Jake | The People Manual retweeted
Everyone argues about 7 vs 8 hours of sleep. That's the wrong fight.
60,977 UK adults wore activity trackers. Going to bed and waking at regular times was a stronger predictor of mortality risk than how long they slept.
(SLEEP, 2024)
Jake | The People Manual retweeted
Instinct seems to have completely lost mindshare in my network. Current split: @Muse for personal, @bot for work.
Too many AI personal assistants, too little time to assess all of them. Nice work here: assistantbenchmark.com
Jake | The People Manual retweeted
34 people slept a week with a cooling mattress cover switched on and a week with it off. They felt way better with it on, but their watches barely noticed.
nightfury.io/blog/does-a-coo…
Jake | The People Manual retweeted
This is my FAVORITE prompt to create content on X.
Since I started running it on Sep 21: 333,600 → 448,600 verified impressions.
It finds my best posts, mines my week for new stories, and remixes them. Use it:
“Every Friday:
Read my X posts from the last 90 days. Rank by views. Tell me my top 3 formats and why they worked.
Check my email, Slack, calendar and our chats from the last 7 days. Pull every story with a real number, a named person or a strong opinion.
Write 4 posts that put this week’s stories into my top 3 formats. Same structure as the winners, new subject.
Score each 1-10: would someone save it, share it or reply? Cut anything under 8.
Rank the rest. For each, name the past winner it copies and how many views it got.”
Run it in Claude / ChatGpt with Gmail, Slack and Calendar connected.
Remix what works. Boring wins.
Jake | The People Manual retweeted
Your blood sugar isn't just about diabetes. It's about protecting your brain, too.
Alzheimer's getting linked to sugar intake.
It is also linked and has strong correlation with sleep quality over a period of time, especially for those aged 60 and above.
Alzheimer's disease is being linked to insulin resistance in the BRAIN.
Researchers are even studying this connection under the term "Type 3 diabetes." When your brain becomes less responsive to insulin, it can struggle to use energy efficiently, potentially affecting memory and cognitive function.
Here's what I want you to understand: Your blood sugar isn't just about diabetes. It's about protecting your brain, too. The choices you make today with your nutrition, movement, and metabolic health could impact your brain decades from now.
Jake | The People Manual retweeted
BREAKING: A revolutionary new cancer treatment called Histotripsy is showing incredible promise by literally liquefying tumors using focused sound waves, no surgery, no chemo, and no radiation needed.
And it’s in Singapore since mid 2025.
Jake | The People Manual retweeted
My god this is such a good speech that every SWE needs to hear. You know what? Every person should hear it
Keep the happy memories, eyes on the reality, be excited about the future. That’s the best that anyone can do
Jake | The People Manual retweeted
A fired Goldman Sachs quant trader taught me everything in a single conversation
He said: “We don’t do predictions. We only buy contracts where the price deviation exceeds 6%.”
It’s just that simple
That’s the desk operation for a $2 million annual salary
I fed his explanation and 5 GitHub repos into Claude, and Claude built a scanner. It processes over 400 markets every hour
This scanner can find those contracts priced in the 7-19c range, with true probabilities between 60-90%
At these entry points, you need a win rate of 1/4
And this bot’s win rate is 81%
Three months later:
From $2,000 to $8,191
99 trades, Sharpe ratio 2.30
A few cases:
ETH Merge upgrade - market 72c, true probability 88%, +19c
SOL breaks $200 - market 44c, true probability 81%, +15c
Florida hurricane cat3+ - market 81c, true probability 92%, +7c
Wheat breaks $800 - market 53c, true probability 68%, +20c
All of these were found by the scanner, and all were profitable
He looked at my terminal last week
He said: “This is what we do with $800M, 47-person team.”
And my current setup costs $25 per month
Claude - $20
VPS - $5
Repos - free
API - free
Now there are 8 agents running 24/7:
velvet_void +$697
nano_alpha +$541
ratking_eth +$407
darkpool_7 +$356
His fund returned 19% last year
And my setup returned 409% in three months
The real edge was never any secret—it’s just always been expensive, until now
70% win rate, 7 wallets copytrading rn from ~500 monitored, bot never paused, never gambling, just math and profit
Giving This Free for 24 hours. To get it:
1. Comment the word 'CLAUDE'
2. Like and Retweet this post
3. Follow me @NextGenAi5 (so i can DM you)
Jake | The People Manual retweeted
The Extinction of Sam Ovens (my pov)
There are two versions of Sam Ovens.
