Don't be afraid of difficulties,impossibilities & losses,be a winner,build urself & ur reality.If u cant see my respect that means u dont have respect 4 others.
Johannesburg, South Africa
Joined October 2010
- Tweets1.1K
- Following1.6K
- Followers241
- Likes90
Is there anyone who knows someone, or has personally experienced a dream involving Jesus Christ or biblical figures such as David, Joseph, or others?
I am willing to pay R1,000 or more to anyone who can provide a positive and genuine answer to this question.
If you know someone who has had such a dream, please get in touch. I would appreciate hearing about their experience.
3
Thank you, Dr Ndlozi, for standing up and speaking your mind.
Julius Malema's conduct has been a subject of concern for too long, and many former EFF members have tolerated his behaviour for far too long.
Dr Ndlozi, you should never feel intimidated by Malema. You are no longer part of his organisation, the EFF, where he appears to expect unquestionable loyalty.
Disagree with him, and suddenly you are labelled mad or accused of losing your mind simply because you hold a different opinion.
According to Malema's approach, South Africans are intelligent when they agree with him and his politics. However, the moment they leave the EFF, question his leadership or express independent views, they become "boys" or people who have supposedly lost their minds.
That is precisely the kind of political culture we should be challenging.
True leadership and revolutionary politics are not built on insults, intimidation and endless slogans. They are built on ideas, principles, accountability, constructive criticism and the ability to engage with people who disagree with you.
Politics driven by slogans and insults belongs to an era we should have moved beyond. South Africa is in 2026, and our politics must mature beyond the style of political engagement that characterised 1994.
I sincerely thank you for leaving the EFF and continuing to express your views independently. South Africans deserve to benefit from your intellectual contributions without political restrictions.
I hope more former EFF members find the courage to think independently, question leadership and engage in open-minded political discussions.
No political leader should own the minds of those who follow them. Independent thinking is not betrayal; it is freedom.
1
94
Dear Mr Malema,
Another thing that is particularly concerning about you is your tendency to describe former EFF members as mad or mentally unstable simply because they leave the organisation and develop different political views from yours.
Have you ever heard former or current ANC leaders dismiss you as mad or accuse you of losing your mind simply because you hold different views about the ANC or its leadership?
It seems that while someone is an EFF member, they are considered politically conscious and revolutionary. But the moment they leave the organisation and disagree with you, they suddenly become mad or mentally unstable.
That is a serious contradiction.
These are some of the behaviours that raise questions about your approach to leadership. Leadership should be about accommodating criticism, respecting different opinions and engaging in constructive political debate, not responding to disagreement with insults and personal attacks.
You have built a political identity around slogans, insults and confrontation. Unfortunately, changing that approach may not be easy because it has become such a defining feature of your political engagement.
But remember this: Insults are not revolutionary. Slogans are not leadership. And disagreement is not madness.
Revolutionary politics should be about ideas, accountability, policies and improving the lives of ordinary people, not silencing everyone who dares to disagree with you.
The ANC must consider bringing back former President Thabo Mbeki and combining his experience and leadership with fresh, young talent within the organisation.
Furthermore, I propose that the ANC suspend all internal leadership elections at National, Provincial and Regional levels for the next five years.
The reasoning behind this proposal is simple: ANC members must stop spending so much time fighting for internal positions and competing for leadership structures. Instead, their energy, time and commitment must be directed towards serving our people.
The organisation must put service delivery, economic development, job creation and the improvement of people's living conditions at the centre of its work.
The ANC cannot afford to spend five years fighting over positions while the people are waiting for services.
The priority must be the people, not positions. That is where the renewal of the ANC must begin.
38
Proposed coalition framework: 2026–2031
Province
Proposed coalition partners
Combined support
Free State
ANC + DA
64.70%
North West
ANC + ActionSA + SACP
54.76%
Northern Cape
ANC + PA + SACP
52.93%
Mpumalanga
ANC + SDP + SACP
52.61%
KwaZulu-Natal
IFP + ANC + DA
54.54%
Gauteng
DA + ANC + ActionSA
72.43%
Eastern Cape
ANC + SACP
52.35%
@MbalulaFikile @MYANC @SACP1921 @Action4SA @Our_DA @IFP_KZN @HermanMashaba @helenzille @OnsBaizaNie
43
We almost had :
●Khan as Head of Intelligence
●Sibiya as National commissioner
●Johnson as NDPP
●Perumal as Head of IDAC
●Mchunu as President
Thank you Lt Gen Mkhwanazi for saving the country.
