vladm retweeted
BREAKING: President Trump is expected to sign an Executive Order directing all federal agencies to combat antisemitism, including deporting anti-Jewish activists who violate U.S. laws, as well as students with study visas who break laws during anti-Israel protests.
This is HUGE.
vladm retweeted
I got lots of misinformed comments from my last post. I presumed a basic familiarity with the history of the region. So back to basics:
1) There has never been a country called Palestine.
2) There was a land mass named Palestine whose contours were framed after World War I based upon negotiations among the U.K., France and Saudi Arabia.
3) âPalestineâ had no recognized borders prior to the end of World War I. It was ruled over by the Ottoman Empire for some 400 years. Jews and Arabs both lived there â neither with sovereignty over the land.
4) The San Remo Declaration in 1920 â an outgrowth of the League of Nations formed at the end of the War â designated Palestine as a national homeland for the Jewish People. No other people holds such a designation.
5) Nonetheless, 72% of Palestine was peeled off by the British (as trustee of Mandatory Palestine) as a home for Palestinian Arabs. It initially was called Trans Jordan (being the land on the eastern side of the Jordan River) and later just Jordan. This became the home for Palestinian Arabs, although the Brits installed a Hashemite King.
6) The remaining 28% of Palestine was what was left as a homeland for the Palestinian Jews.
So, as I said earlier, Jordan is Arab Palestine and the homeland for most Palestinian Arabs. The Land of Israel â much smaller in size â is the homeland for Palestinian Jews.
Those now seeking a second Palestinian state within Israel are seeking destruction of the Jewish State. Nothing more or less.
vladm retweeted
Rejecting President Trumpâs request that Jordan absorb Gaza refugees, Jordanâs foreign minister claims that âJordan is for Jordanians and Palestine is for Palestinians.â
Only one problem with that logic: Jordan IS Palestine. It was formed from 72% of the land constituting Mandatory Palestine and most of its people are Palestinians.
Of course Jordanâs King Abdullah remembers well that his grandfather was assassinated by Palestinian terrorists. That might have something to do with his position.
vladm retweeted
It was astonishing how insanely hard legacy media tried to cancel me for saying âmy heart goes out to youâ and moving my hand from my heart to the audience.
In the end, this deception will just be another nail in the coffin of legacy media.
NAZI SALUTE? Wait so this is a thing? Will @EmmanuelMacron resign after giving a Nazi salute or is this just the way people engage large crowds when they are excited? And it has NOTHING to do with Nazis? Anyone who thinks Elon gave a Nazi salute is being disingenuous.
h/t @DrEliDavid
vladm retweeted
In honor of Facebook ending its fact-checking partnerships, here are the funniest fact-checks of Babylon Bee jokes:
A running đ§”:
vladm retweeted
I wasn't going to post about Carter, but seeing dozens of articles proclaiming him a hero and a peacemaker has compelled me to speak up.
Carter might have done more damage to Israel's security and international standing than any Western leader in history.
Let's dive in. đ§”
1/
vladm retweeted
Why not mention WHY the victim was shot (because he was Jewish)? Why not mention WHERE the victim was shot (en route to a synagogue)?
Any Mayor who cannot be bothered to acknowledge the antisemitism of a hate crime against a Jewish man heading to a synagogue is unworthy of the office he holds. An act of hate against the Jewish community is an act of hate against us all.
vladm retweeted
Incredible. I spoke too soon about @60Minutes. Also note how many breaks there are in her answers in the âfullâ version of her interview.
vladm retweeted
It has been 50 days since Kamala Harris became the presumptive nominee of the Democratic Party.
In the dead of night yesterday, she finally released her campaign policy page. Here's what I think of it đ§”
vladm retweeted
This is the final straw.
Because of this law and the many others that preceded it, attacking both families and companies, SpaceX will now move its HQ from Hawthorne, California, to Starbase, Texas.
vladm retweeted
America This Week Livestream from RNC Now xitter.cf/i/broadcasts/1dRJZdzwAâŠ
vladm retweeted
I agree with most but not all of @DavidSacks considerations for why he is voting for @realDonaldTrump. An important read.
Why Iâm Backing President Trump
As many press accounts have reported, Iâm hosting a fundraising event for President Donald J. Trump at my home in San Francisco this evening.
Over the last couple of years, I have hosted events for presidential candidates Ron DeSantis, Vivek Ramaswamy, and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., as well as several Congressional figures in both major parties. I give to many, but endorse few.
But today I am giving my endorsement to our 45th President, Donald J. Trump, to be our 47th President. My reasons rest on four main issues that I think are vital to American prosperity, security, and stability â issues where the Biden administration has veered badly off course and where I believe President Trump can lead us back.
