Brian Fitzgerald ๐Ÿ€ (@BryFitz) header
Brian Fitzgerald ๐Ÿ€ (@BryFitz) profile picture

Editor @WSJ ๐Ÿ—ž Formerly verified โœŒ๐Ÿผ Itโ€™s dangerous to go alone ๐Ÿ—ก Hazard Zet Forward ๐Ÿดโ€โ˜ ๏ธ Be an organ donor ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿป Journalism is not a crime: https://teapaw.org/t.co/92IwmxADsg

Wherever the phone may travel
Joined March 2008
Photo by Brian Fitzgerald ๐Ÿ€ (@BryFitz)Photo by Brian Fitzgerald ๐Ÿ€ (@BryFitz)Photo by Brian Fitzgerald ๐Ÿ€ (@BryFitz)Photo by Brian Fitzgerald ๐Ÿ€ (@BryFitz)Photo by Brian Fitzgerald ๐Ÿ€ (@BryFitz)Photo by Brian Fitzgerald ๐Ÿ€ (@BryFitz)Photo by Brian Fitzgerald ๐Ÿ€ (@BryFitz)Photo by Brian Fitzgerald ๐Ÿ€ (@BryFitz)Photo by Brian Fitzgerald ๐Ÿ€ (@BryFitz)Photo by Brian Fitzgerald ๐Ÿ€ (@BryFitz)
Brian Fitzgerald ๐Ÿ€ retweeted
This will be shared far and wide today. โ€œThe reason we lost is the war.โ€ฆ If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest.โ€
One of the things the data analysts on our side obsessed over was "composition"โ€”whether the electorate looked close enough to 2024 for Republicans to win. And despite polls that showed a Democrat blowout, the data kept on telling us the same story: in some states turnout was merely OK, in other states it was downright amazing, and in no state was it catastrophic. There was a genuine sense of optimism on our team: our people were showing up. So, I asked the smartest data guy I know, does that mean we're going to shock the world? "No," he told me. "We might do better than the polls suggest. But the data is telling us that a lot of Trump/Vance 2024 voters are pissed and planning to vote for the other guys. Our voters are turning out, but they may not vote for us." Well, that looks prophetic now. Our voters did show up. In Florida, for example, the electorate was 9 points more Republican than Democrat, just a couple points worse than 2024. Undoubtedly there were places we could have done better on turnout. But the main problem is not turnout. The main problem is that many people who voted for Trump/Vance in 2024 voted for Democrats in 2026. There will be a lot of infighting and arguing over what happened and why that is. One of the pollsters I really respect told me that our economic messaging wasnโ€™t sharp enough down the stretch. Iโ€™m sure thatโ€™s true. But the real reason we lost is obvious to almost everyone. Another pollsterโ€”one of the smartest people I know in politics, told me yesterday weโ€™d lose the generic ballot by 13 points. I felt negative going into Tuesday, but even I was shocked by this. In his polling, he saw that a lot of Trump 2024 voters were angry and planning to vote for Democrats. He asked those voters who had abandoned us what would cause them to come back on our team. The top four answers, accounting for nearly all of the responses were: 1) End the war 2) Focus on cost of living/inflation 3) Put America First 4) Change our relationship to Israel Our voters showed up. And the above four reasons are why many of them voted for Democrats. This is according to a pollster who nailed the results. While many spent Monday attacking Rachel Campos Duffy for calling for a diplomatic resolution to the conflict, it turns out her political advice was sound. (Sheโ€™s also a great person.) In the next few months, there's going to be a lot of gaslighting. Expect to hear any number of establishment politicians say the solution to our woes is amnesty. I'm open to the idea that we should change enforcementโ€”by focusing more on businesses that hire illegal labor, for instance. But anyone pushing amnesty is lying to you. The reason we lost is the war. The president himself said so last night. If you'd like to argue it was worth it, that losing the Senate for the next 6 years was worth it, then do so. Argue it was a worthwhile cost to pay. Agree or disagree, that's at least honest. But everyone knows why we lost. And any honest conversation about where we go from here must start there. I remain hopeful about our country. To the people who are pissed off and want to say, โ€œI told you soโ€: youโ€™re right, you did tell us so. Take that energy into electing Republicans who share your worldview. To the people who are just pissed at the results, you should be. Letโ€™s take that anger and get back to the work of saving our country.
2
4
14
1,690
The historical notes were pouring out like a spilled bag of M&Ms. wsj.com/livecoverage/midtermโ€ฆ
78
The @WSJ live coverage is the place to be today. Download our app, turn on Live Activities and read our coverage all night. wsj.com/livecoverage/midtermโ€ฆ
100
Happy Election Day, @NJTRANSIT! Our train on RVL is going to arrive 21 mins late going to Newark. So who just didnโ€™t show for work today? Now two trains of people crowd in. When does this get better?
214
Brian Fitzgerald ๐Ÿ€ retweeted
If youโ€™re interested in Villanova hoops and not following Dylan, you should change that.
๐Ÿ“Palazzo dello Sport Villanova basketball opens its season shortly.