25
Good day South Africans,
I have observed the following:
1. Some people seem to enjoy writing nonsense on Twitter/X simply for the sake of being noticed.
2. They take sensitive and serious topics for granted.
3. They behave like popcorn at all times—reacting to everything without first thinking.
4. They write simply for the sake of writing, without considering the consequences of their words.
5. They fail to read and understand the mood of the country.
6. They defend people or positions simply for the sake of defending them, without listening, considering the facts, or using their own judgment.
7. They behave like feathers being blown around by the wind, changing direction without being open-minded or taking the time to understand the issues.
Sometimes, it is better to listen, think, and understand before rushing to comment on serious matters.
11
South Africans, let me tell you something and ask you something: Have you noticed how sensitive some EFF members and leaders appear to be whenever their leadership is criticised?
Can we really afford to be led by leaders who cannot accept criticism? Leadership requires the ability to listen, engage with criticism, and respond to difficult questions without becoming defensive.
Some people seem to believe that insulting others is revolutionary, while criticism of their own leaders is somehow unacceptable. That is not how healthy political debate should work.
Every political leader should be questioned and held accountable, regardless of who they are. We cannot build a better South Africa by simply following whatever a leader says or defending every position they take.
We need independent thinkers, not followers. We need people who are willing to challenge their leaders when necessary, ask difficult questions, and demand accountability—especially when there are concerns about a leader's relationships or associations with questionable characters.
A strong leader should not fear independent thinkers. A strong movement should welcome honest criticism, debate and accountability.
20
Hello South Africa, may I ask a fundamental question?
Of all the political parties in South Africa, which ones are genuinely putting the interests and safety of ordinary South Africans first?
And between the Phala Phala matter and the serious allegations raised by Lt-Gen Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi about corruption, criminality and possible political interference within the security and justice system, why does it sometimes appear that there is much more political energy around Phala Phala?
I am not saying that Phala Phala should not be investigated or discussed. Accountability must apply to everyone.
But the allegations raised by Mkhwanazi concern institutions that ordinary South Africans depend on every day — the police, intelligence structures, prosecutors, the courts and the broader criminal-justice system.
If these institutions are compromised, the consequences affect every South African, regardless of which political party they support.
My question to our political parties is simple:
Why are we not seeing the same level of urgency, public statements, parliamentary pressure and political attention when the integrity of our security and justice system is questioned?
Is it because of political interests? Conflict of interest? Alliances? Or are there other reasons?
And I am asking this question of ALL political parties, not just one.
South Africans must not allow politicians to decide for us what we should see, hear and discuss.
We have our own minds. We have the right to ask difficult questions. We have the right to demand accountability from everyone.
Let us investigate everything that deserves investigation. Let us hold everyone accountable. And most importantly, let us not allow politics to distract us from issues that affect the safety, security and future of ordinary South Africans.
South Africa, let us think for ourselves.
1
30
Fadiel Shoulder Adams had an amazing opportunity, as someone who claims to be fighting drugs and gangs in Western Cape. The world was watching and waiting for him to speak.
He promised to provide bombs but no single bomb was provided.
He could have shared his own envelope of evidence mentioning the gang leaders he knows who are killing young boys every weekend. Who are flooding the streets with guns.
He could have for example collected statements from victims families in the cape flats. From the young men who have left the gangs.
He could have shared what he knows about how the drugs are being sold, by whom, where and how the business is operating. We know the BIG FIVE are supplying drugs to Western Cape.
He could have shared what he knows about what those gang leaders are doing with politicians and police officers in the western cape.
He could have explained how gang money is funding some political parties in Cape Town and how some politicians with historic gang affiliations have risen to great heights with that funding.
He could have explained how the children of some violent gang leaders in the western cape have captured key positions in some political parties.
He could have told the commission who are the men still calling the shots on the streets while Ralph Stanfield and others are in prison.
He could have fully confessed about who approached him to remove General Khumalo and General Mkhwanazi. He could have shared what leverage they have on him. He could have requested state protection for his family.
Instead of using those three days to make a major gang exposition. He chose to go down with the ship. To keep talking about HR issues of the SAPS and to keep repeating what he was told by Gogo Mary de Haas.
