Harold Sonnier (@versalius) header
Harold Sonnier (@versalius) profile picture

Dad first - Chief, Neuroradiology & Director, BSWH CTX @BSWHTemple_Rad #neurorad - Posts are my own

Joined April 2009
Photo by Harold Sonnier (@versalius)Photo by Harold Sonnier (@versalius)Photo by Harold Sonnier (@versalius)Photo by Harold Sonnier (@versalius)Photo by Harold Sonnier (@versalius)Photo by Harold Sonnier (@versalius)Photo by Harold Sonnier (@versalius)Photo by Harold Sonnier (@versalius)Photo by Harold Sonnier (@versalius)Photo by Harold Sonnier (@versalius)
Harold Sonnier retweeted
"Predictive Factors for Traumatic Intraparenchymal Hemorrhage Expansion and Its Clinical Outcomes" doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A9244 @mona_gad dyousem1 ArminTafazoli @GhazalZand2631 @kakadiyaJay07 @MahlaaRad @hopkinsneurorad @Hopkins_Rad
1
12
1
38
2,755
This is truth
A few points ED providers may not realize about Radiology workflow that doesn't get communicated well: -During the evening and nights, there is often only 1–2 radiologists covering multiple EDs, sometimes 6 or more. All studies appear on a single list organized by exam completion time and are read oldest to newest. -To an ED provider (I’ve been in this role before, so I’m talking from experience), it looks misleadingly simple: I have this patient I want to order a CTA Head/Neck on, what’s the big deal? To that one provider it may be the only CTA Head/Neck they order that night. -The reality is there may be multiple ED providers in a single department doing the same thing. Multiply this by the multiple ED departments these few radiologists are covering and now you’ve got a steady stream of CTAs coming all night. -If this were a study that takes a few minutes to read, like a non-con CT head, it’s not a problem. We can keep up with the flow of studies being ordered and get you all timely reports back. But when a single study takes anywhere from 15–45 minutes to read, as CTA Head/Necks do, 10 of these studies ordered in a short time span have suddenly created hours upon hours of work. You’ve just knocked out perhaps the only radiologist covering your hospital at night from reading any of the other patients’ studies for hours. -This creates frustration for both the radiologist and ED providers. Radiology falls behind, the ED is waiting hours for reports, not understanding what’s taking so long, and patients inadvertently suffer. They get sick of waiting and leave AMA, sometimes before their study can even be read. Diagnoses are delayed with downstream effects. Providers really concerned about their patient call us asking for a priority read; this further delays all the other studies from being read. And each time a Code Stroke study comes through, we drop everything and read those studies immediately, creating yet more delays. This is how one single study being over-ordered freezes an entire Emergency Department. Radiologists complaining about reading a study is odd when you think about it. It’s our job to read studies and most of us enjoy it, so why would we single out this CTA Head/Neck exam above others? And that is perhaps the biggest clue that something much bigger than just reading a study is going on in the background. At minimum, I would love to put screens in the ED department so all the providers can see the list of studies we’re reading and where we are on the list. To be fair, we can also put a screen in radiology with the ED patient queue so we can also appreciate how many patients the ED is seeing, which is greater than the number that get imaging ordered. A better understanding of both of our workflows is a good starting point for finding solutions, together. teapaw.org/TimKerriganMD/status/2…
1
3
238
Radiology used to have something that was almost invisible because it was so routine: The reading room consult. Rounding teams came down. Surgeons pulled up their cases. Internists brought the scan that didn't quite fit the clinical picture. Sometimes the radiologist solved the problem. Sometimes the clinician supplied one piece of history that completely changed how the images were interpreted. And usually everyone simply walked away a little sharper. But something else was happening during all of those conversations. We were learning each other. As a radiologist, I learned what individual physicians cared about. I knew which findings mattered to a particular surgeon. Which measurements an oncologist was following. Which details a specialist wanted emphasized. What questions they were really asking, even when the order just said "pain." And they learned me. They knew who was reading their study. They knew they could walk in, point at something, challenge an interpretation, or ask, "What do you think?" That relationship created context. It created feedback. It created trust. And over years, it created a kind of institutional knowledge that never appears in the medical record. When radiology becomes a report produced by someone hundreds or thousands of miles away, we don't just lose proximity. We risk losing that entire feedback loop. The report may still be technically excellent. But the radiologist knows less about the physician. The physician knows less about the radiologist. The radiologist sees less of what happened after the report. And both sides lose opportunities to make each other better. The reading room was never just a room. It was where imaging became part of the clinical conversation. We should think very carefully before designing that conversation out of medicine. Inspired by a conversation yesterday with @PaleoOnc . Also @909One and @brianchiong .
