Pinned Tweet
For those who haven't read the article yet, this will be the most detailed article you have ever read on the subject.
So I request everyone to please read the article and share if you like. – at Delhi, India
In this article, @Jinesh_Choraria examines the evolution of Halal from a personal religious classification into a global certification ecosystem. Tracing its theological foundations, institutional development, and economic architecture, he argues that Halal today extends far beyond food to shape supply chains, markets, and regulatory frameworks.
Read: bit.ly/44tGy5t
Seen this retarded post too many times now. What does it prove?
Srimad Bhagvatam calls Rishabhdev as an incarnation of Vishnu and follower of Varnashrama Dharma.
Now either we keep on endlessly fighting over it or just accept that they are common figures across Indian beliefs.
This is so beautiful 😍
Also thank you for sacking the guy who used to do laser light decoration.
दिव्य दीपोत्सव की प्रतीक्षा में सजी भव्य राम नगरी
दीपावली के पावन पर्व पर अपने आराध्य प्रभु श्रीराम के स्वागत में संपूर्ण श्रीराम जन्मभूमि परिसर अलौकिक आभा से दमक रहा है। आधुनिक रोशनी से जगमगाते भव्य मंदिर की छटा मन मोह लेने वाली है। आइए, इस पावन बेला पर श्रद्धा का एक दीप आप भी प्रज्वलित करें।
फोटो - श्रीराम जन्मभूमि तीर्थ क्षेत्र ट्रस्ट, अयोध्या
There maybe many more. When a singer was killed in Afghanistan in 2021 his native place named “Kishnabad” came to limelight.
Jinesh Choraria retweeted
A perfect metaphor for our civilisation — broken, battered and bludgeoned by asuric forces bent on destroying us, yet standing tall, defeating them and marching towards glory.
A salute to Captain Machchar and the indomitable spirit of Aryavarta!
Jinesh Choraria retweeted
In this article, @anon_amo takes us through the Iranian revolution and how the black-red alliance crafted a symphony of anarchy which led to the end of a 2500 old monarchial institution, based on their common theological hatred for the monarchy, and its parallel's in India, where instead of black, the color could have been or could be blue.
link: bit.ly/3UnskSg
Jinesh Choraria retweeted
Census 2011 says 31% of India is Urban, while World Bank and UN estimate it to be 55% and 63% respectively. So, why does India underestimate its urban population?
@SpatialIndia argues that the fault lies with the Census’s two-box urban/rural classification criteria and calls for a third category for areas in transition.
jungindien.in/blog/dehat-by-…
Why do commies have to complicate everything to a point where their words stop making sense?
Religion is not a thing with fixed properties. It is a terrain of struggle that different class forces attempt to mobilise for different projects. Whether a particular religious movement is emancipatory or reactionary depends on who is mobilising it, for what purpose, and in what material context. Religion must be analysed in relation to the material base of the society in which it operates
> Naam Ragadwa dega tujhse
Meanwhile descendants of Aurangzeb and Mughals are rubbing their nose in Gurudwaras asking for forgiveness for the sins of their ancestors.
Although it was just an eyewash IMO, as she wanted an increase in her pension.
Jinesh Choraria retweeted
No, Savarkar didn't.
Jinnah’s first claim for Two-Nation Theory is dated April 1936, when he said Muslims could reach a settlement with Hindus “as two nations, if not as partners.”
That was way before Savarkar’s 1937 claim that Hindus and Muslims were two nations in India.
Also, there's a nuance to Savarkar's position (which raises serious questions he left unanswered; hence, I don’t defend, but will explain) :
At the Hindu Mahasabha’s Ahmedabad session on 30 December 1937, Savarkar said :
“India cannot be assumed today to be a unitarian and homogeneous nation, but on the contrary, there are two nations in the main: the Hindus and the Moslems, in India.”
Savarkar’s position was that Hindus and Muslims are two distinct “nations” culturally and historically, yet they should remain within one undivided Indian State.
Jinnah’s two-nation theory drew the opposite conclusion; because they were two nations, Muslims needed a separate state.
That's why even BR Ambedkar observed that Savarkar and Jinnah agreed that there were “two nations” in India, but differed on the terms under which the two nations should live.
Savarkar did not just automatically endorse Jinnah’s 'territorial two-nation theory'.
He said Hindus and Muslims were two nations, but wanted them in one 'Akhand Bharat', under 'Hindu Rashtra'.
Source : Ishtiaq Ahmed, Jinnah: His Successes, Failures and Role in History [Delhi: Penguin Random House, 2020]
Primary source : Khurshid Ahmad Khan Yusufi, Speeches, Statements and Messages of the Quaid-e-Azam, Vol. I [Lahore: Bazm-i-Iqbal, 1996], pp. 330–34.)
Replying to @indicrealist
Can you seriously not read? When did I say Savarkar invented Pakistan or that he was the first to espouse the two nation theory? I simply said he did it before Jinnah. Also, for all of Khan’s theorising, but for Jinnah and the events of 37-47, Partition simply does not happen.
Every soul will have to chant the glorious name of God. If someone thinks they can escape then they will dwell for 84 lakh births only to realise they have made no progress and will again have to choose between reciting God's name or dwell again.









