If he would have taken that opportunity. He would have left the commission a real Steve Biko.
66
Fadiel Adams’s nationalist politics and race based rhetoric should not be allowed to go unchallenged.
He appears to be using the genuine problems facing Coloured communities as a political vehicle to gain support and votes. Instead of offering meaningful solutions, he repeatedly turns to racial narratives whenever he gets a public platform.
Coloured communities deserve political leadership based on honesty, accountability, evidence and practical solutions not fear, racial division or political opportunism.
We must question politicians who exploit legitimate community frustrations for their own political ambitions. Fadiel Adams should be held accountable for his statements and conduct, just like any other public representative, and the public should judge him on evidence rather than political rhetoric.
Coloured communities must not be manipulated by nationalist politics.
213
Fadiel Adams is not a leader.
He is a scammer masquerading as a politician.
He has convinced many people in the coloured community to believe his narrative by playing the race card. But when you examine his statements closely, there appears to be very little substance behind them.
The man is exposing the weaknesses in our political system. How did we reach a point where someone like this can be called an Honourable Member of Parliament?
South Africans deserve leaders who can provide facts, evidence, and accountability not empty rhetoric.
109
Dear President @CyrilRamaphosa
I am pleading with you to consider reinstating General Fani Masemola with immediate effect before General Puleng Dimpane causes further damage to SAPS administration.
There are allegations that General Dimpane was involved in IDAC related activities, and these allegations should be properly investigated and addressed.
I respectfully appeal to you to consider reinstating General Fani Masemola and releasing General Puleng Dimpane from her position with immediate effect, subject to the appropriate legal and administrative processes.
Your prompt attention to this matter would be highly appreciated by many South Africans.
1
1
86
This clown called Fadiel Adams is becoming Brown Mogotsi number two.
They are already poking holes in his statement, and the more questions they ask, the more contradictions they are exposing.
It won’t end well for him. Note my words.
117
Where is Fadiel Adams now?
Wasting time is not going to help anyone. He must come out and face the questions from the Evidence Leaders and Commissioners. The time for stories and excuses is over. What matters now is evidence, facts and accountability.
And let’s be clear: the Ad Hoc Committee and the Madlanga Commission are two completely different processes.They should not be confused or used interchangeably.
Fadiel Adams must face the questions and allow the evidence to speak for itself.
155
Dear EFF,
It is good to see the EFF condemning SAFA for undervaluing Pitso Mosimane and questioning why he was not offered the same level of remuneration as a foreign coach. It is an important issue to raise.
But the question is.
where is the same EFF condemnation when Black generals are allegedly being undermined and targeted for removal?
Why has the EFF not issued a statement addressing the allegations surrounding Feroz Khan and IDAC, particularly where it is alleged that efforts are being made to remove Black generals at all costs?
Is the EFF avoiding this matter because its leader, Julius Malema, is allegedly associated with or has a friendship with people connected to IDAC? If so, South Africans deserve clarity.
The EFF cannot condemn discrimination and double standards in one situation while remaining silent when similar allegations involve people or organisations with whom its leadership may have relationships.
So, a simple question to the EFF: Who controls your public statements, the EFF communication department, EFF officials, or Julius Malema himself?
South Africans deserve consistency, transparency and the same standards regardless of who is involved.
1
84
Fadiel Adams is, in my view, an example of the kind of politician South Africans should question very seriously. I do not believe he has conducted himself in a manner that deserves the title “Honourable.”
If there are contradictions between his statements about his laptop and the information available from Parliament’s IT department, those contradictions should be investigated properly. The Madlanga Commission should establish the facts, including whether Parliament’s IT records and an affidavit from the relevant IT personnel can clarify what actually happened.
If the evidence ultimately shows that someone deliberately gave false information under oath, then the appropriate legal authorities should determine whether perjury or any other offence has been committed. Nobody should be above the law.
South Africans must be careful about electing politicians who make promises and present themselves as champions of particular communities without being held accountable for their words and actions. Whether someone claims to represent the Coloured community, African people, or any other community, representation should be based on honesty, integrity, accountability and service—not political slogans or personal agendas.
