The term "AGI" has aged very poorly. AI can't possibly me more different from human intelligence. It's *far better* than human intelligence, for most economically-relevant tasks. But that doesn't make AIs better than humanity. There are wonderful things humans can do that these superintelligences (the better term) can't. For one, we care-for and care-about other humans in a powerful and inherent way, that we then teach machines to emulate. We must keep that as the top priority in everything we do. We have to be as pro-human-life as it gets. AIs can replace tasks you do, but they can't replace the proverbial you. This is why they horribly suck at writing! Even when given a corpus of your writing and 200 Skills and 50 subagents running in gRaPh LoOps, they produce robotic prose… because they are robots. I know one definitive way that people can become irrelevant. They stop being themselves: lose their identity, delegate all their writing, their unique thoughts, the creative ways in which they can use the machines. Opting out of 'weighing in'. I think we're safe though. There's nothing more distasteful right now than AI replies in social media or (🟢 T H I S T H I N G ) in landing pages. Quality and humanity will prevail.