Pinned Tweet
It's no secret that I have been pursuing a line of research into value-form and real abstraction that wages on the resources of so called analytic Hegelianism to illuminate it. For those interested in this program, here's a few steps:
Planes of implication retweeted
Interesting difference in how the BBC and The Guardian are reporting Brazil’s presidential election.
The BBC explicitly identifies Lula as a left wing president but says nothing about the political position of his opponent, Flávio Bolsonaro.
Instead, it mentions that Bolsonaro’s father, former president Jair Bolsonaro, is under house arrest.
The Guardian, covering the same election, explicitly identifies Flávio Bolsonaro as far right.
Flávio Bolsonaro is a highly controversial political figure, yet the BBC tells readers more about his father’s legal situation than his own political position.
Why did the BBC consider it important to identify Lula as left wing while omitting the fact that his opponent is far right?
During the election, Lula was censored on Instagram and TikTok while Bolsonaro was promoted and favoured.
I provided technical analysis to investigative journalists in Brazil covering those allegations. My interview with them is available on Instagram. Link below.
Planes of implication retweeted
To accuse another country's regime of FRAUD is a pretty serious thing. It is VERY IRRESPONSIBLE to do so without knowing AT LEAST the fucking basics about the country you're talking about. Nothing could be more annoying than reading these ready-made self-asserted bullshit here.
Planes of implication retweeted
The fact that Brazilian markets panicked and crashed the three times Lula was previously elected (and are doing so a fourth time now), only to boom during his terms in office, poses a real challenge to the efficient market hypothesis.
Replying to @Abhishek060722
The claimed figures are not supported by official TSE data. Final certified results: Lula 51.79% (64,256,232 votes), Flávio Bolsonaro 48.21% (59,826,041). Early partials around 5pm (0.25% counted) showed Lula ahead ~57.7%–42.3%. Counting paused briefly for the court-ordered 2-hour extension (requested by both campaigns over transport/rain issues); later tallies flipped briefly then settled on Lula’s win.
Planes of implication retweeted
There's no attempted fraud you fuck, both parties requested an extension of voting hours, and one of the requests dealt with fundamental constitutional rights hindered, which is dealt by the Supreme Court. You know nothing about the Brazilian Constitution. Go fuck yourself.
unavailable
Never forget this tiny detail
Flávio Bolsonaro wants Brazil’s election annulled because, he claims, Lula “changed the rules halfway through the game” by extending voting hours.
There’s just one rather inconvenient detail. Bolsonaro’s own campaign ALSO requested an extension!
His request covered specific areas, while Lula’s was nationwide, but both wanted voting hours extended.
Now, having lost by 4.4 million votes, he wants the result overturned over a measure his own campaign supported.
Quite extraordinary.
Planes of implication retweeted
pensando aqui, muito se bateu na tecla de que o boulos precisava suavizar seu discurso pra se distanciar da pecha radicalista e acabou que um personagem central desse turno foi um maluco que mandava áudio gritando pra 10 milhões de pessoas pelo whatsapp falando EXPLODE
Planes of implication retweeted
Regarding the election in Brazil, Bolsonaro and Lulu both asked for extensions regarding the voting window.
Yet all I’m seeing is American’s on the right claiming the leftist candidate cheated by asking for it.
No mention of Bolsonaro’s request? Odd.
Planes of implication retweeted
I find it amazing how Twitter was simply activated. Went from 0 tweets to coordinated attacks by Tommy Robinson, End Wokeness and other types who have never written about Brazil till today
Planes of implication retweeted
@alanmendoza Since you're all of a sudden such an expert on Brazilian elections, do you want to comment on this? It was only applied where polling stations were still opened because the ones that weren't opened didn't have anybody in line anymore. Does that make sense to you, or is this still some grand conspiracy and so shocking that the people of Brazil said they do not want to be the backyard of the Epstein Zionist class that rules America right now?
Planes of implication retweeted
Replying to @alanmendoza
Well, are you upset about the fact that Bolsonaro-aligned mayors shut down the legally required free buses in an effort to suppress the poor vote which leans for Lula, even resulting in an arrest? @Grok is that true? Also, did Bolsonaro only want to keep the polls open in places that he had an advantage where Lula wanted the polls kept open across the country?
Planes of implication retweeted
I said it on Chapo and on the Viracascas podcast: Brazil can be the first domino in a series of defeats for the far-right in the Americas.
Next stop: THE MIDTERMS. GO WIN THIS SHIT.
Planes of implication retweeted
The defeat of Flavio Bolsonaro will have reprecussions well beyond Brazil borders.
It is, of course, a huge and welcome setback for Israel's influence and intelligence operations in Latin America. The biggest fish of all got away - the Bolsonaro clan made no secret of its love of Israel and especially Mossad.
But it is a massive defeat for Trump and MAGA. The Donroe Doctrine is now in serious trouble. Lula will now officially outlast Trump and possibly his neighbour to the south, the unpopular Trump-worshipping Milei, who openly allied with Bolsonaro and faces serious economic headwinds coming up to next year's elections in Argentina.
There is light at the end of the tunnel.
Planes of implication retweeted
One of Lula’s most important and least well-known achievements is US capacity to sanction it into compliance is limited, because unlike Europe, Brazilians don’t need Visa or Mastercard to make payments.
Pessoal continua falando que a eleição "contraria a matemática".
Quero me matar dando um tiro pro alto e esperando a bala rodopiar no ar e atingir a minha testa, "contrariando a física", se continua lendo isso.
Planes of implication retweeted
In Brazil, if you are in line to vote inside the voting station you have a legal right to vote, meaning polls stay open past 5pm all the time. This is fake news. What happened was those polls were people were no longer voting closed and those where they did followed the extension
The major question in Brazil…
At exactly 5pm, a code is supposed to be entered that closes and locks the voting machines. Once a machine is locked, it can’t accept any more votes. It’s irreversible.
The Supreme Court extension was relayed a few minutes after polls were supposed to be closed and machines locked.
So… which machines were kept open? In what districts were those machines? And why weren’t they locked at 5pm?
Planes of implication retweeted
Quando algum Zé Doidim chegar questionando o resultado das eleições de hoje, mostre esse vídeo pra ele.
A TRAGÉDIA MATEMÁTICA
➡️ "Não tem lógica. Para mim, é uma tragédia", diz Marçal sobre resultado das eleições
🤳 @SamPancher / Metrópoles





















