Thank you James. This is exactly why. People are incredibly simple. This is a great explanation. Too bad it’s over 55 characters so they won’t read it.
Of all the dumb talking points I encounter, and I encounter a lot of them, the New Right (Woke Right) talking point that Iran has been "close to a nuclear weapon for 20 years," implying that's a false pretext and Trump lied, is perhaps the dumbest. Just astronomically fake.
I can't believe Buck Sexton, ex-CIA genius, trotted it out last night, among so many others. There's no way he's this dumb as an analyst, so he must have other motivations for saying it.
Let's explain how stupid it is, though.
Iran wants a nuclear weapon because they're a lunatic terrorist-theocratic regime that's also a threat to everyone around them. That means they're trying to build one, and when they encounter setbacks and obstacles, they will keep trying to build one.
So, if they wanted one 20 years ago and got close and got set back, say by Israeli or American or other intervention, that would be a setback, not a permanent end to the program. After a period of time, they would regroup and get close to a nuclear weapon again. If that gets stopped again, it starts over again too.
This keeps happening until the IRGC is out of power because they can always dig another hole and start again, especially with a little help from their bad-guy friends in Russia, China, and North Korea. So, periodically, as long as the IRGC lasts, it will once again be close to a nuclear weapon and have to be stopped.
It got especially close this time significantly because of a little bit of help from another one of their friends: Barack Obama.
If this is too abstract and complicated for you, consider an analogy.
You really want something, like new shoes or something. You work to get the money to get them, but then when you're close to having enough, something comes up, and you have to spend some of your money. That's a setback, but you keep working because you really want those shoes. Soon, you get close again, but your phone broke, so you have to spend your money to fix it and have to get back to working toward your shoes again later.
Each time, you almost have enough money for your shoes. So, you keep almost having your shoes even though you don't have them yet. But you ain't quit, so you'll keep working to get them, and before you know it, you're close again.
It works just like that. The IRGC really wants nuclear weapons. Israel and America keep stopping them from getting them, and they face setbacks like having their centrifuges blown up. So they get new centrifuges as soon as they can, put them somewhere new, and get back to it. Before long, they're close again because they want it.
Let me try another analogous explanation for the cooked brains out there. Imagine you have an illegal immigrant jihadi cell that wants to do a terrorist attack in New York. They put together a plan, but the cops foil it and arrest some of them. But their parent organization really wants to do it, so they get some more guys and a new plan. The cops foil that too. As long as the parent organization, Muslim Brotherhood or whatever, still operates, the cops keep having to stop imminent terrorist attacks as they find out about them because the organization really wants to do one whether this plan or that plan gets busted or not.
See, they got really close to doing a terror attack but faced a setback, so they regrouped and tried again. Then they got set back again, so they regrouped again. It's just like this. Exactly like this. Not at all different than this.
I can't believe I have to explain this.
I can't believe how fried people's brains are, including smart ex-CIA brains, that they either can't understand this or are willing to pretend they don't understand it for other reasons, publicly, in front of people.
President Trump has never once changed his tune on why he struck Iran, either in June of 2025 or in February of 2026, starting the war: "Iran will never have a nuclear weapon."
The intelligence suggested that they were getting close to it, along with long-range ballistic missiles. The claim was they were close to final enrichment for enough material for up to eleven warheads, and they might have them within two weeks.
Just after Trump struck, they launched some long-range ballistic missiles at Diego Garcia and proved they had those and that intelligence was correct. For some reason, nobody who is "against the war" is willing to believe that the nuclear material claim, which would arm the missiles, which could hit European capitals, was also true.
President Trump has never wavered and is even still doubling down on his reasoning here, which is clear, simple, and to the point. He said it again today, in fact. In all likelihood, it is true, and he did the right thing.
That means he did not start the war. Iran did.
That means the war was not pointless. It was to prevent the successful completion of nuclear weapons.
That means the war that ensued was not pointless either. It is what followed because Iran wasn't happy about it.
That means it wasn't Israel's war. It was humanity's war, and America's war too. Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.
That means Israel didn't drag America into the war. Israel shared intelligence that our own services used and agreed with to inform the strikes.
That means the war is America First, if you must use that insufferable, tainted brand to get your brain to do anything.
That means the right reaction isn't punishing Trump or adopting more New Right crap. It is to say thank you and to be proud to be an American because your country provided an important service.
My frustration with how many people are swallowing this absolutely idiotic New Right, Iranian, Russian propaganda nonsense could not possibly be higher. I cannot believe this has to be explained to people.
Nolen retweeted
How to Woke Right:
Step 1: Spend months attacking virtually every decision President Trump makes, from the war in Iran to his economic policies, telling Americans how badly they're being betrayed and how unaffordable everything has become, without bothering to analyze the data and without making any effort to explain what the administration is actually trying to accomplish or why those decisions were made in the first place.
Step 2: When Republicans lose elections, blame Trump for supposedly ignoring what Americans want, as if your own constant outrage and attacks had absolutely nothing to do with shaping how those voters feel. Forget examining whether the policies were justified, whether they were properly explained, or what alternatives would actually benefit the country.
