Ironic considering that a brown man succeeded in restoring order to El Salvador and solved a problem far worse than the grooming gangs in Europe.
Maybe you could learn a few stuff from foreigners.
Lust can turn people into selfish ghouls, so I understand that wariness of the flesh
> Radfems are the exact same kind of misanthropic freak as the AI bros in silicon valley and the average diehard trump supporter. All of these people hate you, are a threat to society, and should be treated as such.
Accidental gigastacy moment
That kind of talk is why xenofeminism will be the only relevant form of feminism in the upcoming years.
Biology is part of the problem and any solution that doesn't target it will never be long lasting or complete
The question is why someone like you won't leave it despite all the supposed disadvantages you suffer from
This Post is from a suspended account. Learn more
Because pragmatically speaking it's better to have a set age limit than to have vague criterias which will certainly allow for teen marriage if some imam deems marriage between a 14yo and a 30yo okay.
The west chose 18, I don't think it's bad but I'd go higher if I could.
Over the years I came to the realisation that it's not enough to keep the top 1% in check. You also need to crush the lumpenproletariat.
The lumpen are even more of a threat to the working and middle classes than the top 1%.
That's great, but you shouldn't undermine the fact that there are many women who are forced to wear it either by the state or by family pressure.
And yes these case has more severe consequences .
My friend, this isn't a debate about whether IQ is heritable or not. It's a debate whether you understand that collective trends don't negate individual variety.
Which you clearly don't.
Virtually everyone with White ancestry descends from Charlemagne, which shows the inevitable trend of our descendants is the racial average. IQ is far from 100% heritable. Political views are even less heritable.
How do you make something better for women? You make it Whiter.
Merely supporting the existence of non-Whites is in fact an anti-feminist position, but as a Christian with a love for all humanity, I do it anyway. If you have a secular feminist view and you follow it to natural conclusions, it looks a lot like jeopardizing the very existence of people like you.
You can wish away the existence of non-white people as much as you want, this isn't happening as we're the dominant phenotype across the world and genes related to our appearance are dominant while yours are recessive.
If you lack the IQ to understand the difference between the individual and the average at the national level, then there isn't much I can do for you.
Wasn't it you guys who kept pushing the idea that it's the content of your genes that determine your traits and life trajectory?
You're birdbrained if you think third world radfems are in favour of free male movement around the world.
If anything we're far more likely to be ruthless on these issues than even the most right-wing white person you'd come across.
I stand with my wife in opposing masculinist oppression from herself that I don't even lift a finger to enforce.
Also, you should realize that the best thing you can do for White women is not reproduce or project your third world gender polarization on them. We can't even begin to reasonably think about intrawhite mistreatment of women while people like you exist and can be in our countries, third world ideas about radical feminism are fundamentally a paralytic poison to allow your men to come in and treat our women far worse than we could ever dream of.
I stand with my white sisters in opposing all kind of masculinist oppression, either from their own men or from foreign men
It will be oppression through Nordic voluntaryism and women will like it too much to escape (not you, stay in Africa). #Synnytystalkoot
The reason you're in this position is because of the rhetoric you've been pushing this whole time.
The extremists you've been arguing with are simply taking your arguments to their logical conclusions.
unavailable