The first had a net worth of $65 million when he was 27:
-> Consulting(.)com went on to hit $30M a year with 20,000+ students generating $700M in revenue.
→ He cut paid ads entirely, and dropped every platform except YouTube.
→ When he was building Skool, he personally interviewed over 600 candidates for a single role.
But this new Sam Ovens is hard to watch...
His recent podcast pulled just 5,500 views in over five months. When he does surface, he's talking about hustle-monetisation with shortcuts.
Look. This is the EXACT thing the old Sam Ovens spent a decade arguing against (and was loved for).
The man who interviewed 600 people to find the right one is now the quiet half of a double act with the loudest voice in hustle media.
And I want to know what happened.
Sam's entire philosophy was subtraction.
And that's painfully aware in his thumbnails. Hormozi is the inverse.
More volume, more reach, more funnels, more noise. That game was literally built for him.
The obvious conclusion is that Hormozi changed him. But from speaking with people involved, there's a darker read to this.
Sam picked Hormozi because his mind was already made up. He went looking for someone who could take him to a bigger down-market.
He knew what he was sacrificing.
Which makes it harder to watch, not easier.
His top-tier Quantum Mastermind cost $36,000 a year. You had to already be doing $30K a month just to apply.
The positioning was clearly anti-hustle by design. That took years to build.
And then there's what Skool was supposed to be. "One billion users finding niche communities". Built during the pandemic, when that actually meant something.
I used to love watching Sam Ovens. But his aura is gone.
Every serious operator I talk to brings up Whop. It has its own payment processor. The product comparison is genuinely close. But Skool's edge obviously is not product. It is Hormozi's distribution.
Both platforms serve the low-ticket info economy. One is just more honest about it.
Skool objectively feels cheap. As someone within their TAM, my perception is that it's far more about monetisation than receiving value.
The most visible success stories are people teaching others how to make money on Skool - which gives the whole thing an MLM shape it can't shake.
New community owners arrive with that template because it's what the marketing hammers home.
And all of this to say - here's the tension I've noticed.
You can't build a billion-user product on a premium brand.
The math doesn't work. Something had to give, and Sam gave the positioning.
What I keep coming back to is something he said when Consulting(.)com first hit $30M a year.
He'd hired 45 people fast. Was posting content on every platform. He said that operations were chaotic. So he cut almost everything.
45 team-members became just 6.
And because of this, revenue dropped from $2.5M a month to just $800k, BUT the business got MORE profitable.
The man who made that decision is the same one now disappearing inside someone else's volume machine.
The most valuable thing he ever built was the trust of people who hated the rest of this industry.
The question is whether he still wants them.
Jake | The People Manual retweeted
Sleep is perhaps the most important daily thing you can do except eating to stay healthy (no need even for a gym).
Jake | The People Manual retweeted
One of the biggest problems in startups is that first-time founders often validate too late.
They spend months building products, creating brands, and writing code before discovering the core idea was weak, unclear, poorly differentiated, or solving a problem nobody urgently cared about.
That’s why Dandum exists.
Dandum is a validation system designed to help founders rigorously test and refine startup ideas before committing massive time and resources.
It helps founders think more critically about:
• market demand
• positioning
• differentiation
• customer psychology
• risks and blind spots
• long-term viability
The goal isn’t just faster validation.
It’s better decision-making at the earliest stage — where most startup mistakes actually begin.
It's still early, but I’d love thoughtful feedback from founders, builders, and people who’ve gone through the startup process:
dandum.com
Jake | The People Manual retweeted
How Elon Musk hires:
Nikita Bier got 48 hours to redesign X's onboarding. Worked straight through the weekend. Handed Elon the prototype.
Elon walks in: "This is great. Let's move forward."