1. The Economy
President Biden took over an economy that was already recovering strongly from the Covid-induced shock of Q2 2020. Demand had roared back, and employment had recovered. But he chose to keep priming the pump with unnecessary Covid stimulus â almost $2 trillion of it, passed on a straight party-line vote in March of 2021, with trillions more to follow for âinfrastructure,â green energy, and âinflation reduction.â
Biden did this despite early warnings from former Clinton Treasury Secretary Larry Summers that it could lead to inflation. When the inflation came, the Biden administration dismissed it as âtransitory.â In fact, inflation still remains persistently high even after the fastest interest-rate tightening cycle in memory.
As a result of Bidenâs inflation, average Americans have lost roughly a fifth of their purchasing power over the last few years. Moreover, any American who needs a mortgage, car loan, or credit card debt faces much higher interest costs, which further constrain their purchasing power.
Itâs no different for our federal government, which now must devote over a trillion dollars annually to interest on its $34 trillion debt, a massive sum thatâs been growing by a trillion dollars every hundred days. This trajectory is unsustainable, yet Bidenâs 2025 budget calls for even higher spending.
Growth has already slowed from 3.4 percent in the last quarter of 2023 to an anemic 1.3 percent in the first quarter of this year. We canât afford another four years of Bidenomics.
2. Foreign Policy / Ukraine War
President Trump left office with ISIS defeated, the Abraham Accords signed, and no new wars raging on the global stage. Three and a half years later, the world is on fire. President Biden has made several strategic choices that have contributed to this situation.
In his first year in office, Biden unnecessarily alienated the Saudis before realizing that they are an indispensable partner in the Middle East. He also presided over a chaotic withdrawal of our troops from Afghanistan (right policy, abysmal execution).
But his biggest blunder by far has been in Ukraine. His administration immediately began pushing for Ukraineâs admission to NATO, despite no unanimity among the existing NATO members that such a move was a good idea. When this predictably antagonized the Russians, the Biden administration doubled down at every turn, insisting that âNATOâs door is open, and will remain openâ with respect to Ukraine. Biden himself baited Russia when he said he didnât âaccept anybodyâs red lines.â
After the invasion, there was still a chance to stop the war in its early weeks before much loss of life and destruction had occurred. Russian and Ukrainian negotiators had signed a draft agreement in Istanbul that would have seen Russia retreat to its pre-invasion borders in exchange for Ukrainian neutrality. But the Biden administration rejected that deal as well as General Milleyâs advice to seek a diplomatic solution in November 2022.
As the war of attrition grinds on, the Ukrainians face ever-mounting casualties and infrastructure damage. Still, President Biden keeps allowing the conflict to escalate and risk World War III. Every escalation that Biden initially resisted â Abrams tanks, F-16âs, ATACMs, allowing Ukraine to hit targets in Russia â he has eventually acquiesced to. There is just one more escalation to go: NATO troops on the ground fighting Russia directly. And our European allies like Emmanuel Macron are already spoiling for exactly this scenario.
With Biden, our choices are limited to fighting the proxy war to the last Ukrainian, or fighting Russia ourselves. President Trump has said he wants the dying in Ukraine to stop, and that he will seek to end the war through a negotiated settlement. Ukraine will no longer be able to get the deal we talked them out of in April 2022, but we can still save Ukraine as an independent nation and avert world war.
3. The Border
As an immigrant to the United States myself, I certainly believe in Americaâs history of strengthening its ranks by welcoming talented people from other nations seeking freedom and opportunity. But that promise requires an orderly process of legal immigration that emphasizes skills and the principles of American citizenship. This was the preferred policy under President Trump.
What Biden ushered in was a de facto open border policy. On his first day in office, he repealed President Trumpâs executive orders restricting illegal immigration and stopped construction of a border wall, selling off parts of it for scrap metal. This quickly resulted in a massive spike in illegal border crossings and a chaotic and dangerous situation on our southern border.
President Biden (along with the hapless Kamala Harris and the malevolent Homeland Security Chief Alejandro Mayorkas) responded to growing concerns by gaslighting the American public, saying there was no problem at the border despite constant videos of masses of people sprinting across it.
When the situation became too dire to ignore or deny, Biden claimed he didnât have the executive authority to do anything about it and blamed Republicans for not sending him legislation. But this week, facing abysmal polling numbers on this issue, Biden suddenly discovered he has executive authority after all. The order he signed is a tepid, too little-too late effort to slow the tidal wave of illegal immigration in time for the election. But Biden has shown he is not serious on this issue. If he wins a second term, the open border policy will resume, and tens of millions more illegals will stream across the border.
