Gordon Berry (@wealthagent) header
Gordon Berry (@wealthagent) profile picture

Business Adviser. Chartered Certified Accountant and Chartered Tax Adviser. NLP Master Practitioner.

Scotland
Joined May 2011
Photo by Gordon Berry (@wealthagent)Photo by Gordon Berry (@wealthagent)Photo by Gordon Berry (@wealthagent)Photo by Gordon Berry (@wealthagent)Photo by Gordon Berry (@wealthagent)Photo by Gordon Berry (@wealthagent)Photo by Gordon Berry (@wealthagent)Photo by Gordon Berry (@wealthagent)Photo by Gordon Berry (@wealthagent)Photo by Gordon Berry (@wealthagent)
The McCann Review is outrageous. 1. It rewards ONLY people who didn't comply with the #loancharge settlement deadline. 2. It rewards ONLY people who did tax strategies after the law allegedly became clear. Had it applied on equal terms to ALL loans THEN it might have been "fair".
1
4
327
Gordon Berry retweeted
🚨NEW: Hundreds of civil servants have been caught working multiple jobs [@Telegraph]
195
425
139
3,329
496,006
LCAG helped them take money from people they call “victims”. Last I heard the WTT Big group joining fee was £6k
I know of only one company who has quite literally made £millions out of #loancharge victims & they’ve taken that money SINCE 2016 Because LCAG keep promoting them! WTF
1
268
You received the untaxed loans! Employers would be taxed on what they received. If employers paid your tax then they have a right of restitution against you. How can Directors of LCAG still be arguing the same wrong things 10 years down the line! 🤦‍♂️ #loancharge
197
The Tories are living a life of luxury at your expense. Rishi Sunak has failed to rein in this culture of lavish spending. 💳 Labour will get tough on waste, with an Office of Value for Money to ensure transparency and proper controls. 🧮
3,721
1,260
349
8,114
1,360,820
I do understand that it must be really tough realising that a small number of individuals who ran LCAG made the decision for you back in 2020 that they’d pass up the ideal opportunity for better settlement terms, cause they decided you were “in it for the long run” per S Packham
I know of only one company who has quite literally made £millions out of #loancharge victims & they’ve taken that money SINCE 2016 Because LCAG keep promoting them! WTF
1
183
I know of only one company who has quite literally made £millions out of #loancharge victims & they’ve taken that money SINCE 2016 Because LCAG keep promoting them! WTF
1
1
1
1
709
From October 2020👇
Nobody's ever seen any litigation forthcoming in regard to post DR cases open cases so no idea how anyone plans to get around LC being law. I'd be asking to see Counsel opinion on likely success. Meanwhile the challenges to the #loancharge is no help to those with open enquiries.
96
Gordon Berry retweeted
The CEOs were also reminded by GMB union of its right to invite all staff to online meetings conducted during working hours, and for which workers will be paid while attending The email said they must distribute the union’s correspondence to their staff “within two working days of receiving it, in full and unedited, as a standalone item and not bundled into other updates” Story: thetimes.com/business/compan…
13
23
3
206
102,062
Gordon Berry retweeted
🚨 NEW: One of Britain's biggest unions emailed thousands of CEOs demanding to “recruit” workers just 3 minutes after the new workers' rights laws took effect The law allows unions to request workplace access and contact all workers, whether they're union members or not
86
197
43
2,788
582,932
These are the SNP MSPs voting themselves a £20,000 payrise as committe conveners: Stuart McMillan David Linden Calum Kerr Karen Adam Katie Hagmann Clare Haughey Bob Doris Jenni Minto
71
312
16
673
51,041
This is so typical of the vague BS that comes from LCAG directors. What exactly does “approved by the establishment” mean? A vague claim with zero evidence to support it. Yet these are the same LCAG directors who are misleading the APPG behind closed doors & writing articles.
118
Gordon Berry retweeted
Replying to @sonicrodjerk
Does it get any more deceitful than this: Acting as APPG secretariat. To blame Promoters. While trying to sue his accountant. For a scheme he chose to enter as a Chartered Accountant. Yet argues tax isn’t due. And doesn’t declare #loancharge liabilities on his 2019 Tax Return.
