Jewish. Work in social care/mental health. Like cats - all animals really but mostly cats. Hate hypocrisy

London
Joined April 2007
It doesn’t look very fucked, in all honesty. It’s as if all that Palestine flag waving and trashing of Western cities achieved nothing at all. (When you’re actually here, it really emphasises the sheer triviality of the performative nonsense on “Palestine”.)
34
77
3
1,047
22,259
Eric Hoffer wrote this article about Israel almost 60 years go. It reads like it was written yesterday. "The Jews are a peculiar people: things permitted to other nations are forbidden to the Jews. Other nations drive out thousands, even millions of people and there is no refugee problem. Russia did it, Poland and Czechoslovakia did it, Turkey threw out a million Greeks, and Algeria a million Frenchmen. Indonesia threw out heaven knows how many Chinese-and no one says a word about refugees. But in the case of Israel the displaced Arabs have become eternal refugees. Everyone insists that Israel must take back every single Arab. Arnold Toynbee calls the displacement of the Arabs an atrocity greater than any committed by the Nazis. Other nations when victorious on the battlefield dictate peace terms. But when Israel is victorious it must sue for peace. Everyone expects the Jews to be the only real Christians in this world. Other nations when they are defeated survive and recover but should Israel be defeated it would be destroyed. Had Nasser triumphed last June he would have wiped Israel off the map, and no one would have lifted a finger to save the Jews. No commitment to the Jews by any government, including our own, is worth the paper it is written on. There is a cry of outrage all over the world when people die in Vietnam or when two Negroes are executed in Rhodesia. But when Hitler slaughtered Jews no one remonstrated with him. The Swedes, who are ready to break of diplomatic relations with America because of what we do in Vietnam, did not let out a peep when Hitler was slaughtering Jews. They sent Hitler choice iron ore, and ball bearings, and serviced his troop trains to Norway. The Jews are alone in the world. If Israel survives, it will be solely because of Jewish efforts. And Jewish resources. Yet at this moment Israel is our only reliable and unconditional ally. We can rely more on Israel than Israel can rely on us. And one has only to imagine what would have happened last summer had the Arabs and their Russian backers won the war to realize how vital the survival of Israel is to America and the West in general. I have a premonition that will not leave me; as it goes with Israel so will it go with all of us. Should Israel perish the holocaust will be upon us."
128
1,761
111
5,649
154,223
Patrick, the Irish man who told a Jewish woman that he wish Hitler had finished the job, has been convicted of condoning crimes against humanity and of making death threats. Remember all the people here accusing the Jewish victim of using the name Paddy as a slur, well now we know she was telling the truth the whole time. Assuming she was lying in the first place is clear racism against Jews. But unfortunately I highly doubt most of them will be doing any introspection on the matter.
Found guilty of condoning crimes against humanity and making death threats aggravated by their antisemitic nature, the defendant was sentenced to six months' imprisonment (suspended) associationchar.fr/hitler-na…
124
458
36
2,616
154,751
George Orwell on British anti-Semitism: "above a certain intellectual level people are ashamed of being antisemitic and are careful to draw a distinction between ‘antisemitism’ and ‘disliking Jews’."
The revealing admission in @mehdirhasan’s post - which he completely misses, accidentally or not - is that rising anti-Israel hatred fuels rising attacks on Jewish school kids, because they are Jewish.
11
30
193
12,480
Marwan posted this and made the mistake of not mentioning hes Druze, not a Jew, so now hes got a lot of psychosis accusing him of colonising and killing babies. Standard Sunday morning
2
25
1
256
5,391
That the Communist hammer and sickle isn’t commonly regarded as evil and offensive as the Nazi swastika is a failure of education.
