Michael Pouchet retweeted
"Ectopic pregnancies never survive. They are nonviable 100% of the time"
I have been told a variation of this probably 20 times over the past couple days by smug pro choicers and smug pro-lifers.
Why are they so confidently wrong? What's behind that?
Thomas Smith implanted in his motherโs fallopian tube. In this 2014 interview, he noted the absurdity that medical professionals were recommending to perform a c-section in order to snuff out his life, but they refused to perform a c-section in order to try to save him.
Smithโs motherโs response to her doctors when they advised she needed to abort Thomas was, โIf my baby has to die, then I will too.โ Smithโs mother survived.
Thomas Smith survived and was born at 7-months gestation. He shared the following verse describing his motherโs love and courage:
John 15:13
Greater love has no one than this, that someone lay down his life for his friends.
๐ conceivedinrape.com/2014/01/โฆ
Michael Pouchet retweeted
Slave owner: You say donโt own people and we donโt, blacks arenโt people.
Nazi Soldier: You say donโt exterminate people and we donโt, Jews arenโt people.
Pro-abort: You say donโt kill people and we donโt, pre-born humans arenโt people.
Abortion is Homicide.
Michael Pouchet retweeted
Baby Relieved He Made It Out Of The Womb Before Democrats Won Midterms buff.ly/VjFjkRe
Michael Pouchet retweeted
I was born into poverty. I'm glad my mother didn't murder me. No, being murdered is not better than living in poverty. We were a happy family despite poverty.
Michael Pouchet retweeted
If you have taken the first abortion pill, regret your decision, and want to continue your pregnancy, there is hope for you and your baby. pregnancyhelpnews.com/doctorโฆ via @PHC_News
Michael Pouchet retweeted
In a world of Dave Chappelle's.
Be a Charlie Kirk.
Michael Pouchet retweeted
This is what a baby looks like at 19 weeks.
Baby Walter was not just a clump of cells.
Michael Pouchet retweeted
George Floyd was a drug addled violent criminal hobo who died of a drug overdose and then was venerated as a literal saint while leftists burned down entire city blocks in revenge. Charlie Kirk was a political commentator who never committed any crimes and was gunned down on camera while speaking peacefully in front of an audience, and nobody responded by rioting or committing any acts of violence or reprisals anywhere at all. So, no, joking about George Floyd is not the same as joking about Charlie Kirk. The two men, and the circumstances around their deaths, and the subsequent reactions, have no resemblance at all. There is no comparison except that they both died, and that's it. Anyone trying to draw this moral equivalency is lying or stupid or both. And any conservative claiming that we have to tolerate the Charlie jokes because we criticized George Floyd is a submissive cucked shill and should be disregarded on this issue and every other.
Michael Pouchet retweeted
The โjokesโ about Charlie Kirk are heinous for reasons that have nothing to do with the fact that I agree with his politics. There is just something especially callous and soulless about gloating over a brutal, bloody murder we all saw with our own eyes. He was a young man and father of young children. We saw him get shot in the neck. The blood pour out. The natural human reaction when seeing something so violent, bloody, and shocking is to be moved and shaken by it. If instead youโre gloating and joking, it shows that this human part of you is dead. You truly are a soulless goblin in a way thatโs only vaguely distinguishable from the guy who actually committed the murder. Thatโs what makes your callousness so disturbing for those of us who still have souls. Weโre human and you no longer are. And that makes you a monstrosity to us. Weโre not โoffendedโ so much as revolted by the sight of you. Youโve become the spiritual equivalent of a maggot eaten corpse. You are a grotesquery, a morally disfigured beast.
Michael Pouchet retweeted
I find the pro-choice position intellectually absurd because it requires us to accept that being human is an objective biological fact, but having human rights is not. Some humans have rights, others do not.
The same human being can have a right to life at 24 weeks if born prematurely, but no such right at 40 weeks if still in the womb.
And somehow weโre supposed to believe that this is a coherent super intellectual moral philosophical position rather than the actual truth which is, that this is all an attempt at softening the language and reality that some people just simply want to kill their own children.
You wish to blame rapists for all abortions though they only account for 0.4% of cases.
So dishonest (and cowardly).
The other 99.6% are babies killed after being proceated by consensual sex.
Woman chooses to have sex and then kills her own innocent child.
Monstrous.
Michael Pouchet retweeted
Pope Leo XIV denounces abortion in Uruguay:
โThe unborn already belong to the human family, and to the future of their people. Their absolute dependence on their mother does not diminish the dignity to which they are entitled, nor to the protection they deserve. Jesus Himself chose to assume this condition.
Welcoming a new life requires that fathers assume their responsibilities alongside mothers, that the family offers their support and that social conditions exist that allow both parents to raise and care for their children.
Protection of the unborn and the support of those who welcome them are inseparable. The family remains the primary setting in which each person is welcomed and learns to life with others.
St. John Paul II, who also had the joy to visit this land, expressed this in a phrase that retains all of its original force; โAs the family goes, so goes the nation and so goes the whole world in which we live.โโ