Step 3: Lecture everyone else about the importance of keeping the Republican Party united. Tell us that criticizing Tucker Carlson is dangerous because he's part of the conservative movement and we cannot afford to divide the right.
Tell us that criticizing Tucker for spreading insane conspiracy theories and promoting everything anti-America is supposedly a threat to conservative unity, while telling Republican voters that their own president has betrayed them for no apparent reason.
Now, I want to be clear about something, because I think this is where the argument often gets lost.
Nobody is obligated to blindly defend Trump or agree with every decision he makes. There are legitimate arguments to be had about the Iran war, its costs, and the administration's economic policies. But if you genuinely care about conservative principles and want Americans to understand what Republicans are trying to accomplish, why wouldn't you at least explain the reasoning behind those decisions?
Do you seriously believe Trump went into office intending to make life more expensive for Americans? Do you think he decided to confront Iran for absolutely no reason? Even if you believe the war was a terrible mistake, is it really that difficult to explain why preventing the Iranian regime from acquiring nuclear weapons would be an important American national security objective, and then make your argument about why his approach was wrong?
Many of these people enthusiastically supported Trump and helped convince Americans to vote for him. Now they spend their time telling those same voters that everything he does is a betrayal, while offering absolutely nothing in the way of serious policy alternatives.
If you believe a policy is wrong, explain why, including what it was intended to accomplish and why your alternative would serve Americans better. But don't spend months encouraging voters to see every difficult decision as proof that their president has abandoned them, and then act surprised when those voters become disillusioned.
Oh and I forgot
step 4) Blame "neocons" or Jews for the loss instead of actually doing a moment of introspection or asking if your "republican" friends telling everyone not to vote may have had something to do with it.
Nolen retweeted
America’s investment boom is ON FIRE.
Investment jumped 12.7%. Equipment investment surged 20.9%.
Investment is the mother’s milk of productivity growth and higher incomes. This is the kind of growth America needs!
Spot on.
The purpose of a Nick Fuentes is transparent when you know what to look for.
His job is to isolate, divide, and mislead.
He presents as not merely opposed to the LGBT nonsense, but ANTI-GAY.
Not just criticizing the excesses of feminism, but provocatively hostile to women.
Not merely concerned about certain aspects of Jewish power, but anti-Semitic.
Not concerned about various problems in black communities, but anti black.
Now, you might bicker on specifics and say he’s not really as bad as I am stating. But the point is he presents as a personae that is perceived as that bad. And that’s by design.
He repeats the same pattern on Christianity and Catholicism. Despite his claims, there nothing apparently Christian about the guy.
Now what this ends up doing is making all MAGA types seem very unsavory to millions of Americans.
True, he’s not MAGA. But he’s been sent in to capture a portion of the MAGA audience and taint them.
This leads to his followers being isolated and becoming a divisive force.
And then the election comes along and he turns completely and seeks to demoralize as much as possible.
So it’s pretty obvious that he’s not our friend. The real question becomes is this: who is he ultimately really serving and why are they opposed to Trump/MAGA?
This literally made me cry when I saw it. This response makes me know we are going to win
🚨 UPDATE: The internet has now raised over $328,000 for Walt, the hardworking Red Baron employee who was harassed by a social media prankster while stocking pizzas at a Michigan grocery store.
Over 8,800 people have donated, and the fundraiser organizer has confirmed they’ve made contact with Walt and his family.
Sometimes the internet really does get it right ❤️🇺🇸
Nolen retweeted
President Trump has made terrible blunders, yet he has also done something no president did for 100 years.
This.
Shut down the country so tens of millions of votes are "mail-in" ballots.
Extend elections after Election Day for however long they need to "count" votes.
Spend a year pretending to care about the Epstein case so they can put out a smear report about Trump the week before the election.
Fly around Alaska searching for another Dan Sullivan to put on the ballot in an effort to confuse voters.
Ridiculously argue that requiring ID is too much to ask for when someone goes to vote.
Democrat will do anything to win elections except run on good policies that people support.
Nolen retweeted
95% of Muslims will vote.
50% of Christians vote.
If 60% of Christians voted, America would be a better country.
Vote your values. The left is.
Dayum.
Just turned mine off...Good grief.
Readers added context they thought people might want to know
Live Listen is an Apple accessibility feature that lets an iPhone act as a microphone for the user's AirPods or hearing aids. The setting in the post controls remote access to active sessions and transcripts for devices on the same Apple Account.
support.apple.com/en-us/102479
support.apple.com/en-us/111777
Nolen retweeted
Why is everyone suddenly so obsessed with some foreign election?
How come you don’t see every single establishment tool join a coordinated chorus on elections in any other country, but suddenly everyone from Alex Soros to Gavin Newsom to Midlife Mark Ruffalo are all fixated on Brazil?
Weird…
Nolen retweeted
Imagine watching Communists straight up steal an election in Brazil and sitting out the midterms over gas prices.
This might not happen if we lose the house but if we lose 2028 it’s going to suck






















