Infra Coder with a militant interest in DevOps and Systems Thinking. Speaks with a funny accent. **Evangelist of Life**. DAF

Derry / Londonderry
Joined August 2009
Waiting patiently for @deno_land to sort the merge conflict out for Deno 2.9.8 so that we can roll out the fixes for the eMudhra cert authority
157
Paul Stack retweeted
I am thrilled to tell you that Swamp Club has raised $7m in seed funding from @AmplifyPartners, Encoded Ventures, @jesserobbins, and @stolinski. Swamp is a platform for building AI systems from repeatable behaviors, rather than from token-hungry agent-centric designs. More exciting to me than the money (which I'm stoked about,) or the product itself (which continues to surprise and delight me every day,) is the incredible group of people who have started solving real, practical, everyday problems with Swamp. They teach me new and exciting things about how to build with AI every day. I'm grateful to my co-founders, who have poured every ounce of their creativity, passion, and intelligence into Swamp. I'm grateful to our users and customers (big and small) - there is no greater gift you can give to an entrepreneur than the validation that comes with voting with your wallets. And I'm grateful to our investors, who see the opportunity we see, and want to make it happen with us. It's such a cliche to say that there has never been a better time to build - but really, it feels like there has never been a better time to build. Come join the Club. swamp-club.com/press/swamp-u…
28
8
4
118
8,669
Paul Stack retweeted
We're throwing a little meetup and getting together to talk about Swamp / the cool things people are building with Swamp in San Francisco on October 28th. swamp-club.com/meetup Come meet the team, listen to some talks, talk with other community members, and eat some good food.
3
5
374
Paul Stack retweeted
Here’s the truth about where the industry is at with AI adoption: most of it is awful, and most of us are suffering under the weight of it. Early on, the bet was that the models are really smart and we will just chuck everything at them and let it sort it all out. This has largely led to incredibly wasteful, in-reproducible solutions - like huge skills and MCP, where the agent re-solves your problem a million times, getting it right some percentage often. Turns out it’s hard to get that to produce real value beyond individual experiences. As engineers, we have struggled to get our heads around how to use these capabilities effectively. Is it the harness? An agent? A factory? A tool call? Maybe a skill? How about a dark factory! We need RAG! No, RAG sucks, we need… you get my point. Everyone needs to take a breath, and start thinking about this new capability as a component of your systems, rather than the substrate upon which your systems get rebuilt. Meanwhile, coding agents got fucking fantastic. But for most of us, we changed nothing about our SDLC except that now we should be doing it all faster, because agents. That leads us to be stuck like a surfer in the chop - being responsible for everything but in control of nothing, with an avalanche of code nobody looked at when they wrote it, but that you’re responsible for ensuring doesn’t break the world. Luckily, we can stop the madness spiral. Breathe. We can engineer our way out of this problem. Are you working on how to use AI to improve your SDLC? If so, start by looking at how it works now, and using AI to automate it. Where in the process do you need intelligence? Is it there. How much do you need? Use that to decide your model. Encode the standards. Swamp, and primitives like it, are a part of how you do that. They solve problems like how to break the problem down into reusable components, how to store data, how to build the contract between components, how to string them into workflows, and how to expose that to agents, ui, or whatever you want. The way out of the suffering is to turn our engineering brains back on, and start building in ways that enable and support the future.
13
15
1
91
6,581
IT JUST GOT INTERESTING!!! As a person who didn't find a model I liked past Opus 4.6 (except GPT Terra...) Now I have my choice :D
2
2
338
As if by magic, the normal message of "this new model is great and it has been my daily driver for the last few weeks" - that means the day they shipped Fable 5.2 they changed away from using that model and used this instead.... curious
1
1
344
Been trying to upload a GitHub Release for about an hour now with no error but it's doing nothing - @githubstatus says there's no issue but their API says otherwise...
1
341
I think I am being dumb - but there's really no built in equivalent of `claude -w` for @opencode ?
1
210
So the majority of coding agents have standardised on AGENT.md and the same skills style - but the way to configure your own settings in them differs wildly :/
1
1
282
Went to sign up for a Google AI Account and it's so fucking confusing as to what I am paying for. Had I a personal google account and not made my email a workspace account, it would be way more straightforward
1
1
224
Paul Stack retweeted
Anyone that works in AI is working the hardest they've ever worked in their lives. On the surface it's somewhat ironic (AI should give us back time!), but the reality is that it's the most fun, fascinating and empowering epoch in human history. The intelligence revolution.
345
603
179
6,697
680,299
Paul Stack retweeted
however you feel about the reading code debate as an exercise you should try talking to the LLM and see if you can get to confidence about the code without directly reading the code
102
35
9
1,143
70,480
I wish I could quantify it and present the evidence but I am pretty disappointed by the trend in the frontier models. They peaked for me at Opus 4.6 - each model after introduces token bloat, incredible cost increases, more verbose output and less good outcomes for me 1/
5
1
8
1,069
I have tried gpt models and they feel incredible slow - people tell me they are blazing fast... my the "feelz" I get doesn't suggest that. As a person who is continually trying to increase my productivity and the efficiency of my software flow, I am definitely concerned. 3/
1
1
189
I saw some positivity with Google Antigravity (AGY) yesterday and Gemini 3.1-pro but meh I know the people training and creating these models are incredibly smart but, as a user, I feel there's something missing in them right now. Token efficiency is only part of that. YMMV 4/4
127
Added support to Swamp today for @AmpCode @pidotdev and Google AntiGravity. The list of native agent integrations is growing :)
1
9
701
I need to do a comparison of Opus 4.6 price vs Fable 5.1 price - I have not moved because the token bloat of Opus 4.7, 4.7 and 5 were bad for me and not giving good results I did a bunch of work with Fable 5 earlier this week and almost blew my weekly limit...
2
4
630
TL;DR: If the workload can be handled well by Opus 4.6, it has a substantial cost advantage. Fable 5.1 needs to produce meaningfully better results, require fewer retries/agent steps, or make heavy use of cached context to justify its 100% premium on input and output tokens.
1
128