrical grid. Identifying an efficient route to ignition could help engineers design more practical systems while avoiding costly mistakes.
For PPPL, this work is part of a broader effort to address the scientific and technological challenges that must be overcome before commercial fusion power becomes possible, including the development of future fusion pilot plants.
One of the study's major advances is that it evaluates several important physical processes together rather than examining them separately, as much previous research has done.
The researchers incorporated four additional factors that can influence whether a plasma reaches and maintains ignition:
- Helium ash buildup: Fusion reactions produce helium as a byproduct. As this spent fuel accumulates, it can dilute the remaining fusion fuel and reduce performance.
- Plasma contamination: Light and heavy impurities can enter the plasma from materials lining the inside of the reactor, interfering with fusion conditions.
- Synchrotron radiation: Electrons traveling through magnetic fields emit radiation, carrying energy away from the plasma.
- Heat loss: Energy continuously escapes from the plasma, and these losses can become greater as its temperature rises.
Accounting for these effects produces a more realistic picture of the conditions future reactors must achieve.
"When you leave these effects out, you say the design will work fine," Ono said. "When you put them in, the picture changes, and it becomes quite important."
According to Ono, the goal is to establish a more reliable, widely applicable model that scientists can use to evaluate fusion reactor designs before construction begins.
Treating the Lawson criterion as a single unchanging threshold overlooks physical processes that can substantially alter the requirements for ignition. Including those effects early in the design process could prevent expensive problems later.
"Fusion experiments cost a great deal of money, and you do not want to make mistakes you could have caught beforehand," he said.
Tiny Amounts of Tungsten Could Make Fusion Much Harder
One particularly striking finding concerns tungsten, an extremely heat-resistant metal selected for the interior walls of more than a dozen next-generation fusion machines.
Tungsten is attractive because fusion reactors must withstand conditions involving plasma temperatures greater than those found at the center of the sun. However, the material also presents a significant challenge if even tiny quantities enter the plasma.
The team's calculations show that tungsten contamination at a concentration of just one part in 10,000 can approximately double the pressure required to achieve fusion ignition.
That is a substantial increase caused by an exceptionally small amount of material.
The calculations were initially developed in two dimensions. When the researchers extended their analysis to three dimensions, they found that the pressure needed for ignition could exceed the limits at which the plasma remains stable.
This suggests that seemingly minor contamination could have major consequences for the feasibility of certain fusion reactor designs.
How Energy Losses Could Help Stabilize Fusion
Surprisingly, some of the processes that make ignition more difficult may also help fusion reactors operate more safely and consistently.
Scientists have long investigated the possibility of thermal "runaway" instability. This occurs when heat from fusion reactions increases the reaction rate, producing still more heat and potentially creating a self-reinforcing cycle.
The researchers found that energy losses within the plasma can naturally counteract this effect.
Although those losses increase the difficulty of reaching ignition, they also provide a balancing influence that could allow a burning plasma to maintain a stable operating state without constant adjustments.
This balance could be valuable for future reactor designs.
(Unlike a fission power plant, a fusion system holds only seconds of fuel at a time, so losing control means the plasma cools and the burn stops rather than anything worse.)
Liquid Lithium and Advanced Fuel Could Improve Fusion Efficiency
The study also identifies technologies that might help overcome some of the obstacles revealed by the calculations.
One possibility involves coating the inside of fusion reactors with liquid lithium, a technique PPPL researchers have investigated for years.
These coatings could help prevent tungsten from entering the plasma while reducing heat losses, making it easier to maintain the extreme conditions necessary for fusion.
Another promising approach uses spin-polarized fuel. This involves preparing the atomic nuclei so that their spins are aligned before fusion occurs, which can increase the fusion reaction rate.
Together, these strategies could improve the performance of future reactors and make the path to ignition more achievable.
What Comes Next for the New Fusion Strategy?
Despite the promising findings, the proposed heat-first approach has not yet been demonstrated experimentally.
The research is theoretical and relies on mathematical calculations rather than direct measurements. Existing fusion experiments have not reached the temperatures associated with the Cordey saddle, preventing scientists from testing the predicted route under those conditions.
The PPPL team plans to investigate the approach further through digital experiments, using computer-based simulations to explore whether heating plasma before increasing its density can deliver the expected advantages.
If future studies confirm the calculations, the findings could provide an important foundation for designing more efficient fusion systems and help researchers make better decisions about reactor construction.
"While more study is needed, we are excited by these results, and they suggest a clear path forward for future research in this area," said Menard.
Read more:
sciencedaily.com/releases/20…
Rob Green retweeted
Tired of the media asking how we will pay for state government without an income tax in WA.
