Ellen Highwater KPSS WRN retweeted
If we were really for women, we wouldn't object to harmful abuse that causes brain damage, strokes and death. Apparently.
These men actually think they are doing women a favour.
Replying to @ForWomenScot
If you were really “for women” then you would want women to feel powerful during sex instead of demonising them.
You’re right, we SHOULD be educating people on porn and its harm. But we should also be educating those who don’t engage in more risqué kinks that it’s not-
So grateful for @SpeechUnion and glad they are supporting @ThePosieParker - she is brave on behalf of all women even if some women don't appreciate it.
The targeting of Kellie-Jay Keen, and her being charged by the Metropolitan police, is an outrage that should concern us all.
This is a sinister attempt to silence a woman who is perfectly entitled to be critical of any religion or belief she chooses. Beware those who attempt to silence women who are being openly critical of harms to other women.
Blasphemy is not a crime in the UK, nor should it be one. Everyone is equal under the law, and free speech must be defended.
Ellen Highwater KPSS WRN retweeted
We used to value the sharing of ideas, and the challenging of them. We used to talk about being able to disagree with what people said while defending to the death their right to say it. We used to consider ourselves a largely secular society with a robust ability to criticise religion and even the religious.
We used to understand that the people seeking to control speech, beyond basic limits like incitement to violence, were the villains
Now we live in a society where the police will interrogate the intentions behind what you say (essentially interrogating your thinking) and they will use the law to try and control you if someone’s feelings are hurt.
Their FEELINGS. As if there aren’t people online whose feelings are hurt by literally everything
The response to the police contacting Kellie-Jay for this tweet, from some who ought to know better, is to say that she has been pushing the limits, or saying too many controversial things anyway. As if that justifies this kind of police overreach.
As though it isn’t terrifying that the police can do this to a citizen for a TWEET and an OPINION.
Are you so unintelligent that you need the police to arrest your ideological opponents instead of you robustly challenging them?
Do you really believe opinions you don’t like should be criminal offences?
And why are we all allowing the police such power to involve themselves when even they agree there is no definite crime?
I guarantee a tweet that began “we have Christian fatigue” wouldn’t have resulted in the law getting involved.
And that would have been correct.
Just as if someone wrote “we have English fatigue” I wouldn’t be feverishly dialling 999 to report my heart was saddened
We have Muslim fatigue.
The gang rapes.
The terrorism.
The killing of little girls who enjoy music.
The hatred of women and girls.
The special courts.
The anti semitism.
The hate preachers.
The marches.
The violence.
The call to prayer.
The public prayers.
The complaining about christian preachers.
The pauses in football games for skipping lunch.
The nicabs.
The school kids visiting mosques.
The ramadan lights.
The ramadan messages on TV and by public figures. The cruel slaughter.
The hatred of the West.
The hatred of women.
The barbarism.
The inbreeding.
The censorship.
The two tier justice.
The capture of our institutions.
We're tired of it.
Islam is a vile woman hating cousin marrying child rape appeasing death cult.
The perfect riposte to this whiney Guardian interview. It was never both sides.
A lot of us were very willing to have a debate without heat, @stonewalluk, and the reason that never happened wasn't because gender critical feminists didn't want one.
While we were trying to get you to listen to our concerns, your former CEO was telling a BBC boss that gay people not wanting to include the opposite sex in their dating pool was 'sexual racism'. While we were pointing out the homophobia inherent in gender ideology, Stonewall ambassador Alex Drummond (a bearded, heterosexual man who'd had no surgery and taken no cross-sex hormones but liked wearing skirts), was going into schools to talk to students about his 'lesbian' identity. @BluskyeAllison, who actually is a lesbian, was subject to unlawful discrimination at her place of work for tweeting: ‘Stonewall recently hired Morgan Page, a male bodied person who ran workshops with the sole aim of coaching heterosexual men who identify as lesbians on how they can coerce young lesbians into having sex with them. Page called [it] “overcoming the cotton ceiling”.’
When the UK Supreme Court upheld women's right to single sex spaces, you issued a statement expressing your unhappiness about the ruling. In her report on your unhappy influence at the University of Essex, you were found by barrister @akuareindorf to have misrepresented the law as it related to women's rights: '[Stonewall have] stated the law as Stonewall would prefer it to be, rather than the law as it is’.
