There is a clear difference between the language of a street thug and that expected from the head of a security and investigative institution. In any modern country, no senior official could keep their position for even an hour after speaking like this.
Threatening people for expressing political opinions on social media is an attack on freedom of expression. The NCCIA is supposed to investigate cybercrime, not intimidate citizens or silence political dissent. Criticism of the government, state institutions and those in power is not a crime in itself. No public official should use their position to threaten people simply because they disagree with their views.
@NCCIAOFFICIAL shame.
Another attempt by Pakistan Bar Council to interfere in our elections!!
First it was KBA now it’s SHCBA.
We strongly oppose this amendment whereby elections are to be postponed till January 2027.
People saying, “Ay Zardari, Bhutto ko kya munh dikhaogay?” Bro.. he can show the same face Bhutto showed the people of Balochistan in 1973, when he dismissed the elected provincial government and imposed the Governor’s Rule.
Navi Pillay, who led the UN commission that concluded Israel was committing genocide in Gaza, has received the Nobel Prize... Meanwhile, Pakistan nominated Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize.
South Africa has shown more courage in standing up for Palestine than most Arab and Muslim states, including Pakistan and Türkiye.
An Interior Minister ( @MohsinnaqviC42)
cannot simply stand at an immigration counter and treat his personal suspicion as a substitute for a proper immigration assessment. What expertise or training does a politician have to personally determine, from a few documents at the airport, whether a student is a genuine visitor or whether every document presented is credible?
If the documents are genuine, the visa is valid and the applicant has provided the required evidence, then any objection should be specific. If the authorities believe something is incorrect, identify the document, identify the discrepancy and explain the legal basis for refusing departure. Simply saying that someone has no previous travel history is not, by itself, proof that they are not a genuine traveller.
Every person who travels internationally has a first trip. A lack of previous travel history cannot automatically become a reason to stop someone. Otherwise, how is a young person ever supposed to establish a travel history in the first place?
The youth are trying to study, work, attend professional opportunities and build better futures.
Immigration control is important, but it must operate through clear criteria, evidence and transparent reasons. If a genuine document is being rejected, the individual deserves to know exactly what is allegedly wrong with it. Arbitrary decisions at the immigration counter can have serious consequences for people's education, careers and futures.
After 13 years, Junaid Hafeez’s appeal finally received a substantive hearing at the Lahore High Court.
The court raised serious questions about the social-media evidence and the legal process.
13 years imprisoned. 7 years on death row. Appeal was filed in 2020.
Today brought hope, but why did justice take so long?
#JunaidHafeez #LahoreHighCourtLahore