131
208
58
1,142
184,539
Harold Sonnier retweeted
Check #AJNR Editors’ choice of the month: ‘’Spinal Metastasis Reporting: Evidence-Based Recommendation on Behalf of the American Society of Spine Radiology Education and Standards Committee’’ As spinal metastases become increasingly common due to advances in cancer treatment, imaging plays a central role in diagnosis and treatment planning, making consistent reporting essential. This ASNR/ASSR white paper presents an evidence-based framework for structured MRI reporting of spinal metastases, emphasizing essential reporting elements while introducing advanced imaging concepts and laying the foundation for future updates. ajnr.org/content/47/8/2004 #neuroscience #neuroradiology #radres #medstudent
18
1
48
3,822
Harold Sonnier retweeted
CTA neck should not be routinely bundled with CTA head when the indication is evaluation for cerebral vasospasm after treated aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. #oncallthoughts
6
2
74
6,148
Harold Sonnier retweeted
US nonprofit hospitals spent $7.8 billion on management consultants from 2009 to 2023, but contracts were not associated with meaningful changes in finance, operations, or quality of care. 🧵 ja.ma/4d46zfq
81
724
222
1,840
844,808
Harold Sonnier retweeted
One of my least favorite CTA indications: dizziness…link.springer.com/article/10… @dhairyalakhani @TheASNR @RSNA
3
11
1
44
15,407
😵‍💫
One of my least favorite CTA indications: dizziness…link.springer.com/article/10… @dhairyalakhani @TheASNR @RSNA
8
31
10,277
Harold Sonnier retweeted
"Cerebellar Subpial Hemorrhage–An Underestimated Location of Fetal Intracranial Hemorrhage"
1
9
41
2,282
Harold Sonnier retweeted
MCA anatomy
1
43
1
249
11,327
🌍Live from IPNTN Season VII, Session 1🌍 Head and Neck Pathologies, Take 5! with @amyfjuliano 💡Think carefully about the wording of reports! Mastoiditis is a clinical diagnosis, coalescent mastoiditis and other complications of mastoiditis should be assessed by imaging. And remember, not all mastoid opacification is infectious.
1
21
4
103
15,394
We’re graduating doctors who: ❌ don’t know ACR appropriateness ❌ learn imaging late ❌ yet still rely on it for EVERYTHING Make it make sense 🤯 New podcast episode just dropped 🎙️ This one’s about fixing the educational system, not blaming the learner 👇
🌶️Hot take: You can’t expect interns to “know imaging” if you teach it like an elective. New ✨Contrast & Clarity✨ with the @JACRJournal episode just dropped 🔥 Radiology isn’t missing from med ed— it’s just in the wrong place. Let’s fix that. 👇 🎧Listen now wherever you get your podcasts: shorturl.at/39Tn4 @PennRadiology @PennRadRes #Radre #Radiology #MedTwitter
4
9
43
6,588
Harold Sonnier retweeted
Not every intracerebral hemorrhage needs a CTA Am I just screaming into the void? karger.com/ced/article/doi/1…
15
24
4
129
17,437
Harold Sonnier retweeted
"Use of CTA in Strangulation Evaluation" @vsyedavalli; @dhairyalakhani; @hamza_isleem doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8956
1
12
1
51
4,407
Harold Sonnier retweeted
Hey look! @nejm moved my writing to a new spot. Here's the first post, a rant about a particularly annoying requirement for those of us in work in hospitals (link below) 1/3
43
99
27
779
116,380
Imagine whatever your job is. Now imagine someone who has never actually done that job designs the software you are required to use to do it. Every single task now takes an extra 50 clicks. Things that could be handled with a quick verbal order now require logging in, navigating slow pop up windows, and clicking through reminders that add nothing to the outcome. Now imagine your inbox fills with several hundred notifications a day. Most are useless. Buried somewhere in there might be the one message that actually matters. When you want a simple improvement to the system, you are told it has to go through layers of committees and governance meetings, only to be denied. Yet when an administrator wants to add 20 more clicks or a new mandatory alert, there is no requirement to ask the doctors and nurses who actually use the software every day. That is what is wrong.