1
1
85
Gordon Berry retweeted
Ironically, having claimed he was misled into tax avoidance, Dick, a Chartered Accountant, advised others not to declare the loan write-off mis-advised by WTT in 2017 & then years later he took WTT’s ‘advice’ not to disclose his #Loancharge liabilities on 2019 Tax Return! 💰 🤥
1
96
Gordon Berry retweeted
Replying to @sonicrodjerk
Dick is a Chartered (Management) Accountant. He either signed a NMW contract & loan agreement or claimed to be self-employed & his tax adviser (WTT) now tell him to argue that was a false declaration! But it’s all someone else’s fault as Dick didn’t know what those terms meant 🤥
2
1
131
Dick’s accountants tried to get 85% into his hands via tax scheme per the case law at the time. Dick wants his accountant sued & prosecuted! His new agents WTT tell him to argue tax was never due & to not declare his liabilities even though the #loancharge very clearly applies!
2
348
Dick knows the #loancharge exists. He knows it is retrospective. Remarkably he wanted legal action again his previous agent & yet laps up the WTT sales pitch. Dick was the acting APPG secretariat. How many times were WTT invited to APPG meetings to sell crap behind closed doors.
74
Gordon Berry retweeted
HMRC duped Parliament. In September 2015, before the 2017 Supreme Court ruling, HMRC proposed a retrospective income tax that nobody was meant to pay, it was just meant to pressure everyone into settlement whether HMRC could tax them or not. Then LCAG blamed the Promoters 🙄
1
66
Unions gaslighting taxpayers.
🚨PCS PRESS RELEASE: Scottish Government workers to be balloted for industrial action over hybrid working PCS members across the Scottish Government and 4 other employers are to be balloted for industrial action in a dispute over plans to enforce office attendance with punitive measures and undermine already-agreed flexible working arrangements. The ballot will involve members working in the Scottish Government, Social Security Scotland, Community Justice Scotland, Transport Scotland and Disclosure Scotland, amid growing opposition to the imposition of mandatory office attendance targets. The Scottish Government has introduced a requirement for staff to spend at least 40% of their working time in the office, with the threat of disciplinary action for those who fail to comply. PCS believes the move represents a significant attack on previously agreed hybrid working arrangements, replacing a job-based approach with an entirely arbitrary attendance target. The union argues that the Scottish Government has failed to demonstrate how compulsory office attendance will improve the delivery of public services and is instead pursuing a policy that risks damaging staff morale, work-life balance and the progress made towards a more inclusive workforce. The dispute also raises concerns about the wider future of hybrid working across the Scottish Government and its executive agencies, several of which already enforce office attendance requirements. PCS is calling on the Scottish Government to reverse the new mandatory targets and rule out the use of office attendance as a measure of individual performance or as grounds for disciplinary action. The union is also seeking a consistent and fair approach to hybrid working across the Scottish Government and its agencies, recognising that some roles require a physical presence while protecting flexibility for staff, including those working in rural and dispersed locations. The decision to move to a statutory ballot follows a consultative ballot in 2025, in which 70% of participating PCS members backed industrial action over hybrid working. PCS maintains that decisions about where staff work should be driven by operational needs and the effective delivery of public services, not rigid attendance quotas. The union remains committed to securing a negotiated resolution that protects members' terms and conditions and preserves the benefits of flexible working. Ruby Gibson, PCS national officer for Scotland, said: ‘The Scottish Government has provided no convincing evidence that forcing staff back into the office for at least 40% of their working time will improve public services, productivity, or outcomes for the people of Scotland. Instead, the Permanent Secretary and employers have chosen to impose an arbitrary target and threaten disciplinary action against workers who do not comply.’ ‘This is an unacceptable way to treat the people who helped keep Scotland's public services running through the Covid-19 pandemic and have continued to deliver vital services in challenging circumstances ever since.’ ‘The pandemic demonstrated what civil servants and their employers already knew: that public services can be delivered effectively through flexible and hybrid working. It opened up opportunities for a better work-life balance, improved productivity and a more inclusive workforce, including for disabled workers, carers and those living in rural and remote communities.’ ‘Rather than building on those gains, the Scottish Government is determined to turn the clock back. It is replacing trust with surveillance, flexibility with rigid targets and constructive employment relations with the threat of disciplinary action.’ ‘This is not about opposing office working. It is about ensuring that working arrangements are determined by the needs of the job and the services being delivered, not arbitrary targets imposed without proper evidence or meaningful agreement with staff and their representatives.’ ‘This ballot is about protecting the future of hybrid working across the Scottish Government and its agencies and making clear that PCS members will not simply accept decisions that undermine their working lives. PCS is ready to negotiate a sensible, evidence-based solution, but we will not stand by while hard-won protections are stripped away.’ Notes: The PCS ballot will run from 9 November 2026 until 14 December 2026.
