Lucky Luke (@ruggedprogram) header
Lucky Luke (@ruggedprogram) profile picture

Antifragile market participant. My beats are slamming from the rugged programming.

Cape Town, South Africa
Joined December 2007
Photo by Lucky Luke (@ruggedprogram)Photo by Lucky Luke (@ruggedprogram)Photo by Lucky Luke (@ruggedprogram)Photo by Lucky Luke (@ruggedprogram)Photo by Lucky Luke (@ruggedprogram)Photo by Lucky Luke (@ruggedprogram)Photo by Lucky Luke (@ruggedprogram)Photo by Lucky Luke (@ruggedprogram)Photo by Lucky Luke (@ruggedprogram)Photo by Lucky Luke (@ruggedprogram)
Replying to @NateB_Panic
Are you saying white South Africans took up arms against Apartheid? A very tiny minority of them did. Most loved the warped system that privileged them, as do Israelis. Interestingly, a large proportion of the whites who DID oppose Apartheid, were Jews. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Catego…
3
11
734
Replying to @Glenn_Diesen
No lies detected.
10
Replying to @HedgieMarkets
This likely failed because those 7k employees were given a completely new and imperfect tool to do jobs they'd already learned to do without it. A transition like this is hard to do at scale. You need people that genuinely * want * to use and know * how * to use the tool, without creating a big mess.
40
Replying to @JeroenSwart
misallocation of a marker as causation? squeezing a grip strengthener probably won't make my ticker last forever.
1
138
Replying to @blknoiz06
this shit now 83% muh BTC short squeeze 💀 biggest bulltweet event of all time etc
74
I made another Grand Tour dashboard. If you find a bug or have a cool feature request, lemme know and I'll probably build it!
3
169
Replying to @jedifractal
don't try to draw any cash money, you need to book 3 months in advance and bring a DNA sample.
1
1
45
Lucky Luke retweeted
Vladimir Putin was put in charge of Russia at the end of 1999, to protect the men who had just sold the country for parts. But within four years, he had jailed the richest one, forced two others out of the country, and taken the oil back. Not many know this. Because the West has done a fantastic job painting a very different picture of Putin. To understand him, you have to know what the 1990s did to Russia. Prices went up about 2,500% in 1992, and everything an ordinary family had saved was worth nothing within a year. Life expectancy for Russian men fell from 64 to 57, which normally only happens in a war, and there was no war. By 2000, 42 million Russians were officially poor. Nearly a third of the country. None of this was an accident. Western advisers helped design it, and the International Monetary Fund lent Russia money on the condition that it kept going. In 1995 the government handed twelve of Russia's biggest companies to a small group of bankers for about $800 million all together, a tiny fraction of what they were worth. So when Russians who lived through that hear Western leaders talk about freedom and open markets, they do not hear an idea. They remember the years their money became worthless, their factories were given away to men who became billionaires overnight, and their fathers died at 57. President Boris Yeltsin and the people around him chose Putin because they thought he would be easy to manage and would leave the new owners alone. In July 2000 he called those owners into a room and told them they could keep their companies as long as they stayed out of politics. One of them refused. Mikhail Khodorkovsky was the richest man in Russia, he funded opposition parties, and he opened talks to sell a large piece of his oil company to an American oil giant. He was arrested in 2003, his company was taken apart and absorbed by the state, and two men who owned television channels left the country. Nobody needed the rule explained twice. Then, Putin paid Russia's debts instead of borrowing more. In 2006 he cleared the last of the old Soviet Union's debt in a single payment of $23.7 billion, years ahead of schedule, and kept government borrowing low for fifteen years after that. He also ruled that whenever oil sold above a set price, the extra money went into a national savings account instead of being spent. Poverty fell from nearly a third of the country in 2000 to 7% by 2024. Much of that was oil getting expensive rather than anything clever, but Russia stopped being a place where men died at 57. What the West misread about him had nothing to do with communism or empire. Putin wanted Western money, Western machines, and Western customers. What he would not accept was a deal where foreigners owned the oil fields, the oil was priced in somebody else's currency, and the payments ran through somebody else's banks, because that hands the other side a switch they can turn off whenever they want. He said this out loud at a conference in Munich in 2007, and Western officials heard it as a threat rather than as information. Ukraine was not a surprise either. In April 2008, NATO announced that Ukraine and Georgia "will become members." Two months earlier, America's own ambassador in Moscow, William Burns, who later ran the CIA, had warned Washington that Russia would not negotiate on this and would treat it as a military threat. Washington went ahead anyway. Russian troops were in Georgia by August. Russia took Crimea in 2014. The Minsk agreements were supposed to settle the fighting that followed in eastern