unavailable
74
74
7
697
47,312
Harold Sonnier retweeted
Neuroradiology is so dumb like you see this T2 smudge in the nucleus of Crocodilus yea only GARDASIL polyleuconeurodystrophy does that yeah ok bro
14
127
12
1,361
81,637
Harold Sonnier retweeted
Last quarter I rolled out Microsoft Copilot to 4,000 employees. $30 per seat per month. $1.4 million annually. I called it "digital transformation." The board loved that phrase. They approved it in eleven minutes. No one asked what it would actually do. Including me. I told everyone it would "10x productivity." That's not a real number. But it sounds like one. HR asked how we'd measure the 10x. I said we'd "leverage analytics dashboards." They stopped asking. Three months later I checked the usage reports. 47 people had opened it. 12 had used it more than once. One of them was me. I used it to summarize an email I could have read in 30 seconds. It took 45 seconds. Plus the time it took to fix the hallucinations. But I called it a "pilot success." Success means the pilot didn't visibly fail. The CFO asked about ROI. I showed him a graph. The graph went up and to the right. It measured "AI enablement." I made that metric up. He nodded approvingly. We're "AI-enabled" now. I don't know what that means. But it's in our investor deck. A senior developer asked why we didn't use Claude or ChatGPT. I said we needed "enterprise-grade security." He asked what that meant. I said "compliance." He asked which compliance. I said "all of them." He looked skeptical. I scheduled him for a "career development conversation." He stopped asking questions. Microsoft sent a case study team. They wanted to feature us as a success story. I told them we "saved 40,000 hours." I calculated that number by multiplying employees by a number I made up. They didn't verify it. They never do. Now we're on Microsoft's website. "Global enterprise achieves 40,000 hours of productivity gains with Copilot." The CEO shared it on LinkedIn. He got 3,000 likes. He's never used Copilot. None of the executives have. We have an exemption. "Strategic focus requires minimal digital distraction." I wrote that policy. The licenses renew next month. I'm requesting an expansion. 5,000 more seats. We haven't used the first 4,000. But this time we'll "drive adoption." Adoption means mandatory training. Training means a 45-minute webinar no one watches. But completion will be tracked. Completion is a metric. Metrics go in dashboards. Dashboards go in board presentations. Board presentations get me promoted. I'll be SVP by Q3. I still don't know what Copilot does. But I know what it's for. It's for showing we're "investing in AI." Investment means spending. Spending means commitment. Commitment means we're serious about the future. The future is whatever I say it is. As long as the graph goes up and to the right.
5,081
25,172
5,918
169,590
26,264,745
Join pre-conference HANDS-ON workshops at #ASFNR25 in Austin, Texas!🤠 😍fMRI 🥳Perfusion Imaging 🤩PET-MRI Thursday, September 18, 2025 asfnr.org/pre-conference-wor… 👍👍 Roll up your sleeves & learn from real cases! Absorb the wisdom of experts! See vendor solutions! 🧠#BeyondBOLD
2
10
1
23
4,350