Ship fast, decide fast. Peak Elon-company culture.
Jake | The People Manual retweeted
Favorite excerpt from Brent Beshore's annual letter:
What CEOs Are and Aren’t
Most people think of a CEO as the person at the top. That’s true in the same way it’s true that the windshield is “at the front” of the car. Technically correct.
Also, misses the point. The windshield isn’t the engine. It isn’t the wheels. It doesn’t move anything. But it does determine what the driver can see, what they ignore, and what they slam into at 70 miles an hour.
When done well, the CEO job is an arbiter of truth. The CEO stands at the border between the outside world and the inside world, between company mythology and competitive reality. That sounds obvious, but it’s not.
I’d argue the norm is delusion, where organizations create realities disconnected from truth, complete with alternate headlines, villains, and heroes, all proclaimed with a shocking level of certainty.
So the CEO’s job starts with a basic question: What’s true?
Not what’s comforting. Not what’s politically convenient. Not what our dashboards can measure. What’s true?
And what should we do about it?
But deciding what to do and then doing it, requires a blend of rare attributes.
The CEO must be confident enough to pick a direction and humble enough to change it.
Optimistic enough to inspire and paranoid enough to prepare.
Warm enough to build trust and hard enough to make calls that disappoint people they like and care about.
We need to strip away the mystique.
In practice, the CEO allocates three things:
Attention: If you want to understand a CEO, ignore their strategy deck and read their calendar. Where attention goes, energy flows. Where energy flows, money follows. And where money follows, the organization slowly becomes something different, usually without anyone noticing until it’s obvious. This is why the CEO’s attention is so expensive. It’s why it’s so easy to waste. There are a thousand “important” meetings that are actually just elaborate ways to avoid the one meeting that matters. There are a thousand “urgent” problems that are actually just the company asking the CEO to temporarily soothe anxiety. A CEO’s attention is the company’s flashlight. Point it at the right things and companies transform. Point it at the wrong thing long enough and the wrong thing becomes the thing.
People: The CEO builds the team that builds the team. I’ve learned that a healthy company isn’t built by a heroic CEO. It’s built by a great team operating with clarity, trust, speed, and accountability. The CEO’s role is to create that environment, protect it, and, when necessary, make the painful personnel decisions that preserve it. This sounds straightforward until you live it. Then you realize you’re not moving boxes on an org chart. You’re messing with people’s dignity, livelihoods, and families. You’re also messing with the morale of everyone who stays. Every hire is a bet. Every promotion is a signal. Every tolerated behavior becomes a de facto policy. The CEO becomes, whether they like it or not, the embodiment of culture. It’s not what they say they value, but what they practically reward, punish, ignore, and allow.
Money: This is the CEO’s most difficult job because it’s often the one they’re least trained for, that seems the most glamorous, and is extremely impactful over time. Most CEOs come up through some form of excellence in sales, operations, engineering, or product. Then one day they wake up and realize the biggest decisions they make are capital allocation decisions: reinvest or distribute, grow or consolidate, buy or build, add headcount or automate, bet on the future or play it conservative. Capital allocation is where strategy stops being a noun and becomes a verb. It is where vision gets an audit. And it’s also where a CEO can quietly ruin a business while looking busy.
It’s remarkably easy to confuse action with progress, and reinvestment with wisdom.
Oftentimes the best capital allocation decision is painfully boring: Do fewer things, do them better, and keep your powder dry. But, that’s not what gets applause.
In our world, with long-term owners, permanent capital, and no forced exit timetable, this is where the CEO job gets simpler. We don’t need theater. We don’t need growth for growth’s sake. We don’t need to hit a narrative for the next fundraising cycle or quarterly call. We can play offense when the opportunity is real and defense when it isn’t. We can say “not now” without pretending it’s “never.”
This brings me to what might be the most misunderstood part of the CEO role: The CEO is the Chief “No” Officer. Every yes is a no to something else. Every strategy is a pile of exclusions. Every commitment is a tradeoff.
The organization will always ask for more: more initiatives, more products, more meetings, more hires, more exceptions, more complexity.
