Pointe shoes and polo necks

Joined July 2019
As an alumna, I am shocked to see this @UniofOxford. This is clear-cut harassment. Female students should not be exposed to this in lectures or tutorials. It's unprofessional (at best). Please let us know you will take steps to ensure female students are not subjected to this.
“We expect everyone involved in teaching to maintain appropriate professional standards and to treat students with respect.” That was Oxford University's response when [Un]Captured asked about a male tutor wearing giant prosthetic breasts to work. Biochemistry lecturer Matt Rattley has kicked off the autumn term with new photos wearing his infamous ‘norks’ - including one in a lecture theatre with students. The university declined to discuss individual personnel matters. Full story at [Un]Captured 👇
7
46
260
6,767
Shocked, I tell you. Shocked.
The Green Party member, Lubna Speitan, behind the “Zionism is racism” motion is close friends with an al-Qaeda terrorist who plotted to bomb passengers landing at Heathrow from Israel. It can now be revealed that Ms Speitan offered to testify in the defence of Minh Quang Pham, jailed in the US for a plot to detonate a backpack filled with shrapnel dipped in rat poison in the airport arrivals lounge. 🔗: telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2…
105
Susan Chynoweth retweeted
All those going to Edinburgh festival this year- do please support this wonderful production! edfringe.com/tickets/whats-o…
2
17
33
2,085
What the ever living feck...? Maybe he could be next year's Eurovision entry?
If the devil has all the best tunes maybe this lot really are Christians?
141
When did it become canonical to claim Heathcliff was black/mixed race? And why are people more wound up about that than the fact a murderous, abusive psychopath has been romanticised? First mixed (actual) hero in Victorian fiction was Ozias Midwinter in Armadale by Collins.
1
102
This is Charlotte, Emily's sister on Rochester, Mrs Reed, & her son.
1
513
He really wasn't...
🎭 William Shakespeare was a “black Jewish woman” who used used the Bard's name as a pen-name, according to a new book. Read the full report from @Craig_Simpson_ here ⤵️ telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/01…
3
99
She is smashing it! #TeamHarriet
Harriet is very clever and clearly a fan of the show. Usually when two players have an out of nowhere conflict it’s because they’re BOTH Traitors and she’s clocked it #TheTraitors
1
115
Susan Chynoweth retweeted
Hail the Oxford comma
347
2,610
250
34,466
1,171,691
Susan Chynoweth retweeted
Tonight’s Traitors is proof we should all read Harriet’s books. #TheTraitorsUK
1
3
454
Susan Chynoweth retweeted
Hugo reminds me of so many pompous men I have worked with over the years.
21
5
1
349
53,697
I mean, she's the best...
Harriet throwing Hugo under the bus for being a barrister whilst being an undercover barrister is QUEEN behavior #TheTraitors #TraitorsUK
1
88
Susan Chynoweth retweeted
Harriet giving her speech to Hugo at the roundtable #TheTraitorsUK #thetraitors
5
226
3
6,213
153,692
Me too
You’re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more
70
Susan Chynoweth retweeted
One must assume, from reading this judgment, that the tribunal was more concerned with discouraging further litigation than with giving full and fearless effect to the Equality Act. At the heart of this case lies a straightforward question: does a biologically male employee have a legal right to undress in a female-only changing room? For Women Scotland answered that question at the Supreme Court: women-only spaces are for biological women. Yet instead of applying that binding precedent, the tribunal awarded Sandie Peggie a technical win based on procedural failings and delay, while simultaneously undermining the legitimacy of her complaint. The effect is a ruling that says: “You were treated badly, but only because you reacted to a situation we pretend has no legal significance.” For Women Scotland affirmed that sex in law means biological sex – not gender identity. That matters because single-sex spaces exist specifically to recognise biological difference. The tribunal contradicted that point. It acknowledged that one person was biologically female and the other biologically male, then declared that this distinction becomes irrelevant once clothing is removed – precisely when women are at their most vulnerable. In doing so, the tribunal ignored sex-based protections contained within the Equality Act at the very moment they are most needed. The technical win deserves scrutiny. It is a sophisticated manoeuvre: the judgment is generous enough to grant Peggie a partial win, but not so generous as to uphold all her claims. It is, arguably, a savagely ingenious move – providing just enough success to dull enthusiasm for appeal, while ensuring that the most legally explosive question continues to bend to stonewall. The message is unmistakable: accept your crumbs and walk away. The outcome is a legally incoherent position: sex is relevant enough to identify, but too controversial to enforce. The tribunal elevated employer preference above statutory entitlement. Because NHS Fife allowed a biologically male colleague into a women-only space, the court treated Peggie’s objection as unreasonable. When policy choices override legal rights, those rights have already been hollowed out. One of the most troubling passages asserts there is insufficient evidence that a male person poses greater risk than a woman does. That is a fundamental misunderstanding of safeguarding. Safeguarding is not reactive – it is preventative. It exists because vulnerability begins at exposure. Voyeurism, indecent viewing, intimidation – these harms do not require physical contact. The tribunal’s logic would justify installing smoke alarms only after the fire has started. In addition, there is a distinct tone of moral superiority – gender-critical beliefs are technically lawful, yet treated as socially defective. The implication is that Peggie was protected not because she was right, but because the law is obliged to tolerate her. A right that survives only in silence is no right at all. This judgment leaves employers without clarity and women with fewer rights. The purpose of a judgment is not to maintain institutional comfort. It is to state the law. Peggie’s case presented a direct conflict – gender identity versus sex-based boundaries. The tribunal refused to resolve it in accordance with precedent. That refusal is the failure. This is why Peggie should, in my view, appeal. Not for a different trophy, but because the law needs the courage this judgment lacked. If allowed to stand, it will be provided as proof of the proposition that single-sex rights are discretionary. That women’s privacy is conditional. The emotional toll of continuing is something we should all recognise. Sandie Peggie has already shown a resilience most people will never be asked to demonstrate. But rights that depend on the stamina of those who defend them are already eroding. Where fear governs the interpretation of rights, those rights are already being lost.