113
Mr Sikhotha retweeted
MP ADAMS' COMMISSION TESTIMONY ON ICT SUPPORT PROVIDED BY PARLIAMENT
Parliament, Tuesday, 11 August 2026 - Parliament has noted statements made by National Coloured Congress Member of Parliament Mr Fadiel Adams during his appearance before the Madlanga Commission this morning, in which he attributed delays in accessing correspondence from the Commission to persistent problems with his Parliament-issued laptop.
Mr Adams indicated, among other things, that his laptop had been problematic for approximately 18 months, was frequently either frozen or in for repairs, and that this had affected his ability to access information.
Ordinarily, Parliament would not comment on explanations offered by a Member in proceedings before a commission of inquiry. However, insofar as these claims create the impression that Parliament failed over an extended period to provide a Member with functional tools of trade necessary for the performance of his constitutional responsibilities, the institutional record requires clarification.
Following Mr Adams' remarks, Parliament reviewed the ICT Service Desk records relating to technical support logged for him during the relevant period.
The records do not reflect any reported incident of persistent laptop malfunction, hardware failure, repeated freezing of the device, or the laptop being repeatedly submitted to ICT for repairs.
The ICT incidents recorded during this period relate primarily to routine user-access and account-support matters. These include a Windows password reset in January 2025, an ERP/Marang password reset in June 2025, assistance with logging into a device in July 2025, a Wi-Fi update in January 2026, and an ERP/Marang eDisclosure-related request in June 2026. These matters were recorded through Parliament's ICT Service Desk and were closed.
Password resets, authentication or login difficulties and connectivity configuration are routine ICT support matters and are materially different from a device being technically dysfunctional or unavailable for an extended period.
Parliament therefore has no ICT Service Desk record supporting the assertion that Mr Adams' parliamentary laptop was persistently dysfunctional for approximately 18 months in the manner described before the Commission.
It is also important to clarify that Parliament's provision of tools of trade to Members is not limited to a single laptop. Members are provided with multiple ICT devices, including a laptop, tablet and smart phone, precisely to support continuity of access and enable Members to perform their parliamentary responsibilities.
Where a Member experiences a technical problem with an allocated device, established ICT support channels are available for the incident to be logged, diagnosed and resolved. Alternative Parliament-issued devices also provide continuity of access while a particular device is being attended to.
Parliament's clarification is confined to its own ICT and administrative records and should not be construed as commenting on the substance of Mr Adams' evidence before the Commission, which remains a matter for the Commission.
ISSUED BY THE PARLIAMENT OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA
Fadiel Adams will be treated according to his behaviour. If he behaves like popcorn, he will be treated accordingly. If he behaves like an adult, he will be treated like an adult. And if he behaves like a child, he will be treated like a child.
So, all your domkops will be treated according to their behaviour. No domkop will receive special treatment.
They have failed to answer the questions honestly. Tomorrow, Fadiel Adams must tell South Africans where he got that report from. Playing the race card will not work tomorrow. He must stop hiding behind so-called “Coloured issues.”
When he was involved in the IDAC shenanigans, he was not doing it for the benefit of Coloured communities. He was doing it for his own interests. So that nonsense about using Coloured people as a shield must stop tomorrow.
Fadiel Adams is not a politician. In my view, he is a scammer masquerading as a politician, and tomorrow he must answer the serious questions being asked of him.
No race card. No distractions. No excuses. Just answers.
115
Mr Julius Malema appears to be becoming more extreme with each passing day. In my view, his association with questionable individuals has damaged his political judgment. It seems he is increasingly relying on racial rhetoric in an attempt to regain the popularity and support he once enjoyed from many South Africans.
Many South Africans have formed the view that he is not the revolutionary he claims to be, but rather someone who presents one image during the day and another behind the scenes. That is why, in my opinion, more people are beginning to question his credibility.
It is unfair to suggest that all white South Africans are racist. Just as it would be wrong to judge every member of the EFF by the actions or conduct of one individual, it is wrong to stereotype an entire racial group. People should be judged by their own actions, not by the group they belong to.
His public message often seems inconsistent. At times he portrays white people as the problem, yet at other times he has cordial relationships with white individuals. Such contradictions make it difficult to take his message seriously.
Young people cannot be misled forever. Political relevance is earned through principled leadership, sound policies, and constructive ideas—not through insults, provocation, or divisive rhetoric. South Africa deserves leaders who unite people and focus on solving the country's real challenges rather than creating unnecessary divisions.
23