Victor Fleischer retweeted
Replying to @KFILE
Not endorsing this policy, but shouldn't it be:
REFUND THE POLICE
Victor Fleischer retweeted
Who actually gets rich if Anthropic lists at $2 trillion?
The S-1 filed on Monday lets us answer from the filing itself.
The reported target is $1.5T to $2T, listing the week of November 16. The filing implies about 16.9B fully diluted shares. So $2T works out to roughly $118 a share.
The cap table at $2T:
- $199B for the 7 controlling co-founders, about 10%
- $28B for Ben Mann, if his stake matches theirs
- $100B for the Anthropic Public Benefit Fund, 5%
- $331B in employee options and RSUs, about 17% , That pool covers about 5,300 employees, an average of $62M each.
- But when you joined matters enormously.
The S-1 shows how much equity was granted each year, and at what price. [
Headcount went from about 300 to 500 in late 2023, to 940 at end 2024, to 5,300 now.
Match the two, and here is roughly how many people made what at $2T:
- $110M to $400M each: ~300 to 500 people hired by 2023
- $200M to $300M each: ~440 to 640 hired in 2024
- $70M to $95M each: ~1,360 hired in 2025
- $10M to $20M each: ~3,000 hired in 2026
So about 940 people hired by the end of 2024 average nine figures. Everyone hired since averages eight figures.
The 2024 class is the surprise. That year Anthropic granted 1.28B options at $1.30 a share. At $118, that one year of grants is worth about $133B.
Then there is the tender. In April, holders could sell at $25.91 a share. Investors lined up $6B, but only $4.7B sold.
Weeks later, Series H priced at $58.90 a share. At $2T, the people who held would be up 4.6x. And Dario and Daniela Amodei were among the sellers.
The 7 founders have pledged 80% of their equity to charity. That is about $159B at $2T. But the S-1 says the pledges are not legally binding.
Victor Fleischer retweeted
Everyone: Are you okay
Everyone: You look tired
Everyone: You look upset
Everyone: You look annoyed
Everyone: Are you mad at me
Everyone: What are you mad at
Me: IT’S JUST MY FACE
Victor Fleischer retweeted
Behind closed doors, John Fetterman dodges constituents, alienates fellow Democrats and shows little interest in the work of a senator. wsj.com/politics/policy/john… via @WSJ
Victor Fleischer retweeted
With the caveat that I am not an AI safety person, the HF stuff seems INSANE to me, and given that some people who know about this stuff don’t seem to have particularly changed their views off of it I would very much appreciate one of them walking me through why so I can understand
Victor Fleischer retweeted
One of the worst things you can hear as an introvert is, “Let’s go around the room and introduce ourselves.”
Victor Fleischer retweeted
hamilton wrote 51 op-eds in under a year on a shared burner account to win one policy argument, then died in a beef that escalated from remarks printed in a newspaper. the most influential poster in american history simply could not log off, and the constitution is the result
Victor Fleischer retweeted
It is uncomfortable, but this needs to happen at nearly every university. The bureaucratic bloat is mindblowing.
thecrimson.com/article/2026/…
Victor Fleischer retweeted
Carried Interest has been a talking point in tax policy for at least 20 years. It is often viewed as a loophole that if closed would bring in revenue.
Victor Fleischer retweeted
Whoever decided that a university speaker getting reimbursed for an Uber needs to complete the same supplier onboarding as a firm bidding on a $1M waste disposal contract: please rot in hell, with respect.
Victor Fleischer retweeted
I interviewed 20 senior admins and profs for this story. They painted a similar picture: under Alexander, Mellon became monomaniacally obsessed with social justice, almost exclusively funding work advancing political causes at the expense of more traditional humanities work. 4/
Victor Fleischer retweeted
Some advice for new students entering law school:
find the largest, most aggressive professor, and on the first day of class keep raising your hand to make comments
that will let the other students know not to mess with you
Victor Fleischer retweeted
We estimate the Senate-passed reconciliation bill increases primary deficits by $3.1 trillion over 10 years. The dynamic cost, including changes to the economy, is larger at $3.5 trillion. GDP falls by 0.3 in 10 years and falls by 4.6 in 30 years. budgetmodel.wharton.upenn.ed…
Victor Fleischer retweeted
Joseph Goebbels was a literal Nazi and one of Hitler's closest allies.
To my Republican colleagues, it is probably best not to quote him during a congressional hearing.
Victor Fleischer retweeted
Gratitude & applause to the amazing @lsolum, who has not only done defining work on originalism (& other things), but who also organizes, curates, comments on, improves, & promotes academic work in law. A massive public service, done with unfailing generosity & kindness.
Victor Fleischer retweeted
I totally hear you. But the issue is that it isn't your capital at risk. The reason we have a different rate for capital vs labor is to incentivize people to put up their own capital. To invest in America. For whatever reason, we have decided to tax people's labor at a different, higher rate. Your labor is your labor. Investing other people's money isn't a special form of labor. And getting rid of carried interest doesn't change the incentives for *investors* to put up their money. The only shift would be in the incentive for you to decide to choose a profession managing other people's money. And if you're doing it for the tax break, well, that means the system is rewarding tax arbitrage, not actual investment risk.
Replying to @andrewrsorkin @JTLonsdale
Real estate agents take no risk. Investors can work for years and make nothing because of outside market forces.
Also, inflation eats away at capital locked up over time. “Labor” is an immediate payout.
We need to incentivize risk taking and long time horizons.
Victor Fleischer retweeted
Hey, @TheAALS, y'all should figure out how to give @lsolum an award for all that he has done for the legal academy through his remarkable legal theory blog. @BrianLeiter @dorfonlaw























