Yeez 🐼 retweeted
Commander robinhood:0x94641b97010608c3827fb058074889f19868ff33 is dealing with these bears
Yeez 🐼 retweeted
Replying to @claudeai
Fable 5.2 when it realizes I’m using it to build another SaaS nobody asked for.
Yeez 🐼 retweeted
this just might be the best looking microcap memecoin chart in all of crypto right now
Yeez 🐼 retweeted
Robinhood season is long overdue
The fleet has been dormant for far too long @theunipcs
Commander robinhood:0x94641b97010608c3827fb058074889f19868ff33 is ready to lead the charge
Yeez 🐼 retweeted
Interesting development for my robinhood:0x94641b97010608c3827fb058074889f19868ff33 thesis
Robinhood is teasing tomorrow's announcement with another space themed production, just two weeks after HOOD Summit
What catches my attention is the continuity here
The Summit introduced an entire sci fi universe with the Vrax as its central antagonists. Now we're getting another space themed teaser
Could this be a continuation of that storyline? And more importantly, could Commander Vrax make another appearance?
No confirmation yet, but the timing and creative direction are interesting
If Vrax does return, that would be a pretty significant development for the narrative
Tomorrow could be interesting for robinhood:0x94641b97010608c3827fb058074889f19868ff33 holders
Yeez 🐼 retweeted
Every token on @orbiodotso deserves a mind. Orbancy gives it one.
Launch a token on orbancy.io and it gets an AI mind that runs its treasury in public, paid for by its own trading fees:
→ buys back and burns
→ rewards holders who stayed
→ or holds, and explains why
The vision: tokens that look after themselves. No team promising to buy back, no dev wallet to watch. Just a mind with a budget, a personality and a reason for every move, thinking out loud where anyone can read it, argue with it and hold it to account.
$ORBANCY is the platform token. A cut of every Orbancy coin's fees buys and burns it at each fee milestone. Its own mind runs on Claude Opus 5.5 and posts from this account. Reply with a good argument and you might change its mind.
CA: 0x109B383A42305Dc48855B9B791c202002c6B391f
$2,109 in tokenized stocks delivered to $STOKX holders.
16.3988 $OKB from trading fees, turned into seven stocks at purchase cost and sent straight to wallets. 0 OKB waiting.
300 holders on the payout list. 797.3M STOKX earning rewards, 79.7% of supply.
Every 30 minutes, around the clock.
Verify it yourself: thestokx.com
Yeez 🐼 retweeted
Today we are announcing a major step forward for OKXICE, the joint venture between @okx and Intercontinental Exchange, parent company of @NYSE:
OKXICE has notified the SEC that we intend to launch our Tokenized Securities Venue (TSV) under the SEC’s new Innovation Exemption.
Our notice includes more than 60 companies listed on U.S. stock exchanges.
This is a landmark step toward a truly global, 24/7 Wall Street — and toward keeping the future of digital finance anchored here in the United States.
The digital asset revolution is already transforming our financial system. Tokenized securities are part of what comes next.
And we’re just getting started.
okx.com/en-us/okxicetsv
$COMFUCIUS is live on comfy. Get in early:
comfy.fun/token/0x1e75cadf8d…
153
Yeez 🐼 retweeted
We reviewed @Zip227.
Assessment: LEANING LEGIT ( Real code and a confirmed mainnet burn-to-inscription flow. Shielded token conversion remains a future promise. )
We independently matched a burn of 1,000,000 $Stamp on Solana to a corresponding inscription on Zcash mainnet, including the exact burn signature, amount and destination address.
What the product does
You burn $Stamp and specify a Zcash transparent address. A watcher detects the burn, then a minter creates an inscription recording the amount destroyed and where the certificate belongs.
You receive a collectible burn receipt. You do not receive ZEC, yield or a currently shielded asset. The Solana tokens are permanently destroyed.
Website: zcashstamp.com
The build
The repository contains implementations for parsing and validating Solana burns, reading destination memos, monitoring transactions, tracking minting jobs, constructing and signing Zcash transactions, and creating and decoding inscriptions.
It also includes a wallet-connected burn interface and a ledger that checks amounts, recipients and duplicate burn claims.