The judgment in Sandie Peggie vs NHS Fife and Dr Upton has been published. We are pleased that Sandie Peggie has won her claim of harassment against NHS Fife, and that the hospital trust was criticised for its terrible handling of the complaint against her.
79
677
82
2,318
153,578
I grew up with the stories of the North Berwick "witches". It informed so many of my ideas about power, heresy, and conformity. Especially when the victims are women.
Woman of the Day maidservant and healer Geillis Duncan of Tranent, East Lothian, was executed OTD in 1591 at Castle Hill, Edinburgh. Her crime? She was skilled at healing the sick — too good, in fact, curing people that even doctors couldn’t help. Obviously she must have been a witch. Consider the evidence. Trained in the classical traditions of Hippocrates and Galen who lived over 1400 years before, doctors in the late 16th century swore by the power of leeches, used chemicals like mercury and antimony, employed cauterisation and turpentine, and dispensed painkillers like opium, mandrake, and hemlock. They worked only for those wealthy enough to afford their services. Everyone else had to rely on local healers, usually women who used local herbs and rituals, and what would they know of Hippocrates and Galen? Yet Geillis, who worked for the deputy bailiff of Tranent, slipped out of the house at night without explanation and returned after tending to people and curing them or alleviating their pain. “This Geillis Duncan took in hand to help all such as were troubled or grieved with any kind of sickness or infirmity, and in short space did perform many matters most miraculous...made her master and others to be in great admiration, and wondered there at.” — Newes from Scotland, 1591 An ambitious man, keen to be of service to his king, her employer was aware of James VI’s obsession with ridding his kingdom of the malign influence of witches. In the royal mind, they were everywhere. When James returned from Copenhagen with his new bride Anne of Denmark, the ship was beset by storms. Someone had to be responsible; there was no other possible explanation. A hasty witch hunt in Denmark in which two women were terribly tortured into confessing that they had raised the storms that threatened the voyage, sending devils to climb up the keel of the ship, was all the proof he needed. In September 1590, the two women were burned as witches at Kronberg. Hugely impressed by such a decisive outcome, James set up his own tribunal in Scotland. It was so easy: torture someone mercilessly until they confessed and named a co-conspirator, then do the same to the co-conspirator till they gave someone else up. It was remarkably effective. So keen was he to get results that he personally questioned impoverished old women under torture till they gave up their wicked secrets, but all of that came later. The pathfinder was Geillis’s employer. He personally applied pilliwinks (thumbscrews) to Geillis and then had her “thrawed” (twisting and turning a rope around her head). When that didn’t produce a confession, she was stripped bare, shaved all over, and every crevice of her body examined for the Devil’s Mark (a mole or any slight imperfection). He found one on her throat. After days and days of sleep deprivation, torture and intense interrogation, the girl - she was still in her teens - confessed all: a pact with the Devil, attendance at a witches’ sabbath at the North Berwick kirk on Halloween 1590 with over 200 witches, plotting with them to raise the storm to sink the King’s ship, and personally trying to poison James VI. Geillis was brought to Edinburgh and tried before a commission appointed by James VI who took a personal interest in the case (I bet he did, oh I bet he did). She was convicted of witchcraft and sorcery, strangled at the stake and then her body burned at Castle Hill - but not before recanting her confession. Well, she would, wouldn’t she? Some people will say anything to avoid a horrible death. Geillis’s ordeal is considered to be the spark that ignited the North Berwick Trials: around 70 people were accused and at least 30–40 executed in Edinburgh and Lothian between 1590 and 1592. Shakespeare found them rich material for Macbeth, in which the three witches cast spells that purposely created storms to destroy ships. When did the madness stop? Not for another 137 years. The vast majority of the accused were women, about 80%, and the last person to be tried and executed of witchcraft in Scotland was Janet Horne of Dornoch in 1727. That’s because everyone knows what a woman is.
1
2
73
Calls from some, including @RupertLowe10, to bring back the death penalty. Two words: Peter Sullivan - an innocent man who lost 40 years to a catastrophic miscarriage of justice. How many more would be killed by the state before the truth emerged? Justice is fallible. The death penalty is irreversible.
71
37
2
182
7,407
Susan Chynoweth retweeted
This briefing from BBC “insider” sources is insane. The charge seems to be Gibb is right wing & that invalidates some well-founded criticisms of BBC impartiality failings in a couple of well-founded areas. And it’s bad that “newer” members of board agreed with Gibb. Has it occurred to them they may just not share the defensive groupthink culture of the BBC great and good that has been so obvious in recent days?! The irony is this briefing feels like BBC groupthink in action.
89
275
24
1,306
195,874