In 2018, you publicly advised schools to shred a research pack saying there were risks to puberty blockers, in spite of the fact that you aren't a medical charity and that there was already credible evidence that puberty blockers are neither irreversible nor harm-free. Meanwhile you produced your own educational packs, recommending a children's book, for ages 5-9, in which the parent 'is neither a man, nor a woman – they’re non-binary.' In July 2022, Stonewall sent out a tweet that read ‘Research suggests that children as young as two recognise their trans identity'.
@thetimes has reported how you've sought to control the language used by NHS trusts and government on their social-media accounts. Organisations would get points from you for replacing commonly understood words with ideologically approved terms, eg, 'birthing parent' instead of 'mother'. thetimes.com/uk/society/arti…
In short, you took a maximalist position on gender identity ideology, which you attempted to enforce by diktat. You refused to acknowledge that you'd hitched your wagon to a cause that, unlike civil rights, gay rights or women's rights, sought to strip rights from others. You sought to curtail everyone's right to freedom of speech and belief by controlling what it was permissible to think and say, through the management and political class. You have argued against women's and girl's rights to their own spaces, their sports and to assemble without men. Your former CEO tried to shame gay women/men into dating the opposite sex if the latter claimed to be female/male.
Your mantra was 'no debate' because, like all totalitarians, you preferred slogans, bullying and infiltration of powerful institutions to talking to opponents. You appear to have had no concern for the lowly people your ideology was harming: gender confused kids, female rape victims, female prisoners, regular people hounded and investigated at their places of work for refusing to accept the new mandates on sex and gender issued from on high.
Your 'activism' has been a disaster for those trans-identified people who really do just want to get on with their lives in peace. You have besmirched the name of an organisation many of us were once proud to donate to, the charity that was partly responsible for securing the legal right of gay people to marry, which a lot of us thought would never happen in our lifetimes. The milquetoast words quoted below do not erase a decade of gender activism that has been disastrous not only for individuals but for society as a whole.
There was once a debate to be had, but until you acknowledge the direct harm you've caused, it is no more possible to debate you than to persuade a person in the throes of a drug-induced psychosis that they are not, in fact, the reincarnated Christ.
A good friend of mine had cancer a few years ago. She was promised rebalancing surgery later but then told the funding for this had been withdrawn. Her oncologist surgeon was so upset that she negotiated the operations being done at cost price but it was still £2k and would not be an option for many women. Meanwhile these bastards are wasting NHS funds to remove healthy breasts at the behest of an evil global cult.
Ellen Highwater KPSS WRN retweeted
While we all have terf island fatigue and squabble amongst our political, cultural and religious tribes, the state is trying to criminalise not believing in trans.
All hands on deck #thisisnotadrill #binthebill
Ellen Highwater KPSS WRN retweeted
The real horror of Halloween.
Artificial cobweb: a bit of fake fun for you, but a very real and terrifying death for them.
If you see your neighbours using it, it's possible they don't know the danger so please print out this simple leaflet and pop it through their door:
tinyurl.com/HalloweenHedgeho…
The fine, strong synthetic fibres of this lethal 'web' are difficult for animals to see at dusk and can quickly wrap around their legs, wings, and neck, trapping and killing birds, insects and mammals.
When Eden the hedgehog struggled to free herself the web tightened, cutting off circulation and causing deep wounds.
Can you imagine the pain and sheer terror?
And then seeing dawn approach, while hanging there, tightly bound and helpless, only an inch above the ground but suffering slow strangulation.
Aside from being stressed, dehydrated, starving and exhausted, she also had horrific bite/peck wounds to her face, where she had been held there, helpless, unable to curl and defend herself, while a predator tried to eat her alive.
Tragically her constriction injuries were too severe to survive, and poor Eden had to be put to sleep.
If you have used this deadly cruel trap to 'decorate' your garden, I beg you - take it down now.
Please spread this vital information, and help save lives.
Ellen Highwater KPSS WRN retweeted
The electorate aren’t goldfish. Our memories are long enough to recall June 2024, when you declared that trans-identified men with penises should be able to use women’s public bathrooms. It took a Supreme Court ruling to force you to uphold women’s rights, and now you pose as our bold champion? Please.