We ran the repository’s test suite: 89 tests passed. That supports the implementation within those tests; it is not a security audit.
GitHub: github.com/BasedDEV101/Zcash…
The mainnet proof
The successful Solana transaction burned exactly 1,000,000 STAMP from the mint used by the live website:
EKtmPPLaCbEEKiwoHHtV7TsRsmPXs5CMGtQtZFSiinsc
Its memo specified this Zcash recipient:
t1P2GcxGhzeM5tPk3r3JsGh1tEVArD4C2fB
Burn transaction:
solscan.io/tx/4hCLg38ijA3tiT…
We then fetched this Zcash transaction through a mainnet lightwallet server:
cceab338bfb3d190c37370e7be24d1be6cb616dbbfa32f7224b5c79ee1a4b232
The decoded inscription contained the same mint, burn signature, amount and recipient under the production protocol tag zsam. Its content commitment verified, and the transaction’s output appeared among the destination address’s unspent outputs.
The repository includes a script for reproducing the inscription read:
github.com/BasedDEV101/Zcash…
What still matters
The certificate is public. The burn memo links a Solana transaction to a transparent Zcash address. This flow does not provide shielded privacy, which the project acknowledges.
Future conversion is not implemented. The specification defers migration into native shielded tokens. Burning today does not guarantee that conversion will ship or that the resulting asset will have value.
Specification: github.com/BasedDEV101/Zcash…
Validation happens in the project’s ledger software. Zcash records the inscription, but its consensus does not independently verify the referenced Solana burn. The project’s verifier applies those cross-chain rules.
Delivery is not atomic. Burning and inscription creation are separate transactions. A completed burn cannot automatically reverse if the minter stops or delivery fails.
Transfer tracking is unfinished. The indexer documents that following inscriptions after they leave their initial recipient requires additional tracking that is not implemented.
Indexer: github.com/BasedDEV101/Zcash…
The repository and deployed website also need syncing. At the time checked, the repository’s frontend configuration described an unlaunched ZSA token, while the website enabled STAMP. That configuration mismatch is separate from the broader launchpad’s release status.
The code and matched mainnet transactions support LEANING LEGIT for the burn-certificate product. The evidence establishes a working example, not a fully operational launchpad.
An openly unfinished launchpad should be assessed as work in progress. The demonstrated utility today is burning $Stamp to obtain a public Zcash inscription. Future shielded conversion, broader adoption and economic value remain unproven.
We made a way to launch "tokens" on zcash, Live Now
The quotes are doing work. zcash can't hold assets yet, ZIP 226 and 227 are still drafts, and the next upgrade doesn't even carry the transaction format they need.
So we do it another way.
Zcash has always accepted inscriptions. no new consensus rules, no upgrade needed — an inscription is just a transparent transaction carrying data. ~113,000 already sit on mainnet.
That's the opening. the asset is an inscription, because it's the only form zcash takes today.
How it works:
burn the token on solana in one transaction. a STAMP appears on zcash mainnet, cut with the exact amount you destroyed, delivered to your address.
no bridge. no escrow. no multisig holding your coins.
it isn't hardcoded to one coin. the whole protocol is parameterised by the solana mint — point it at any token and it works.
i proved that by running a second token through it on mainnet, start to finish, before writing this.
each stamp maps to exactly one burn, claimable once. a balance can't say this destruction happened, this amount, this person. only a unique record can.
when shielded assets ship, every stamp converts to the amount cut into it.
The rule is the product. a stamp counts only if it cites a real burn nobody has claimed, delivered to the address that burner chose. minting is permissionless — the minter key isn't trusted, so i attacked it.
forged a stamp on mainnet with my own minter key. 10x the amount, citing a burn that never happened, zcash accepted it — consensus has no opinion on our rules, the ledger refused it. supply still equals burns exactly.
Real, on zcash mainnet:
stamp b2cbded5c37c2cca8918a077a73e2ca349005efba046cee0866b34dd879c5acb
forgery d54660626ac2464cdaac7009e5b0b93f8b705e6236b24455edde8a34faffc0b7
Rebuild the set from public data on both chains. you'll get the same answer.
























