Replying to @jd_pressman
these things are commodities and they look like pretty great commodities from my perspective. imagine how much lower value it would be if you had to have a special harness just for openai or just for google to let their models write code or do clerical work...
this is the right way to think about tehse problems and it's correct, of course. it also means that you should have a mental model of what additional connectivity *kinds* would improve your architecture's improvement the most. you can think *ahead* of nvidia's scaleup choices.
xitter.cf/bryancsk/status/211424…
no, i'm not writing a joke in the previous post, arxiv is now an exclusive journal i guess, ...
Replying to @sameQCU @difficultyang
client_a: "you're a policy working on fizz problem doing buzz. {task}. do your best!"
client_b: "you're a reward model working on fizz problem doing buzz. {algorithm}. do your best!"
doesn't have any clear reason for *degrading* performance in either role, i suppose?
Replying to @difficultyang
one thing i toyed with a long time ago was telling a llm (by a statement in whatever text template i was using) that they were being trained to serve as a reward model following a certain objective function, just in case it made it easier for them to 'make judgements on purpose'
Replying to @teortaxesTex
'research' that doesn't improve the quantity of RL evidence made per unit time, per unit accelerator, per load of a tensor into registers, whatever, cannot be considered 'research' in this day and age regardless.
Ok, I just checked this, and its literally running a freaking TensorFlow Lite model on 960×540 images with INT8 quantization every couple of seconds in an attempt to figure out what game you are playing.
It's literally called "alex.tflite" and its literally AlexNet and seems to follow torchvision.models.alexnet. As far as I can tell this does some strange nearest neighbor feature comparisons against a DB and literally doesn't work 99% of the time, you love to see your CPU get wasted every other second by this thing though. It also just seems to dump its results into the void because the consent gate comes later.
Anyways, here's the tf model graph and some dumped captures.
live-tweeting on samsung findings were fun.
i'll let my agents give it a bit more time, but this document is already the most comprehensive breakdown of some key concerns of tizen i've seen run on a live device.
it takes like a good while for me just to scroll through it (there's about 44 writeups as of right now on individual functionality).
release is probably happening in a few days.
サメQCU retweeted
"the bitter lesson for search is to grep over a filesystem, just like how google works" - rich sutton
Replying to @norvid_studies
Norvid decision model...."this could be a gwernsite"
Replying to @Sauers_
simply regularize reduction order in floating point operations so there's no signal available in the noisy channel implied by floating point operation order. galaxy brain take but this would also make pretraining more numerically stable (post training too)