Simple: the same way we have since 1889, without one.
WA has record revenue. Never before have we had as much revenue as we do at this very moment. And it’s still growing!
We also have a record $80B budget, that spends more than we are even projected to receive. It’s a spending problem, not a revenue problem.
Since Democrats took large majorities in 2017, they’ve spent us into oblivion, raised the largest amount of taxes in history, made us one of the most unaffordable states in the country, and probably the most insulting… after all of that we don’t get anywhere near the results for the amount of money they take out if our pockets.
WA has more homelessness and drug related deaths than ever, the lowest amount of police and too much crime, 30 year low in academic outcomes, a broken criminal justice system, we are facing down $4B in lawsuit payouts, we can’t fairly compensate or protect our employees, we can’t build housing or deliver permits on time, our front line service workers are exhausted and broken, our hospitals are on the brink of financial collapse, we are allowing babies to die from fentanyl exposure, we don’t lead in clean energy, our forests burn every year with devastating wildfires, and low income people are first in line at the democrat chopping block.
No president or Congress created these problems.
This is a great state, there is nowhere in the world as beautiful and rich a place as Washington State in my opinion. But the politics are ruining it. People are making difficult choices to escape their home to survive.
40 years of Democrat one party rule is killing our state. The best of times were under a more balanced state government, forcing parties to work together on common sense instead of fighting over the insane. That one party rule has entrenched ideologically radical leaders in state agencies more focused on politics than service, a court system more focused on ideological outcomes than justice or order, an entire industry of politically motivated grifters who waste or even defraud us to maintain control, and possibly a new supermajority where they’ll make sure we can never return.
Maybe you look at the national scene and lose hope. But our problems are local, and we should focus intensely on those problems. Despite who has run the federal government in any given year our problems have persisted across many administrations and congresses.
Ever the optimist, I have great hope for our state and its people. Some have lost faith, but there’s always another chance to turn back from the ledge and restore sanity. I also know for a fact that the number of reasonable people in WA is greater than the extremists, they just have to show up, and demand something better.
You’ll have your chance to do that this month by voting and making sure everyone you know does. It’s a tired trope to say “this is the most important election”. For our state at least, there are red flags and promises made by the elite that set us up for a generation of misery, and for me that CANNOT be allowed. It’s time now to fight back… reject tyranny, reject communism, and say “no kings” to the radicals torching our state to ashes.
Rob Green retweeted
Mike Ditka was the best. Watch Will Ferrell talk about him popping his hip back in during the filming of 'Kicking & Screaming' then going right back to acting.
We lost a legend today.
Rob Green retweeted
Along the Old Tiburon Trail, where I often atone for my sins with a vigorous 8-mile ruck and film dirt-cheap commercials for Pure Talk on my iPhone, there’s a charming old gazebo where I sometimes pause to rest in the shade, gaze across the bay toward The Golden Gate Bridge, and contemplate the meaning of life. It’s called The Little Lori Gazebo, and it was built by a woman named Barbara Meislin, known to the locals as The Lady in Purple, since that’s the only color she ever wears. Barbara even lived in a purple house, until it burned down in 2009.
Anyway, the gazebo was built as a memorial to her daughter, Lori, who died very young, and I’m not the only one to enjoy its shady charm over the years. I’ve noticed however, that’s it’s been in need of repair, and last week, as I was filming one of those dirt-cheap commercials for affordable wireless while rucking along the Old Tiburon Trail, I noticed that the long overdue refurbishments had finally begun. I also met the contractor who was hired to do the work.
“Holy crap! It’s you!”
Since there was no one else around, and because the man was looking directly at me, I quickly deduced that I was the object of his query.
“You are correct,” I said. “It’s definitely me.”
The man struck me as delighted. Perhaps, a bit too delighted.
“This might sound a little creepy,” he said, “but I took this job because of you."
“You’re painting a gazebo because of me? Why?”
“I’m not just painting it,” he said. “I’m rebuilding everything below the roof.”
“Because of me?” I asked. “I don’t understand.”
“I don’t normally bid on projects this small, but I’ve been wanting to meet you for a long time. And I’ve seen those ads you do while hiking along this trail. I figured I might run into you during the work, so I bid on the gig. And now, here you are!
“You’re right,” I said. “That does sound a little creepy.”
The man laughed and walked toward me, hand out-stretched, as I unclipped the hip-strap on my ruck, just in case I had to drop the 60lbs on my back and run away. I’ve had some unusual encounters over the years and learned that running away is often the best option.
“Name’s Mike Sanguinetti,” he said. “My daughter and I have seen every episode of Dirty Jobs, and we love everything you do. I run a Painting and Construction Company here in town.”