“Dear Italian students, who today take to the streets carrying flags with the hammer and sickle and wearing T-shirts emblazoned with ‘CCCP’,” began an open letter in Italian by Lithuanian expat Neringa Budryt. “I would like to ask you a question: do you truly know what the symbols you carry represent? And do you know what would have happened to many of you had you openly demonstrated in countries living under the oppression of communist regimes? Let me tell you something. It is easy to display a red flag when, for you, communism is merely an abstract idea of equality, social justice, and rebellion against the system. It is easy to wear a T-shirt with "CCCP" on it when you have never experienced the reality of a communist regime. We come from that part of Europe where communism was not a T-shirt, a symbol of rebellion, or a romanticized notion of equality. It was the system in which we lived—a system we never chose. We know the history of Soviet repression, Stalinist purges, the Gulags, and mass deportations. Above all, we know the word "Siberia"—a place to which thousands of innocent people were forcibly deported, simply for thinking differently. In Siberia—amidst freezing cold, starvation, and forced labor—many lost their lives; those who survived carried the scars of that experience forever. Entire families were torn apart, and generations were denied the chance to live freely in their own homeland. In the countries of the Soviet bloc, censorship, political police, surveillance, and the suppression of dissent drastically curtailed individual freedoms. We grew up in a system where state control permeated even our daily lives. At school, we were required to wear the red necktie of the "Pioneers." We were monitored; they tracked where we went and even whether we attended church. Even faith—a choice that should belong to an individual’s own conscience—could become a cause for suspicion. We used to celebrate Christmas with our windows blacked out, to ensure no one would see us and report us. Because it was forbidden—just like so many other things: jeans, rock music, and all the symbols of a Western lifestyle. My mother returned from a Soviet labor camp. And do you know what happened to her? She was barred from continuing her education because she had been labeled an enemy of communism. Under a communist regime, you could not protest. You risked arrest, imprisonment, interrogation, persecution—and, in certain historical contexts, even death. In the Soviet Union and other communist regimes, political dissent could cost you your freedom and your life. Demonstrations independent of the authorities were not a guaranteed right; they were often suppressed by force. That is why it strikes me to see young Italians proudly displaying the hammer and sickle—symbols associated with regimes that persecuted and imprisoned millions of people. Today, you are free to take to the streets, shout against the government, criticize institutions, and wave your flags precisely because you live in a democracy that grants you these freedoms. Under an authoritarian regime of that kind, protesting against those in power could have landed you in prison. This is not about denying the existence of social injustices, inequalities, or the right to fight for a better world. You are free to take to the streets to demand a more just society—but you should not idealize a system that denied so many people the very things you are free to exercise today: the right to choose, to believe, to speak, and to dissent. Before wearing a T-shirt with "CCCP" on it, listen to those who experienced that world. Talk to the deportees and their descendants; read the accounts of those who endured the gulags and forced exile to Siberia. Learn what it meant to be stripped of your freedom, your home, your loved ones—and even any prospect of a normal life—simply because of your background or your beliefs. Before waving the hammer and sickle, please, study history thoroughly.”
300
3,010
151
15,233
238,842
They’ll tell you that they’re interested in justice. They’ll tell you that they’re on the right side of history. And they’ll tell you that they’re humanitarians. But just look at the responses to a 17-year-old Israeli football player. It’s barefaced, unadulterated racism.
🚨🎖| 𝐉𝐔𝐒𝐓 𝐈𝐍: Orian Goren COULD be included in Barça’s squad for El Clásico. [@scapde_45] #fcblive
2
16
114
1,907
One thing I've noticed as a result of being Jewish but not looking like a stereotype, is with a lot of bigotry, you often need a visible minority to catalyse its exposure. When I had Nazi salutes made at me, those children weren't saluting at their other teachers, no one else decorated their classroom for Hanukkah and came back to find their Menorasaurus smashed, so until Little Miss Jew over here rocked up, there was no visible problem - so no one knew the problem was there. Also, I'd hazard a guess that OP has seen and heard [of] instances of antisemitism, she just didn't notice they were antisemitic, either because she low-key agrees or doesn't even realise what an antisemitic microaggression would look like.
12
25
1
182
10,911
The most disingenuous left line is "no hierarchy of racism". It's used only about antisemitism and actually mean they want it deprioritised below issues they care about more. Jews are only asking so called "anti-racists" for the same concern they rightly demand for others.
4
46
97
378
209,991
The absolute paranoid delusion on display here is breathtaking to behold Believing that Israel is "hostile" to Ireland is absurd. Israel fully recognizes Ireland's right to exist Furthermore, Ireland isn't remotely a campaign issue in Israel's democratic elections; whereas in Ireland, academics & politicians are constantly libeling and slandering the world's only Jewish State, sometimes tripping over one another to see whose words can be the most inflammatory
I wasn't aware that any foreign power is hostile to us. Except maybe Israel. Is 'hostile' defined? Is there a list?
32
19
140
3,362
Here’s something more racist: invading a festival and shooting hundreds of people to death because they’re Jews
What could be more racist and ignorant than smearing people for talking about the ethnic cleansing, apartheid and genocide they've suffered without even bothering to speak to them?
37
134
4
1,371
8,903
You've spent quite a lot of time talking to & having photo ops with the one Holocaust child survivor, Stephen Kapos, you've found who happens to agree with you on the Zionism is Racism motion, Mothin. Have you bothered to meet any of the many Holocaust survivors who disagree?
What could be more racist and ignorant than smearing people for talking about the ethnic cleansing, apartheid and genocide they've suffered without even bothering to speak to them?
17
2
108
2,775
I have to say I find the lefts reaction to the Bell report so predictable it's almost hilarious. While they deny antisemitism is a problem in schools, people close to me are dealing with the realities of one of the most nasty cases of antisemitic bullying I have seen and a school
22
26
3
195
4,056
What exactly is progressive about refusing planning permission for a cheap supermarket during a cost of living crisis?
Planning Application for a Lidl superstore on the London Road, Bath REFUSED
190
522
30
23,890
890,113
Comparing Rooney to Rushdie & writing this about Jones’ relentless verbal assault on the British Jewish community in the same week is a new low for an outlet with an editor who wrote that Britain should support assisted suicide for the elderly as a cost saving measure.
