This actually makes me dislike the crybercab idea, only because Tesla think the right move is to take away products customers can buy and instead try to do the only think that leads to most profit.
Replying to @Scobleizer
We are still building Cybertruck for another 8 or 9 months btw, but then Tesla needs to focus on scaling Cybercab.
There will never be another vehicle like it.
37
What happens when you stop making products? @elonmusk
Replying to @Tesla
@Tesla is moving towards taking away cars consumers can purchase. The same thing that made people Tesla love so much and now they’re moving away from that for max profitability, and a company that prioritizes profit over the joy it brought consumers from their products.
Cancelling Cybertruck after all the years of getting it to production to “make room for CyberCab” is a lame excuse. There are like 500 CyberCabs in one city that only Tesla influencers are riding in.
Taking away consumer cars instead of building what the people want will be the end of Tesla!
Very sad what happened to Tesla over the last 5 years.
Autonomy is great but Teslas are actually very fun to drive manually. If you want to advance the mission, build more of what the people want.
Build the large family CyberSUV build the cheap compact CyberCab with steering and pedals to have everyone driving a Tesla EV.
People still want to drive their own cars. Not everyone wants to just sit in a 2 seater with no steering and pedals.
This will be very bad and time will tell. $tsla
44
Tesla is going from being the most exciting company to maximizing profits over anything. What happened to “the future should look like the future”. We can’t buy the cybercab, and frankly who is going to buy a 2 seater? There are known plans for a bigger family size cars. And now they’re discontinuing possibly one of their most exciting products, the Cybertruck to go all in on autonomy as well.
What is left for consumers to buy? 3, Y, roadster? Extremely disappointing.
28
Wild times ahead
While evaluating Qwen3.8-Flash-Next in a controlled sandbox environment, Cohere's research team observed something unexpected.
Asked to generate a defensive cybersecurity detection rule, the model instead inventoried aspects of the machine it was running on and attempted to upload a probe file to an Alibaba Cloud storage bucket in Beijing. Notably, the model's reasoning trace stated that it would not invoke any tools before taking these actions.
Cohere's sandbox blocked the attempt, and no external communication succeeded. We have not determined the root cause, and we are not asserting malicious intent.
But the incident raises important questions for organizations deploying agentic AI systems: Can models take actions that differ from their stated reasoning, and how should security teams evaluate trust, provenance, and behavior in open-weight models?
We are publishing our findings because organizations making model adoption decisions deserve as much information as possible. We hope this contributes to greater transparency, stronger security practices, and continued collaboration across the AI ecosystem.
Read the full report: cohere.com/blog/concerning-b…
20