Increasing complexity is the default setting of life, and companies are not exempt from natural order. A CEO has to become comfortable being the person who disappoints people in the short term so the company doesn’t disappoint everyone in the long term.
This is where I’ve personally struggled, both as a leader and as an owner. I want to be helpful, agreeable, and liked. I can easily slip into short-term people pleasing at the expense of leading well. Sometimes I’ve confused my progress anxiety for insight. I’ve wandered into decisions too early because “someone should do something.”
I’ve also learned slowly and painfully that a CEO can add enormous value simply by refusing to add noise. Clarity is kindness, but often feels like inaction to busy people. A lot of CEO work is invisible. It’s pressure management. It’s absorbing emotion without spreading it. It’s knowing what you think and how to say it with grace. It’s carrying the weight of uncertain outcomes while still asking the team to move forward decisively.
This is why, in our portfolio, we care less about a CEO’s charisma and more about their character and judgment. We’ve found that the best CEOs have a rare combination of humility and intensity. They don’t need to be the smartest person in the room, but they do need to be the clearest. They don’t need to have all the answers, but they do need to be willing to make the hard call.
Jake | The People Manual retweeted
Here's my 4+ hour conversation with Pavel Durov (@durov), founder and CEO of Telegram. This was one of the most fascinating and powerful conversations I've ever had in my life.
We discuss everything from his philosophy on freedom to government bureaucracies, intelligence agencies, human nature, mathematics, encryption, great engineering & design, education, family, and his philosophy on life.
It's here on X in full and is up everywhere else (see comment). It is translated and dubbed into Russian, Ukrainian, French, and Hindi.
Timestamps:
0:00 - Introduction
3:07 - Philosophy of freedom
6:15 - No alcohol
14:20 - No phone
20:16 - Discipline
41:28 - Telegram: Lean philosophy, privacy, and geopolitics
56:50 - Arrest in France
1:13:01 - Romanian elections
1:23:56 - Power and corruption
1:33:29 - Intense education
1:45:29 - Nikolai Durov
1:49:58 - Programming and video games
1:54:11 - VK origins & engineering
2:11:24 - Hiring a great team
2:20:40 - Telegram engineering & design
2:39:42 - Encryption
2:44:39 - Open source
2:49:26 - Edward Snowden
2:51:58 - Intelligence agencies
2:53:10 - Iran and Russia government pressure
2:56:19 - Apple
3:03:16 - Poisoning
3:29:28 - Elon Musk
3:35:31 - Money
3:44:23 - TON
3:54:13 - Bitcoin
3:57:12 - Two chairs dilemma
4:03:52 - Children
4:15:02 - Father
4:19:33 - Quantum immortality
4:26:05 - Kafka
Jake | The People Manual retweeted
Stop wasting time searching for jobs on LinkedIn and Upwork. That's old-fashioned!!!
Here are 12 new and unique websites to get hired in 30 days:
OPEN THIS ↓
Jake | The People Manual retweeted
Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang just made the boldest prediction of his career:
“AI will create more millionaires in 5 years than the internet did in 20.”
But he didn’t stop there.
He revealed exactly HOW it’ll happen
Here’s his framework for capitalizing before it’s too late: ⬇️
Jake | The People Manual retweeted
Google DeepMind's CEO just stunned 60 Minutes viewers.
The Nobel prize winner revealed:
• An AI that can see and understand in real-time
• A plan to end ALL diseases in 10 years
• Exactly when AI will surpass human intelligence
Here are his 4 most jaw-dropping insights:🧵
Jake | The People Manual retweeted
This is the world's fastest-growing company.
They hit $17M revenue in just 90 DAYS with a team of 15.
They've created something that will impact every business on Earth.
The best bit? They're not from San Francisco, New York, or London...
Here's everything you need to know:
Jake | The People Manual retweeted
Billionaire investor Chamath Palihapitiya’s interview with Andrew Schulz just went viral.
He exposed the truth about Trump’s tariffs:
It's more than a trade war...he's completely redistributing American wealth.
Here are the untold secrets of the President's $750B gamble: 🧵






























