my research engine tests 1000s of futures strategies, 99% fail. I trade the best on prop accounts and share free strategy code 👇

Joined October 2011
PropQuantX retweeted
Update: @lanto_trades has his dannystrades moment. He's not on account #42. He's on account #819. Quick posted and deleted by Lanto. This is fraud. Shame on Lanto and all those who enable him. I would like to see @VestExchange take a hard look at these edited Account Number videos/screenshots. Boot influencers who are deceiving the customerbase. Other firms would do that.
🚨PSA: Don’t fall for this furu bullshit. Huge profits. Huge payouts. Problem is the spend behind them is often obfuscated. Influencers are changing the account names that show how many accounts they've burned through. Typically they just hide the number. This time they are actively changing the account name. On Vest, every account is numbered, so your 5th account shows up as “Account 5” with a 5 in the icon next to it. There’s also an edit button that lets a trader change the account name, and once it’s edited, the icon shows an “A” instead of the real number, even if the new name still reads like a regular account number. Most people scrolling past an influencer’s screenshot would never notice that “A.” And if every account already comes named with its number, why would anyone edit the name just to make it look like another account number? Is that the actual account number? Doubtful. Below is a screenshot from @lanto_trades with edited account names. Not unexpected. 🧵
119
31
29
502
120,085
PropQuantX retweeted
Ran one of my ES strategies through 24 prop firms 50K funded plans. Same trades, same size, only the firm and their rules changed Opened an account on 250 different start dates and tracked 90 trading days each Winner was Tradeify Select Flex, $954 kept per account on avg and paid out 79% of the time. Topped it at every size I tested too @Tradeify ftw Funny one is Topstep Express Standard. Paid out most often (83%) but only 10th on actual money Paying often and paying the most is not the same thing. Stuff like this matters a lot more than people think when you're picking which prop firm to trade with
2
1
16
1,225
PropQuantX retweeted
PropQuantX Halyard aka "Range Sniper Bot" is now free. Both versions are up — TradingView (Pine) and NinjaTrader 8 (C#), full source included. Download it now in my discord, run it, and change whatever you want. Make it better.
5
8
1
116
21,458
PropQuantX retweeted
Every day people in this Discord suggest strategies for me to rebuild — usually ones being sold somewhere else. When I find the time, I make them and share them here for free. Here's another good one: this exact strategy is currently being sold for $99/month. In the discord, it's free — like everything else I drop.
8
1
90
8,976
PropQuantX retweeted
PropQuantX Rampart aka "TradeX Scalper ORB" is now free. Both versions are up — TradingView (Pine Script) and NinjaTrader 8 (C#), full source included. Download it now in my discord, run it, and change whatever you want. Make it better.
3
4
78
4,828
Everyone has probably seen one of those “amazing” Discord signal groups showing 20 wins, 10 losses and ridiculous monthly RR. Here’s the trick you need to watch for, because it can make completely unprofitable trading look profitable. A lot of these groups count TP1 being hit as a full +1R win. Example: BTC entry: 70,000 SL: 69,000 TP1: 71,000 TP2: 72,000 TP3: 74,000 On paper, TP1 is 1R away from entry. But you obviously cannot close 100% of your position at TP1 if you’re also supposed to hold for TP2 and TP3. So imagine you close 33% at TP1 and move the rest to breakeven. Price comes back, the remaining 67% closes at entry. What did you actually make? 33% × 1R = +0.33R 67% × 0R = 0R Your REAL result is +0.33R. Yet the signal group may happily put “+1R WIN ✅” into their statistics. Now apply that bullshit accounting to a monthly report: 20 “wins” = +20R 10 losses = -10R Reported result = +10R Looks great. But if those 20 wins were actually +0.33R each: 20 × 0.33R = +6.6R 10 losses = -10R REAL RESULT = -3.4R That amazing profitable month was actually a losing month. This is why you should never trust screenshots of win rates or monthly RR from signal groups without checking exactly how they calculate every trade. Partial exits matter. If they count partial TP hits as full wins, their performance statistics are worth jack shit.
2
3
754
open source free version of FDL indicator $80/month is wild. I coded this a year ago, so it might've changed a little since. claimed 90% win rate — not true. still seeing people pay for this, especially beginners who see that winrate claim. avoid it. github.com/cantolab/fibs-don…
16
5
82
7,976
PropQuantX retweeted
Replying to @Hanseltrade
@Hanseltrade charging $379/mo = $4,548/yr for a range breakout bot. I built the same thing. It costs nothing. Join the Discord and get access for free 👇 #Algotrading $NQ
1
1
6
596