Sometimes rude, sometimes crude, mostly here for the ratio. Also, check out my debut action-thriller in my Linktree.

United States
Joined October 2018
When you come back and find your account unlocked:
2
1
1
17
13,281
Because scripture is inerrant it is infallible.
Scripture is not “infallible,” it’s inerrant It needs an infallible teacher to say what it means so that it is no corrupted You are not that infallible teacher
1
33
No. It’s like anything else that may start off innocently and spin off into absurdity.
When Protestants think about the development of Marian dogmas like the Immaculate Conception or her perpetual virginity, they speak as if the Catholic bishops rubbed their hands together mischievously in an effort to pull people away from Christ, when in fact, the Marian dogmas are designed to protect and encourage deeper encounter with Christ. Proper Christology produces proper Mariology.
7
The fact that there are Zeus worshippers says otherwise.
There's zero evidence for no Zeus.
1
15
Everything you like about the modern world, Christianity is directly responsible for.
Christianity is an insult to human intelligence.
9
Yes. And the reason why is simple: you don’t obey God. God demands your total loyalty and affection and you refuse to give it to him so why would he let you into his presence exactly?
Here’s a question Christianity never makes as simple as it should be: Does a genuinely kind nonbeliever go to hell while a terrible person who sincerely converts before death goes to heaven? If yes, heaven measures belief better than character.
12
He’s mentioned by Josephus who was a first century Roman historian who wrote about the history of the Jews.
9
What’s wrong with harming people and violating their rights?
Murder and rape are wrong because they cause immense harm and violate the rights and autonomy of other human beings. If you need a god to tell you that murder and rape are wrong, that says a lot more about you than it does about atheists.
14
When you deny the inerrancy of Scripture you have no grounds for dialogue.
Even if the Bible was inerrant (it’s not), no one’s interpretation of Scripture is inerrant so it’s really just a false appeal to certainty. Theology gets way more interesting when we set it free from having all the right answers and let it be a dialogue.
8
Bro, you disagree with 100% of the church fathers.
If you disagree with 100% of the Church Fathers, You’re wrong.
12
What if I told you that the “evidence” is overblown and argued fallaciously?
5
You quoted the entire verse and yet miss what it says. Feel free to honk your own nose clown.
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
14
How do you know that your words are your words without arguing in a circle?
Even worse. When i asked him about how he knows scripture is gods word, he argues circularly
7
Jesus was a man. Fully man. He is not man in the same sense that he is God, that’s the nature of the hypostatic union.
So Jesus was just a man and not God since his body was a man and not God. Thinking he is God defies the senses and means he’s God only in make believe land. 😂🤣😂 If we were to apply your fraud logic to other applications of divinity Silly parasite 😂🤣😂
1
44
Ain’t eisegesis grand.
It’s as if they skip over scripture that doesn’t agree with their theology.
7
There’s the Jewish Apocrypha and the Christian Apocrypha. These are not the same things.
The apocrypha is the writings of Christians. It’s just not God breathed. It’s not satanic
1
16
Having interacted with Soccinians, see many of the same linguistic errors that they use in this argument.
This Post is from an account that no longer exists. Learn more
9
It’s weird how they stop in the 11th century.
The farther back you walk through Christian history…… The more Catholic it starts to look. 💧
1
32