144
The Scottish Government want staff to spend at least 40% of working time in the office, Union argues that the Scottish Government has failed to demonstrate how compulsory office attendance will improve the delivery of public services! Unions taking the piss out of taxpayers.
🚨PCS PRESS RELEASE: Scottish Government workers to be balloted for industrial action over hybrid working PCS members across the Scottish Government and 4 other employers are to be balloted for industrial action in a dispute over plans to enforce office attendance with punitive measures and undermine already-agreed flexible working arrangements. The ballot will involve members working in the Scottish Government, Social Security Scotland, Community Justice Scotland, Transport Scotland and Disclosure Scotland, amid growing opposition to the imposition of mandatory office attendance targets. The Scottish Government has introduced a requirement for staff to spend at least 40% of their working time in the office, with the threat of disciplinary action for those who fail to comply. PCS believes the move represents a significant attack on previously agreed hybrid working arrangements, replacing a job-based approach with an entirely arbitrary attendance target. The union argues that the Scottish Government has failed to demonstrate how compulsory office attendance will improve the delivery of public services and is instead pursuing a policy that risks damaging staff morale, work-life balance and the progress made towards a more inclusive workforce. The dispute also raises concerns about the wider future of hybrid working across the Scottish Government and its executive agencies, several of which already enforce office attendance requirements. PCS is calling on the Scottish Government to reverse the new mandatory targets and rule out the use of office attendance as a measure of individual performance or as grounds for disciplinary action. The union is also seeking a consistent and fair approach to hybrid working across the Scottish Government and its agencies, recognising that some roles require a physical presence while protecting flexibility for staff, including those working in rural and dispersed locations. The decision to move to a statutory ballot follows a consultative ballot in 2025, in which 70% of participating PCS members backed industrial action over hybrid working. PCS maintains that decisions about where staff work should be driven by operational needs and the effective delivery of public services, not rigid attendance quotas. The union remains committed to securing a negotiated resolution that protects members' terms and conditions and preserves the benefits of flexible working. Ruby Gibson, PCS national officer for Scotland, said: ‘The Scottish Government has provided no convincing evidence that forcing staff back into the office for at least 40% of their working time will improve public services, productivity, or outcomes for the people of Scotland. Instead, the Permanent Secretary and employers have chosen to impose an arbitrary target and threaten disciplinary action against workers who do not comply.’ ‘This is an unacceptable way to treat the people who helped keep Scotland's public services running through the Covid-19 pandemic and have continued to deliver vital services in challenging circumstances ever since.’ ‘The pandemic demonstrated what civil servants and their employers already knew: that public services can be delivered effectively through flexible and hybrid working. It opened up opportunities for a better work-life balance, improved productivity and a more inclusive workforce, including for disabled workers, carers and those living in rural and remote communities.’ ‘Rather than building on those gains, the Scottish Government is determined to turn the clock back. It is replacing trust with surveillance, flexibility with rigid targets and constructive employment relations with the threat of disciplinary action.’ ‘This is not about opposing office working. It is about ensuring that working arrangements are determined by the needs of the job and the services being delivered, not arbitrary targets imposed without proper evidence or meaningful agreement with staff and their representatives.’ ‘This ballot is about protecting the future of hybrid working across the Scottish Government and its agencies and making clear that PCS members will not simply accept decisions that undermine their working lives. PCS is ready to negotiate a sensible, evidence-based solution, but we will not stand by while hard-won protections are stripped away.’ Notes: The PCS ballot will run from 9 November 2026 until 14 December 2026.
2
204