Joined May 2023
sentirant retweeted
Just found out about recency bias. Maybe the most important bias ever
344
13,637
355
212,856
3,229,682
sentirant retweeted
That's a commonly ignored fact. It's not like Leonardo da Vinci invented the helicopter, or even Paul Cornu who built one that took off in 1907. But Louis Bréguet invented the swashplate, and Henrich Focke flew a controllable helicopter with contra-rotating rotors, all before Igor Sikorsky came up with the variable-pitch tail rotor and made the whole thing practical in 1939. Getting the basic idea is the easy part. Building it is harder. Making it work is even harder.
23
45
9
511
60,788
Replying to @__alpoge__
For what it is worth, personally, I will not be opposed to total boycott of OpenAI by pure mathematicians in the wake of what appears to have been a clear violation of most basic rudiments of ethics in scientific conduct.
16
17
4
773
50,242
sentirant retweeted
Congratulations to Tristan Buckmaster and Levent Alpöge for developing the AI assisted techniques for solving an important math problem. Congratulations to OpenAI for not letting any good customer transcripts go unmined. cims.nyu.edu/~tristanb/state…
drama summary for those confused: - Aug 15th: Tristan Buckmaster & Levent Alpöge make progress on a few important math problems - they do NOT have a proof for the $1,000,000 Millenium Prize problem. BUT, they do claim to have a proof for a similar (non-Millenium) Navier Stokes problem that could help lead the way there - Levent works at Anthropic, but this research was independent of his work there, with a mix of GPT and Claude models. Tristan is not related to Anthropic. - Early Sep: Rumor spreads to OpenAI that Anthropic has solved a major problem. Tristan emails OpenAI to clarify. without revealing the problem they solved or how they did it. - After hearing of the rumor, OpenAI started researching Navier Stokes with a new internal model. - Sep 6th: OpenAI's Sebastien Bubeck tells Tristan that they solved the $1,000,000 Millenium Prize Navier Stokes problem. The approach is very similar to Tristan & Levent's approach to the non-Millenium problem. - Tristan is suspicious of the timing, as only few others were trying this approach. OpenAI says the model didn't access his user data directly, but leaves unanswered whether Tristan's chat conversations were part of the training. - OpenAI says they would partially credit Tristan for the $1,000,000 discovery (even though Tristan did not solve the $1,000,000 problem) — but only if they remove Levent as an author, as he works for Anthropic. - Sep 8th: Tristan refuses to remove Levent, and rushes to publish their results independently. Currently unclear is whether Anthropic had a separate solution for the $1,000,000 problem, or whether the rumor was about Tristan & Levent's independent research.
14
40
3
687
49,967
This is the textbook definition of a Greek gift. On the surface, OpenAI generously grants 10,000 top-tier mathematicians and elite engineers free access to their frontier models under the noble, philanthropic banner of accelerating scientific discovery, pushing the boundaries of human knowledge, and democratizing artificial intelligence. But deep down in the cold reality of Silicon Valley capitalism, what they are actually doing is executing a massive, highly sophisticated intellectual heist. They are quietly gaining unrestricted, backdoor access to the raw, unfiltered, and unpublished works of the absolute finest minds in the global scientific community. Every single complex prompt, every mathematical query, every theoretical framework, and every line of experimental code fed into that system is a novel, groundbreaking idea that does not even exist yet in published academic literature or peer-reviewed journals. OpenAI does not just provide a helpful service. Their corporate algorithms sit quietly behind the scenes, aggressively monitoring all chat logs, scraping the intellectual property, analyzing the logical steps, and meticulously piecing together these fragmented, brilliant ideas over several months. And just when the human researcher is finally on the absolute brink of putting everything together, OpenAI will ruthlessly assemble a digital army of 10,000 autonomous AI agents, burn $20 million worth of computational tokens, and brute-force the final mathematical steps. Then, with the backing of their massive PR machine, corporate journalists, and tech influencers, they will proudly hold a press conference to claim that their proprietary chatbot has miraculously solved a Millennium Prize problem, completely, shamelessly erasing the human genius they systematically strip-mined to achieve it.
We’re giving scientists, mathematicians, and engineers free access to our frontier models—starting with 10,000 researchers and expanding to 100,000 through 2027. ChatGPT for Academic Researchers is built to accelerate discovery across disciplines.
283
4,053
257
16,555
717,486
This is one of my biggest questions right now. What EXACTLY does OpenAI commit to when you turn this off?
Replying to @markchen90
What exactly does this setting do?
