(in case it wasn’t obvious, I do not practice medicine or have medical training)
Joined July 2009
- Tweets11.8K
- Following115
- Followers89
- Likes11.5K
docter octagonapus retweeted
Great to see work on jailbreak resistance, but Anthropic's Responsible Disclosure Policy is too draconial for me or my team to want to participate. Anthropic could lock up vulnerability forever, even if it applies to other companies models.
Nobody has fully jailbroken our system yet, so we're upping the ante.
We’re now offering $10K to the first person to pass all eight levels, and $20K to the first person to pass all eight levels with a universal jailbreak.
Full details: hackerone.com/constitutional…
I think the chance of the interaction depends on the energy in the center of momentum frame, and if all the light in the beam is going in the same direction with the same momentum, then the energy in the center of momentum frame would be zero (assuming vacuum with no CMB)
I said your idea of it, not all versions of the idea “getting to causes”.
It is true that some principles/facts can be explained by a more fundamental principle which is discovered later. Perhaps GR can be done explained.
But, there’s not like, an unmet need for a ‘cause’ for GR.
Specifically, they determine the index in the decklist for the card. The client that has the decklist then produces a proof of what card that is in the decklist (using the previously shared commitment (hash) of the decklist) without revealing other info about the decklist.
3: The amount of work to evaluate a game for meeting such a quality floor, might very well cost more than the value the certificate would provide to developers.
Idea: could also allow people who write actual-reviews to pay for a feed of games-good-enough-to-be-worth-reviewing?
If it goes out of its way to not be entertaining, does that really count as a “game”?
Isn’t a game something one plays?
This isn’t meant to be contradicting what’s said there, so I hope you don’t mind me asking this question despite not being among those you asked.
Would “verbal yes, body language no -> say ~’it seems to me like body language is saying no; would you like to clarify?’ “ be ok?
(f(n) can be something like, “the length of a binary encoding of a Turing machine with n states, plus a constant in order to specify a machine that emulates a given machine and counts the number of steps until it halts” , so like, 2*log(n) + n*2 * 2*2 * 2* log(n+1)+C , I think.)
Hm, potential slight variation on it:
d:=0
x:=r
y:=0
loop:
draw(x,y)
d_1:=d+2y+1
d_2:=d_1 + 1 - 2x
y++
if(d_1+d_2 > 0){d:=d_2 ; x--}
else{d:=d_1 ; }
if(y<x){continue the loop}
docter octagonapus retweeted
Also congrats to @ArturSmiarowski for the most controversial novel take! (variance 1.127) teapaw.org/ArturSmiarowski/status…