4. Lawfare
A bedrock of the political stability weâve enjoyed in America over the last 250 years is that we donât accept attempts to jail political opponents in order to win an election. Yet Biden has pushed for selective and unprecedented prosecutions of his once and future opponent from the moment he assumed office.
Merrick Garland took a long look at the January 6 situation and didnât see a path to prosecute Trump, even after a one-sided Congressional committee sent a highly-prejudiced referral to his Justice Department. Press stories then appeared describing Bidenâs frustration with Garlandâs reticence. The result was Jack Smith at the federal level and Alvin Bragg and Fani Willis at the state level. All have pursued cases based on novel legal theories heretofore unseen and designed to get Trump. In the NY case, Bragg resurrected a dead book-keeping misdemeanor into 34 felonies by claiming it was in the service of a second crime that he never defined and that the judge never insisted the jury unanimously agree on.
My immigration to this country as a young boy happened because my parents disagreed with the political system of their home country. That government sought to solve its political disagreements by imprisoning its political enemies. What a sad irony that the lawfare we escaped has now reared its ugly head in America of all places.
President Biden keeps insisting that a return of President Trump to the White House threatens democracy. But his administration is the one that has colluded with tech platforms to censor the Internet, used the intelligence community to cover up his son Hunterâs laptop, and pursued elective prosecutions against his political opponents.
Conclusion: The A/B Test
The voters have experienced four years of President Trump and four years of President Biden. In tech, we call this an A/B test. With respect to economic policy, foreign policy, border policy, and legal fairness, Trump performed better. He is the President who deserves a second term.
vladm retweeted
Ever since Donald Trump emerged as a presidential contender nine years ago, Americaâs most esteemed scholars and journalists have argued that he was violating democratic norms. Trump, they said, was ignoring the stabilizing, unwritten rules and values of American politics. This was evident in his vulgar language, vilification of immigrants, criticisms of the press, lack of cooperation with the intelligence community, and refusal to accept the 2020 election results.
But the Democratsâ relentless effort to imprison Trump has undermined the rule of law, faith in the criminal justice system, and democratic norms more than anything Trump has ever done.
According to multiple credible sources, President Barack Obamaâs Director of the CIA, in the summer of 2016, illegally mobilized foreign spy agencies to target 26 Trump advisors to claim, falsely, that Russian dictator Vladimir Putin controlled Trump.
Then, in January 2017, after Trump had been elected but before he took office, the U.S. Intelligence Community falsely claimedthat Putin had favored the election of Trump when, in reality, the intelligence showed that Putin favored Hillary Clinton.
After taking office, current and former US government intelligence operatives and Democrats falsely claimed that Russian disinformation on social media had resulted in Trumpâs election and worked with the Department of Homeland Security to censor social media platforms.
None of this is a defense of Trump. He uses extreme and inflammatory rhetoric, particularly about immigrants, that I strongly disagree with. He was wrong to deny and try to change the results of the 2020 elections. And I think people are right to fear that, if he were re-elected, he could weaponize the government to exact revenge on his political enemies.
But that fear is further proof of the danger of Democrats weaponizing the government. Democrats went far beyond anything Trump did when it came to abusing their political power. After the Supreme Court ruled that Biden could not legally forgive student loans, he did so anyway. By contrast, Trump did not violate any Supreme Court rulings.
Itâs true that Trump has criticized judges, journalists, and intelligence agencies, but why is that a bad thing? We have a separation of powers for a reason.
As for the intelligence agencies, they broke the law multiple times in targeting Trump. As for the news media, they deserve criticism for losing the publicâs trust after lying about everything from the origins of Covid to the efficacy of the Covid vaccine to the Russiagate hoax.
Or consider the prosecution of Trump for supposedly taking and holding onto classified documents. Itâs not obvious that Trump put national security in greater danger than Biden. There is evidence that the Biden administration worked with the National Archives and Department of Justice to demand the confrontation. And there is the possibility that the raid was motivated in order to recover documents related to the Russiagate hoax.
And the abuse of the court system by Democrats in an effort to incarcerate Trump and keep him off the ballot is far more of a violation of norms than anything Trump ever dreamed of.
The recent felony conviction of Trump for falsifying business records relies on the idea that he misclassified campaign payments. Democrats say, âNobody is above the law,â which is true. But Democrats are wrong to ignore the fact that prosecutors are constantly making choices about whether to pursue certain cases over others. Indeed, Hillary Clinton was found to have mislabeled payments related to the Steele dossier during her 2016 campaign, and she was never prosecuted. The Federal Election Commission (FEC) merely fined Clinton and the Democratic National Convention (DNC)) for this misconduct.