1
1
4
1,203
Brian Fitzgerald ๐Ÿ€ retweeted
Villanovaโ€™s band made the trip to Rome.
10
2
82
2,477
Brian Fitzgerald ๐Ÿ€ retweeted
Hereโ€™s the Villanova band a little earlier getting things started at the VU pregame reception.
10
72
3,040
Fined for hitting with his shoulder.
#Giants RB Cam Skattebo was fined $7,073 for use of the helmet on this play, the second time heโ€™s been fined that amount, which is the discretionary amount under the fine schedule of $23,882 for first offenses and $47,762 for the second.
210
No lies detected
Candy corn is the worst Halloween candy in the face of the planet and itโ€™s not even close.
166
Seeing this in my feed on Friday morning is not welcome. Donโ€™t want to relive it.
DISATROUS PLAY CALLING ON THAT DRIVE
91
Jesus Christ
This is such a bleak story about what it's like to try to land a job right now. nytimes.com/interactive/2026โ€ฆ
169
The runs to play for a FG and then oops remembering you donโ€™t want to kick a 55 yarder is the coup de grรขce of this game.
Honestly amazed by JMUโ€™s costly plays tonight. Weโ€™ve got a pick-6. Two runs and timeouts to set up a โ€ฆ. Hail Mary attempt? Giving up a third-and-15 run on the goal line with the emergency QB in the game. How does all of those plays happen?
142
Brian Fitzgerald ๐Ÿ€ retweeted
Alaska is turning into this year's craziest Senate race. โ€œNever a dull moment in the great state of Alaska,โ€ said Sen. Dan Sullivan, one of the two Dan Sullivans on the ballot. WSJ's @lindsaywise reports from Anchorage. wsj.com/politics/elections/hโ€ฆ
5
7
744
Brian Fitzgerald ๐Ÿ€ retweeted
The legal team @wsj is the secret sauce in their most impactful work. Thatโ€™s true at @wapo as well. Good chance to thank the lawyers who support journalismโ€” including all those working at @rcfp.
"You Can See Everything," the genre-bending documentary about convicted Theranos fraudster Elizabeth Holmes, has become a smash hit. Jay Conti, the lead lawyer on WSJ's coverage of the blood-testing company a decade ago, shares what it was like to vet the investigation.
24
3
133
55,144
Brian Fitzgerald ๐Ÿ€ retweeted
I was scheduled to interview @marissamayer about her new AI assistant, Dazzle, this past Monday. Then, over the weekend, that anecdote in a New York Times profile of Mayer went viral, sparking a wave of criticism that eventually reached even TMZ. If you somehow didn't see it, the anecdote involved Mayer using Dazzle to help describe one of her 10-year-old twin daughters for a school birthday celebration. By Wednesday, a post on this very app calling the use case โ€œso bleakโ€ had racked up more than 3 million views. I understood the immediate reaction. A quick reading could suggest that Mayer needed help from AI to identify three unique traits of her own daughter. The prevailing judgment online: How sad was that? Still, I suspected there was more context. I've written enough profiles to know how much nuance can get lost when a single anecdote takes off like that. And while Silicon Valley's wealth bubble has surprised me plenty over the years, I had a hard time believing Mayer had simply asked an AI assistant to tell her what made her daughter special. Plus, I'd wanted to interview Mayer well before the controversy. When she first announced Dazzle a few weeks earlier, we were smack in the middle of the Muse-Instinct craze. Mayer and Dazzle were taking a different approach, betting that screenshots and other photos in our phone camera rolls could provide an AI assistant with more useful context than connections to email or calendars. I'd already spent some time testing Dazzle myself and had plenty of questions. How useful could an assistant built around our camera rolls really be? And how comfortable would people be giving it that kind of access? So I was glad Mayer didn't cancel our interview Monday. We talked about the birthday slide controversy, of course, and the context she believes was missing. Then we got into the questions about Dazzle that had made me want to interview her in the first place. My full interview with Mayer, along with my own impressions from testing Dazzle, is in this week's edition of @ReadTheAisle: readtheaisle.com/p/marissa-mโ€ฆ I'd love to hear what you think...
8
13
2
142
63,936
Brian Fitzgerald ๐Ÿ€ retweeted
All of us at Marvel Studios are deeply saddened by the passing of Sir Patrick Stewart. Sir Patrick brought Professor Charles Xavier to life with extraordinary grace, intelligence, and humanity, defining the character for generations of fans, from "X-Men" to "Logan" to "Avengers: Doomsday." He was a singular talent, a generous collaborator, and a true gentleman. Our hearts go out to his wife Sunny, his children, his friends, and the countless fans around the world whose lives he touched with his art.
3,767
108,836
11,351
535,025
9,263,386
God I love โ€œThe Diplomat.โ€
1
150
Brian Fitzgerald ๐Ÿ€ retweeted
Going through the archives, and I seem to have spent most of my professional career asking Apple to put a touchscreen on a Mac. The answers gradually shifted from โ€œNopeโ€ to evasive laughter. October 2021, a guy named John Ternus told me:
43
40
8
1,144
91,577