1/2 "QAwerk team has been of enormous help in improving the quality of our releases at Kazidomi. They are communicative and highly professional, with a proactive attitude.
2/2 The automated and manual testing work we did with them was delivered to a high standard, and we’ve become trusted partners."
-- Benjamin Stuart, Product Manager at Kazidomi
More client stories: qawerk.com/testimonials/
1/9 Every few months a new article drops declaring AI has finally "solved" software testing. 2024, 2025, now 2026.
At QAwerk, we've spent the last year actually running these tools on real client projects. Not benchmarks. Real codebases, real deadlines, real bugs.
8/9 Ten years running QAwerk, we've watched every wave of "this will automate QA." Codeless testing, record-and-playback, model-based testing. Each one moved the floor up. None of them replaced judgment.
found a bug last week that passed every test
AI wrote it. looked clean. compiled fine.
failed in production because it had no idea how the rest of the system behaved
green tests aren't the same as correct code.
1/9 Every few months, a new wave of "how to become a QA automation tester" guides floods the internet. Coursera, Udemy, YouTube. take your pick. The roadmaps are always the same: learn Python, learn Selenium, learn some CI/CD basics, profit.
8/9 - Being comfortable with ambiguity. especially when requirements change mid-sprint
- Communication skills, because a bug report no one reads is just noise
9/9 The certification at the end of a 40-hour course won't hurt you. But it won't prepare you for the moment a regression suite fails at midnight before a release and you're the one who has to sort it out.
That part you learn by doing it.