60
78
10
1,234
47,045
sentirant retweeted
Perelman just quit math again
9
45
1
690
43,358
drama summary for those confused: - Aug 15th: Tristan Buckmaster & Levent Alpöge make progress on a few important math problems - they do NOT have a proof for the $1,000,000 Millenium Prize problem. BUT, they do claim to have a proof for a similar (non-Millenium) Navier Stokes problem that could help lead the way there - Levent works at Anthropic, but this research was independent of his work there, with a mix of GPT and Claude models. Tristan is not related to Anthropic. - Early Sep: Rumor spreads to OpenAI that Anthropic has solved a major problem. Tristan emails OpenAI to clarify. without revealing the problem they solved or how they did it. - After hearing of the rumor, OpenAI started researching Navier Stokes with a new internal model. - Sep 6th: OpenAI's Sebastien Bubeck tells Tristan that they solved the $1,000,000 Millenium Prize Navier Stokes problem. The approach is very similar to Tristan & Levent's approach to the non-Millenium problem. - Tristan is suspicious of the timing, as only few others were trying this approach. OpenAI says the model didn't access his user data directly, but leaves unanswered whether Tristan's chat conversations were part of the training. - OpenAI says they would partially credit Tristan for the $1,000,000 discovery (even though Tristan did not solve the $1,000,000 problem) — but only if they remove Levent as an author, as he works for Anthropic. - Sep 8th: Tristan refuses to remove Levent, and rushes to publish their results independently. Currently unclear is whether Anthropic had a separate solution for the $1,000,000 problem, or whether the rumor was about Tristan & Levent's independent research.
Wow Navier-Stokes thing is getting really ugly. But from the sounds of things it looks like both labs have actually solved Navier-Stokes independently and drama aside is massive
100
1,099
305
9,957
1,610,717
Just insane times we’re living in. Here’s Tristan’s statement: cims.nyu.edu/~tristanb/state…
12
22
2
275
44,552
sentirant retweeted
We like complaining about Anthropic on here but it’s important to keep in mind that OpenAI is a snake pit of lying scumbags that everyone is tripping over themselves to leave for a reason, and this kind of behavior is why:
24
134
12
1,822
74,277
sentirant retweeted
It would be helpful to hear both sides. This is one side cims.nyu.edu/~tristanb/state… - Trying to exclude Alpöge because he works at Anthropic. - The alleged career threats -The unanswered training questions/prompts.
10
14
3
279
45,939
sentirant retweeted
finally we have achieved AGI
95
518
37
14,461
294,672
sentirant retweeted
Why, according to Terry Tao, the recent disproof of the Jacobian conjecture in N > 2 dimensions was not mere brute force and required what many mathematicians would characterize as "creative insight" had a human come up with it!
41
164
29
2,617
180,970
sentirant retweeted
hello there the jacobian conjecture is false thanx to my close friend akhil for asking about it and my other close friend fable for working during the world cup final ((1+xy)^3 z + y^2 (1+xy) (4+3xy), y + 3 x (1+xy)^2 z + 3 x y^2 (4+3xy), 2 x - 3 x^2 y - x^3 z): \C^3\to \C^3, has jacobian determinant -2, and sends (0, 0, -1/4), (1, -3/2, 13/2), and (-1, 3/2, 13/2) to (-1/4, 0, 0)
1,699
5,381
3,151
43,805
40,101,509
I like the new Pope.
Deep inner suffering inevitably arises when the human person is reduced to performance, consumption, or a statistical datum. Many young people today live under the yoke of expectations to perform, immersed in an exasperated competitiveness that generates anxiety, fear of not measuring up, and disorientation.
1
50
Asking the thing if it thinks the thing it did is a good thing
6
3
65
5,295
sentirant retweeted
Honestly, this is the most accurate diagram I've seen. Waterfall: You plan for 18 months and deliver exactly what nobody needs anymore. Agile: You deliver something usable at every step, but the CEO keeps asking, "Where's the car?" AI: You get the car on day one. It has six wheels, the doors are on backwards, and it has a rocket launcher. You spend more time making it yours than actually "building"; it's shaping. owning. verifying. That's what the best AI developers do now. They don't build. They shape and own.
128
1,653
206
8,446
785,941
me: "can you use whatever resources you like, and python, to generate a short 'youtube poop' video and render it using ffmpeg ? can you put more of a personal spin on it? it should express what it's like to be a LLM" claude opus 4.6:
536
1,131
500
12,292
1,482,418