The logo on his tee-shirt confirmed the claim. And the presence of a daughter was comforting. I relaxed.
“Mike Rowe,” I said. “Nice to meet you.”
We shook hands and Mike Sanguinetti said, “You know, I saw you in Vegas last year at SEMA, when you were auctioning off that truck for your foundation. I stood in line to meet you, but you had to go before I got a chance to hello. I waited around for hours.”
“You’re making it creepy again,” I said.
Mike laughed. “I just wanted a chance to tell you, in person, what Dirty Jobs meant to my daughter and me. Best father/daughter bonding time ever. And I really love what you’re doing for the trades. Means the world to us independent contractors.”
Like a lot of guys in the trades today, Mike Sanguinetti has a front row seat to the skills gap. He runs a small operation, and deals with all the challenges I talk about at mikeroweWORKS everyday. We talked about those challenges for a few minutes, along with the importance of a decent work ethic, and the extraordinary opportunities for those who would simply master a skill that’s in demand.
“Maxine won’t believe this,” he said. “She thinks I’m crazy for believing we’d run into each other.”
“Maxine is your daughter?” I asked.
“Yeah. She’s in high school now, plays varsity volleyball. But we still watch Dirty Jobs whenever it’s on. It’s kind of our thing, you know?”
“That’s nice,” I said. “Can I send her a video?”
“Oh my God,” said Mike. “She won’t believe it.”
Mike handed me his phone, I recorded a personal message to Maxine, and that was that. Mike thanked me for being the same guy he knew from the TV, (or at least, for appearing to be,) and I thanked him for going so far out of his way to say thanks.
“Seriously,” I said. “On a percentage basis, how much did the possibility of meeting me factor into your decision to bid on this gazebo job?”
“At least 95%. Maybe more.”
“Well, congratulations,” I said. “You’ve made it creepy again!”
Mike laughed and went back to work, as I walked off to film another commercial for affordable wireless, thinking all the while about the good fortune that allowed for two Mike’s with wildly different skill sets, to work on the same trail.
I had to travel the next couple days, but when I threw on the ruck three days later for another 8 miles of penance, I walked by the gazebo and was blown away by its transformation, and the speed with which the work had been completed. One guy, armed with the necessary skills and a work truck filled with the necessary tools was all it had taken to restore Little Lori’s Gazebo to its former glory.
I’ve attached a photo, along with a shameless plug for Sanguinetti’s Painting and Construction. He does good work. instagram.com/p/Dd7Xv8ZhI4t/
Happy Trails, Mike!
(You too, Maxine.)
PS. The Lady in Purple, Barbara Meislin, is now 91, and by all accounts, delighted by Sanguinetti's work.
Like young Maxine, Barbara has excellent taste.
Hey @AlaskaAir imagine my surprise this morning when I couldn't enter your lounge that I paid for because I'm not flying your airline. I'm not flying Alaska - you don't fly to my destination. Seems reasonable to want to use the airport lounge I paid for when @ airport. 1M miler.
Rob Green retweeted
🇬🇧 “You are not going to carry a cement mixer on a pushbike”
Liberal Politician in London wants to eliminate the use of White Vans and states she has done the research to show tradesmen can carry around Ladders & Tools, even fridges on ‘Cargo Bikes’
These people are legit clinically insane
Rob Green retweeted
💪 HERO: Captain Machchhar tells 🇮🇳PM Modi what happened in the FlyDubai 1073 cockpit:
“When I was on the ground, I realized that the aircraft is going down, and I told myself, ‘This is the last push Smit. The door is right there.’
And I was still getting hit, but I opened the door.”
🎥: @foxandfriends
Rob Green retweeted
“The first lesson of economics is scarcity: There is never enough of anything to satisfy all those who want it. The first lesson of politics is to disregard the first lesson of economics.”
— Thomas Sowell
Rob Green retweeted
🇮🇳 REMEMBER THIS MAN: CAPTAIN SMIT MACHCHHAR.
An Indian captain flying hundreds of people from Dubai to Tel Aviv was stabbed in his own cockpit.
Wounded, bleeding, with the aircraft plunging thousands of feet, he fought back.
Then passengers and crew did something extraordinary:
They stormed the cockpit.
They restrained the attacker.
Other pilots took control.
And that plane LANDED.
Hundreds of families got their loved ones back today because ordinary people refused to freeze when everything went wrong.
Captain Smit Machchhar — India and the whole WORLD should be proud of you. 🇮🇳
And to the passengers and crew who ran toward the danger instead of away from it:
Heroes. Every single one of you.
This is what courage looks like.



