In fact, everything about New York District Attorney Alvin Braggâs recent conviction of Trump is abnormal. For starters, Bragg campaigned on the promise to prosecute Trump. He turned the misdemeanor of falsifying business records into a felony by tying it to election interference. The case was so weak that both the Department of Justice and the former DA refused to prosecute it.
The judge in the case donated to Biden and his daughter is the president of a Democratic Party fundraising firm whose clients include Rep. Adam Schiff, who led the Russiagate hoax. The judge told the jurors that they didnât need to agree on what crime Trump intended to commit by falsifying records.
The case confused even legal experts. âAt the start of closing arguments,â wrote legal scholar Jonathan Turley, âmost honest observers were still wondering what the prosecutors were alleging as to the crime that Trump was allegedly concealing with the falsification of business records.â
Even CNNâs top legal scholar, Elie Honig, who is also a former colleague of Bragg, said the trial violated norms. âProsecutors Got Trump But They Contorted the Law,â explained Honig in New York Magazine. âThe charges against Trump are obscure and nearly entirely unprecedented,â he said. âIn fact, no state prosecutorâ in New York, or Wyoming, or anywhere â has ever charged federal election laws as a direct or predicate state crime against anyone for anything. None. Ever.â
All of this is a radical change from the ideals of the Democratic Party just a few years ago. In the 1970s and 1980s, Democrats fought to restrict and reform the intelligence community so that it would stop spying on American citizens for their political activities. Democrats defended a high standard for free speech, including the right of Nazis to march through neighborhoods of Holocaust survivors. And since the 1990s, Democrats have raised the alarm about the abuse of prosecutorial power and elected progressive prosecutors, including Bragg, to reduce prosecutions of nonviolent crimes.
Today, Democrats are pioneering new ways to weaponize the government....
vladm retweeted
TWITTER FILES - CIA
The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) is the most famous of the 18 US government agencies that comprise the Intelligence Community (IC) of the United States of America. Unlike the Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI), the law strictly prohibits CIA employees or contractors from spying upon or running clandestine operations against American citizens on US soil.
But now, a new Twitter Files investigation reveals that a member of the Board of Trustees of the CIAâs mission-driven venture capital firm and ostensibly âformerâ IC and CIA analysts were involved in a 2021-2022 effort to take over Twitterâs content management system.
The effort also involved:
â a long-time IC contractor and senior Department of Defense R&D official who spent years developing technologies to detect whistleblowers (âinsider threatsâ) like Edward Snowden and Wikileaksâ leakers;
â the proposed head of the DHSâ aborted Disinformation Governance Board, Nina Jankowicz, who aided US military and NATO âhybrid warâ operations in Europe;
â Jim Baker, who, as FBI General Counsel, helped start the Russiagate hoax, and, as Twitterâs Deputy General Counsel, urged Twitter executives to censor The New York Post story about Hunter Biden.
xitter.cf/shellenberger/status/1âŠ
These existing or former IC employees, contractors, or intermediaries werenât satisfied with simply controlling Twitter. They also wanted to use PayPal, Amazon Web Services, and GoDaddy in a totalizing effort to de-platform, de-monetize, and excommunicate from the Internet entirely those individuals that the IC et al. deems to be a threat.
There is much that we still do not know about the effort. We do not know if officials within the CIA or any other IC organization ran the operation. It is possible that the only individuals involved in the effort were the ones we discovered. And none of the individuals involved responded to our request for information except for one.
But thousands of pages of Twitter Files and documents contained therein paint a clear picture of an organized operation by existing or former IC employees and contractors, using well-established IC tradecraft, to take control of Twitterâs content moderation.
Our investigation comes at a moment when governments and intelligence agencies around the world are stepping up their efforts to monitor and censor their citizens. It thus has large implications for policymakers and the public in Western nations that look to the US as a model for free speech and citizen control of the military.
This is a joint Public-Racket investigation. The authors are @Shellenberger @MTaibbi and @GalexyBrane. As always, the only condition we agreed to in publishing this was to first publish on X. At the end of this thread, we explain why and how this investigation began.
Here we go...
Replying to @shellenberger
35. In response to Roth, Baker repeatedly insists that the Hunter Biden materials were either faked, hacked, or both, and a violation of Twitter policy. Baker does so over email, and in a Google doc, on October 14 and 15.
vladm retweeted
I hope all of those who have publicly downplayed this barbarism or have fallen silent in the face of it will read this piece and share it:
nytimes.com/2023/12/28/worldâŠ






























