ℚ𝕦𝕣𝕒𝕟𝕋𝕒𝕝𝕜

[47:3] This is because those who disbelieve are following falsehood, while those who believe are following the truth from their Lord. GOD thus cites for the people their examples.

Ezekiel in the Bible really had a way with words:

Christian apologists claim, “We have all the things Jesus said.” The Gospels refute this: John 21:25; 20:30; 16:12; Mark 4:33–34; Luke 1:1; Acts 1:3. John 21:25 says Jesus did more than could ever be written, while Luke 1:1 confirms that many other accounts existed.

In 2 Kings 22–23, the Law of Moses was “rediscovered” during the reign of King Josiah, and they found out that they weren’t supposed to allow male cult prostitutes in the Temple. Yet somehow they were able to preserve the oral law going all the way back to Moses. 🤣

An unbroken chain of oral transmission going all the way back to Moses at Mount Sinai… yet somehow, the location of the mountain itself was lost to history. Makes you wonder what else might have been lost along the way.

Sunni Islam follows a different religion than the Quran [Quran 4:21] How could you take it back, after you have been intimate with each other, and they had taken from you a solemn pledge?

Isn't it interesting how Christians and Muslims are so quick to identify atrocities attributed to God in each other's religions, yet fail to apply the same moral standards to their own? Moral consistency shouldn't depend on which religion you're defending.

This did not go as he planned 😆🤣

According to Hadith, Muhammad foretold everything that would happen until the end of the world (Bukhari 6604) Yet apparently, that didn’t include the advent of toilet paper 🧻😂 Meanwhile, the Quran has Muhammad explicitly deny possessing knowledge of the future (7:188)

Medieval European Christians claimed Muhammad: 🕊️ Trained a dove to eat grain from his ear, claiming it was the Holy Spirit giving revelation 🐂 Trained a bull to deliver the Quran on its horns as a miracle ⚰️ Had his iron coffin suspended in midair via magnets 🤣😂

Clearly Grok doesn’t understand the hikmah of the fly in the drink Hadith

But Hezekiah and Josiah?

The Prophet and the first four successors (Commanders of the Faithful) took deliberate measures to preserve the Quran's distinct authority, ensuring it was not confused with any other writings and discouraging Muslims from preoccupying themselves with competing religious texts. Yet Sunni Islam went on to develop volumes of Hadith attributed to the Prophet, gradually elevating their religious authority: First as subordinate to the Quran (Abu Hanifa, who was criticized for not taking from Hadith), then as a form of divine revelation equal in authority to the Quran (al-Shafi'i, who maintained that the Sunnah could not abrogate the Quran), and eventually to a position where hadith could even supersede Quranic rulings, associated with the rise of Hanbali traditionalism. The elevation of Hadith/Sunnah gave rise to maxims such as: "The Sunnah rules over the Quran, but the Quran does not rule over the Sunnah." "The Quran needs the Sunnah more than the Sunnah needs the Quran." This raises a fundamental question: How did a community that began by protecting the Quran from competing religious texts end up elevating its own texts above the Quran?

Christianity made 2 doctrines central to salvation: Jesus’ divinity (the Trinity) & his death and resurrection for humanity’s sins. Yet Jesus preached repentance, righteousness & obedience to God’s law. He never made belief in Trinity or his resurrection a condition of salvation