Owen Jones has, for the last three years, revealed himself to be a man who watched a film of Hamas atrocities and complained there wasn't "conclusive" evidence of rape; defended marches on Oct 7; responded to report of antisemitism in our schools with post headlined: "Debunked!"
2
52
1
450
12,383
It’s important to not lose sight of what Mehdi Hasanabi, Barry Baloney, the head of the fucking NEU and Owen Buffer Zone Jones are trying to minimise here. This is a national scandal. An unacceptable situation for British children to be facing. And they’re trying to bury it.
Replying to @daverich1
For example: *every pupil* in a class at a Jewish school visited by the review had personally experienced antisemitism on their journey to or from school. That class is not exceptional. If this was about racist abuse towards black children, Jones would not try to downplay it.
16
170
3
935
24,001
It took me just 3 minutes and 4 seconds to cancel my subscription. Would recommend.
Owen Jones has, for the last three years, revealed himself to be a man of enormous courage, integrity and truthfulness. No one should think for a minute that his relentless defence of Palestinian rights and historical truth is easy or comes without heavy personal costs. Throughout the genocide in Gaza, Jones remained a tireless bur rigorous and supremely decent voice. I suspect part of what initially moved him was the strong displeasure in being treated like an idiot by the official propaganda – a noble motive in itself – but there is no question he has been genuinely touched by the images of suffering arriving daily from Gaza. And yet, how does his intellectual fixation on a battle between left and right help us understand the horrors of Gaza, or move us to stop them? My impression is that the opposite has happened. People look at what is happening in Gaza and ask themselves what a person on the right or on the left should think. In many cases this is ideology. In most, simply careerism and group association. Jones shows how limited the perspective really is. How about, like the author himself, asking how a human being should feel? How about returning to the world of facts and feelings rather than our endless Marvel franchise? newstatesman.com/culture/boo…
12
33
3
482
37,110
A few days ago the New Statesman egregiously compared Sally Rooney (whose own publisher pulled her books from UK bookshelves with her approval) to the plight of Salmon Rushdie (who has a fatwa against him and lost sight an eye when someone attempted to murder him). Now they are describing Owen Jones as a ‘man of enormous courage, integrity, and truthfulness’ the day after he called a government report on antisemitism in British schools a ‘travesty’. Not great.
Owen Jones has, for the last three years, revealed himself to be a man of enormous courage, integrity and truthfulness. No one should think for a minute that his relentless defence of Palestinian rights and historical truth is easy or comes without heavy personal costs. Throughout the genocide in Gaza, Jones remained a tireless bur rigorous and supremely decent voice. I suspect part of what initially moved him was the strong displeasure in being treated like an idiot by the official propaganda – a noble motive in itself – but there is no question he has been genuinely touched by the images of suffering arriving daily from Gaza. And yet, how does his intellectual fixation on a battle between left and right help us understand the horrors of Gaza, or move us to stop them? My impression is that the opposite has happened. People look at what is happening in Gaza and ask themselves what a person on the right or on the left should think. In many cases this is ideology. In most, simply careerism and group association. Jones shows how limited the perspective really is. How about, like the author himself, asking how a human being should feel? How about returning to the world of facts and feelings rather than our endless Marvel franchise? newstatesman.com/culture/boo…
47
109
4
962
19,070
Something is seriously wrong at the New Statesman. Earlier in the week they were universally mocked for an outrageous comparison of Salman Rushdie with Sally Rooney. Today, it looks as if Owen Jones, a hugely discredited grifter, had written this puff piece himself.
Owen Jones has, for the last three years, revealed himself to be a man of enormous courage, integrity and truthfulness. No one should think for a minute that his relentless defence of Palestinian rights and historical truth is easy or comes without heavy personal costs. Throughout the genocide in Gaza, Jones remained a tireless bur rigorous and supremely decent voice. I suspect part of what initially moved him was the strong displeasure in being treated like an idiot by the official propaganda – a noble motive in itself – but there is no question he has been genuinely touched by the images of suffering arriving daily from Gaza. And yet, how does his intellectual fixation on a battle between left and right help us understand the horrors of Gaza, or move us to stop them? My impression is that the opposite has happened. People look at what is happening in Gaza and ask themselves what a person on the right or on the left should think. In many cases this is ideology. In most, simply careerism and group association. Jones shows how limited the perspective really is. How about, like the author himself, asking how a human being should feel? How about returning to the world of facts and feelings rather than our endless Marvel franchise? newstatesman.com/culture/boo…
9
20
1
263
3,717
If you need to see how far the left has fallen into a sewer of antisemitism, just look how they react towards a report written on the antisemitism Jewish schoolchildren experience in British schools. An appalling disgrace that no other community would be expected to tolerate.
72
502
21
2,893
71,032