Ukraine, and Germany and France signed them as the outside powers who would hold both sides to their word. In December 2022 Angela Merkel, Germany's chancellor at the time, said the real purpose of Minsk had been to buy Ukraine time to prepare. France's president then said the same thing days later. So who came out ahead in this Ukraine war? European factories ran for thirty years on cheap Russian gas that arrived by pipeline, and it is gone. Somebody blew up the Nord Stream pipelines in September 2022, Denmark and Sweden closed their investigations without charging anyone, and no country has ever been held responsible. Europe now buys American gas that arrives frozen on ships and pays far more for it. Its chemical and fertilizer plants are shutting or moving abroad, many to the United States, and its governments are buying weapons again, mostly from the American arms companies that spent twenty years selling into the Middle East. Russia had $300 billion of savings sitting in Western accounts, and it was frozen in Belgium. Every central bank outside the West watched that and learned their money can be taken. Russian oil goes to China and India now, sold at roughly a quarter below the market price, and the refineries buying it keep that difference. Russia's central bank has interest rates at 14%, which crushes anyone who needs to borrow, and expects the economy to grow by close to nothing this year. Russia also sold 44 tonnes of gold in the first six months of 2026, after twenty-four years of buying it and almost never selling. The spendable part of that national savings account has fallen from $113.5 billion in 2022 to $51.6 billion. He is paying for this war by selling the savings he built to prove Russia could never be starved out. How the war ends is also already written down. In December 2025 Zelensky published a peace plan with twenty points worked out with Washington, and eighteen of them were agreed. The two that were not agreed are who controls the Zaporizhzhia nuclear power station, and who controls the Donbas region. On the power station, the American proposal is that the United States, Russia, and Ukraine each own a third, with Americans running it. On Donbas, the American proposal is that Ukrainian troops leave the part they still hold and the area becomes a free economic zone. Russia calls that same land a demilitarized zone. Two names for one thing, so both governments can sign without admitting what they gave up. And about 40% of Ukraine's mineral wealth is buried under land Russia already occupies, including two of its four large lithium deposits. Ukraine's own government values what sits under occupied ground at more than $350 billion. Putin has publicly invited American companies to come and mine those exact deposits with him. So this does not end with America taking the minerals and Russia taking the land, because the minerals are under the land. Russia keeps the land, and pays for the world accepting that by letting American companies dig up what is underneath. Ukraine is the only country at that table that owns less in every version of the plan.
80
460
43
1,796
182,678
Lucky Luke retweeted
For my first post, I’m sharing a letter @NVIDIA signed on why open models matter. AI will transform every industry, power every company, and be built by every country. Open models strengthen safety and cybersecurity, accelerate innovation and diffusion, and enable sovereignty. The world needs both frontier closed models and frontier open models. images.nvidia.com/pdf/Open-W…
15,949
29,198
10,950
171,175
66,534,131
You literally closed by account without reason and have kept nearly £12,000 you have not returned. You said it was because of Bitcoin, but I never used @wise to buy Bitcoin. It turned out it was because a Bitcoin company paid an invoice. You froze my account, froze my funds and have not returned a VAT payment that was sent to you.
Replying to @KarolisRudelis
We hear your frustrations. Please note that we never close accounts without a reason: wi.se/accountdeactivation As to replying: it can take some time for us to review your appeal or get back to you. For urgent questions, you can call us through our help page (1/2)
315
529
60
7,210
687,499
Nothing says Claude wrote this email like "I need your steer" 🐮 I'm not lending you my cows, go get your own.
1
3
189
Lucky Luke retweeted
Saylors ponzis nuking while BTC stays somewhat afloat The world is healing
75
60
7
1,584
108,454
Replying to @MarketBubble
Banks looks like he needs a bailout. Somebody put that brother to bed.
263
like he said, things never change
35
Sir, you voted for Trump 3x believing he and his family were not using the office for insider trading and related grift? Insider trading likely rampant since his first term. Volatility = profit extraction and largely explains the chaotic nature of his administration.
1
101
Replying to @WhalePanda
Direct IQ <-> price correlation if you buying this shit in a bear.
201
Replying to @ggreenwald
Burnham is liked and did some good stuff in Manchester, but will be co-opted by the same cabal behind Starmer - he has never really stepped out of line on foreign policy.
65
Replying to @DonAlt
Does Iran get the 300B or do US contractors get it and recycle it back to US, as per Iraq War? Not diminishing the Iranian achievement and US shitshow, but this is the usual order of business in US / ME wars.
139