The time for talk has long passed. This government is putting its money where its mouth is when it comes to supporting women and girls.
We'll back practical action to confine misogyny to the history books - in public services, workplaces, and online.
theguardian.com/society/2026…
For a lovely I thought this daft woman was promoting @JoPhoenix1's book but sadly it's just about shagging in the shrubbery.
Gutted by the loss of a lovely friend and WRN colleague but Claire was so much more than that. She taught me so much, challenged my thinking and left me completely in awe that one woman could be so accomplished. A quick mind, a brilliant writer, a tech genius, biker chick, baker, gardener, knitter and of course wife, mum, sister and aunty. Feeling bereft but also so, so lucky to have known her.
Sleep well you gorgeous woman 💔💔💔
ANNOUNCEMENT
It’s with heavy hearts that WRN announce the death of one of our own, the truly fabulous Claire Loneragan.
Claire was a fundamental part of WRN since its inception and had been key to the growth and the success of our organisation. She is irreplaceable as a WRNer and as a Director. Most importantly though, as a dear friend. We will miss her immensely.
We know that all our WRN members will feel her loss deeply, not least her ‘home’ group of Somerset and Dorset.
We send our sincere heartfelt sympathies to her husband Dave, her children, her wider family, and her many friends.
Claire had been ill for some time but maintained her typical good humour, courage (and not a small amount of ice cream) throughout.
When we have needed wisdom, hard work and application, Claire had provided these in abundance. Her hand was in everything that we did. And we all endeavoured to ‘Be More Claire’ as a result.
But more importantly than that, she was always our dear friend.
Goodbye Claire.
We love you so much xx
Ellen Highwater KPSS WRN retweeted
Please take note: Of the two Irish authors who can't get their books into UK bookshops, I'm the one who supports feminists, not rapist Islamists.
Excellent rebuttal letter. It is singularly depressing to see a Minister either deliberately lying to the public or being too stupid to understand the legal ramifications of a bill she is pushing though.
1/ We’ve written to the Secretary of State for Equalities concerning misinformation that appeared in an article she wrote over the weekend. It’s important that the debate around the draft conversion bill is accurate and the Minister should promote this.
gaymensnetwork.co.uk/letters
Ellen Highwater KPSS WRN retweeted
🚨226 children, some as young as 11 years old, are about to be given £500 worth of shopping vouchers by the UK Government in order to undertake a puberty blockers trial, placing them on a pathway to infertility.
This is the medical scandal of our time.
jamesesses.co.uk/p/state-san…
What I love about this is that it is a near perfect example of a 'difficult management conversation' - the kind of thing that used to be role played on countless training courses at the Civil Service College before they closed it in favour of on-line learning. Nature is healing.
Just beyond belief and no-one is ever held to account. Please support @recusant_raja if you can. Link in next post.
Ellen Highwater KPSS WRN retweeted
I posted this earlier and the bloated individual who said that "it's just a building, people matter more," locked down his replies shortly afterward.
Here is what I have to say and I mean every word.
I mean it with an internal violence of emotion and historical backing.
It isn't about the building. It's what the building represents. You say that it's about people? So is history. History is made by people. It is meant to linger. It should stand as something that lasts. A living legacy made before to help us understand where we are now.
To see how far we come.
Pages get lost. People turn to dust.
Building and art are meant to last. They were made by human hands.
I am so tired of being lectured by pseudo intellectuals who think that history has no place in modern society unless they get to rewrite it.
Those buildings matter more than the invaders sent to destroy them. Not only does Western civilization deserve to survive, but all this stands as a point of historical merit.
Invaders ransack and destroy cities to erase what came before. You dont see it as important, because you are lucky enough to remember. What about generations from now? A scruffy young man who wants freedom searching for anything to give him hope? Anything that isn't muddled by the travesty that you want to usher in? It will all be forgotten then.
Silly, petulant, loathsome people say that buildings are more important than people. In some cases, yes.
But my question is: would you do this? Would you traipse into someone's home and destroy what they hold dear?
And if you wouldn't, what does that say about the people who do? And if they would do all this to buildings to prove a point? What would they do to you?
History already knows the answer, but you seek to abolish it for future generations.
































